Literature DB >> 2011987

Validity of an early postoperative baseline Doppler recording after aortic valve replacement.

R Wiseth1, L Hegrenaes, O Rossvoll, T Skjaerpe, L Hatle.   

Abstract

In 131 patients undergoing aortic valve replacement (53 bioprostheses, 78 mechanical), the pressure decrease across the prosthesis was recorded with Doppler ultrasound at a baseline study early postoperatively (mean 11 +/- 5 days) and compared with a repeat measurement 3 to 5 months later. At baseline the hemodynamic state was markedly different, with increased heart rate (89 +/- 14 vs. 74 +/- 13 beats/min, p less than 0.001) and decreased left ventricular ejection time index (367 +/- 21 vs 390 +/- 22, p less than 0.001). A minor and clinically insignificant decrease in pressure decrease with time was found. The 95% confidence interval for the difference was 0.2 to 3.0 and 0.2 to 1.7 mm Hg for the peak and the mean pressure decrease, respectively. The change in pressure decrease was statistically significant for bioprostheses (mean 16 +/- 5 vs 14 +/- 4 mm Hg, p less than 0.01) and smaller (less than or equal to 23 mm) valves (mean 17 +/- 4 vs 15 +/- 4 mm Hg, p less than 0.01), whereas no significant changes were found for mechanical valves or valves of a larger size. The change in mean pressure decrease from baseline to the second examination was within +/- 5 mm Hg for 82% of patients. It is concluded that despite a different hemodynamic state in the early postoperative period, the pressure decrease across aortic valve prostheses obtained at this time can be used as a reference for later comparison.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2011987     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(91)90621-q

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  3 in total

1.  Stentless bioprostheses have ideal haemodynamics, even in the small aortic root.

Authors:  L H Baur; Y Houdas; K H Peels; J Braun; B van Straten; A Prat; A P Kappetein; M Wolters-Geldoff; E E van der Wall; A V Bruschke; H A Huysmans
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  2000-10

2.  Early Doppler-echocardiography evaluation of Carpentier-Edwards Standard and Carpentier-Edwards Magna aortic prosthetic valve: comparison of hemodynamic performance.

Authors:  Giovanni Minardi; Giovanni Pulignano; Donatella Del Sindaco; Martina Sordi; Herribert Pavaci; Amedeo Pergolini; Giordano Zampi; Francesca Moschella Orsini; Carlo Gaudio; Francesco Musumeci
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 2.062

3.  Assessment of normal hemodynamic profile of mechanical pulmonary prosthesis by doppler echocardiography: a prospective cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Maryam Shojaeifard; Ali Daryanavard; Arman Karimi Behnagh; Maryam Moradian; Sajjad Erami; Hossein Dehghani Mohammad Abadi
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 2.062

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.