Literature DB >> 20119663

Application of preparative capillary gas chromatography (pcGC), automated structure generation and mutagenicity prediction to improve effect-directed analysis of genotoxicants in a contaminated groundwater.

Cornelia Meinert1, Emma Schymanski, Eberhard Küster, Ralph Kühne, Gerrit Schüürmann, Werner Brack.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND, AIM AND SCOPE: The importance of groundwater for human life cannot be overemphasised. Besides fulfilling essential ecological functions, it is a major source of drinking water. However, in the industrial area of Bitterfeld, it is contaminated with a multitude of harmful chemicals, including genotoxicants. Therefore, recently developed methodologies including preparative capillary gas chromatography (pcGC), MOLGEN-MS structure generation and mutagenicity prediction were applied within effect-directed analysis (EDA) to reduce sample complexity and to identify candidate mutagens in the samples. A major focus was put on the added value of these tools compared to conventional EDA combining reversed-phase liquid chromatography (RP-LC) followed by GC/MS analysis and MS library search.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We combined genotoxicity testing with umuC and RP-LC with pcGC fractionation to isolate genotoxic compounds from a contaminated groundwater sample. Spectral library information from the NIST05 database was combined with a computer-based structure generation tool called MOLGEN-MS for structure elucidation of unknowns. Finally, we applied a computer model for mutagenicity prediction (ChemProp) to identify candidate mutagens and genotoxicants. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: A total of 62 components were tentatively identified in genotoxic fractions. Ten of these components were predicted to be potentially mutagenic, whilst 2,4,6-trichlorophenol, 2,4-dichloro-6-methylphenol and 4-chlorobenzoic acid were confirmed as genotoxicants. CONCLUSIONS AND PERSPECTIVES: The results suggest pcGC as a high-resolution fractionation tool and MOLGEN-MS to improve structure elucidation, whilst mutagenicity prediction failed in our study to predict identified genotoxicants. Genotoxicity, mutagenicity and carcinogenicity caused by chemicals are complex processes, and prediction from chemical structure still appears to be quite difficult. Progress in this field would significantly support EDA and risk assessment of environmental mixtures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20119663     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-009-0286-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  19 in total

1.  Derivation and validation of toxicophores for mutagenicity prediction.

Authors:  Jeroen Kazius; Ross McGuire; Roberta Bursi
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2005-01-13       Impact factor: 7.446

Review 2.  How to confirm identified toxicants in effect-directed analysis.

Authors:  Werner Brack; Mechthild Schmitt-Jansen; Miroslav Machala; Rikke Brix; Damià Barceló; Emma Schymanski; Georg Streck; Tobias Schulze
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2008-01-26       Impact factor: 4.142

3.  Fractionation of technical p-nonylphenol with preparative capillary gas chromatography.

Authors:  Cornelia Meinert; Monika Moeder; Werner Brack
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2007-08-02       Impact factor: 7.086

Review 4.  Promises and pitfalls of quantitative structure-activity relationship approaches for predicting metabolism and toxicity.

Authors:  Elton Zvinavashe; Albertinka J Murk; Ivonne M C M Rietjens
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.739

5.  The use of MS classifiers and structure generation to assist in the identification of unknowns in effect-directed analysis.

Authors:  E L Schymanski; C Meinert; M Meringer; W Brack
Journal:  Anal Chim Acta       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 6.558

Review 6.  Validation of the SOS/umu test using test results of 486 chemicals and comparison with the Ames test and carcinogenicity data.

Authors:  G Reifferscheid; J Heil
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1996-08-12       Impact factor: 2.433

7.  A microplate version of the SOS/umu-test for rapid detection of genotoxins and genotoxic potentials of environmental samples.

Authors:  G Reifferscheid; J Heil; Y Oda; R K Zahn
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 2.433

8.  Gas chromatographic isolation of individual compounds from complex matrices for radiocarbon dating.

Authors:  T I Eglinton; L I Aluwihare; J E Bauer; E R Druffel; A P McNichol
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  1996-03-01       Impact factor: 6.986

9.  Validation of the SOS/Umu test with mutagenic complex mixtures.

Authors:  W Z Whong; Y F Wen; J Stewart; T M Ong
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 2.433

10.  Compound-specific chlorine isotope analysis of polychlorinated biphenyls isolated from Aroclor and Clophen technical mixtures.

Authors:  Manolis Mandalakis; Henry Holmstrand; Per Andersson; Orjan Gustafsson
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2007-10-15       Impact factor: 7.086

View more
  2 in total

1.  A unifying review of bioassay-guided fractionation, effect-directed analysis and related techniques.

Authors:  Michael G Weller
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 3.576

2.  The Critical Assessment of Small Molecule Identification (CASMI): Challenges and Solutions.

Authors:  Emma L Schymanski; Steffen Neumann
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2013-06-25
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.