Literature DB >> 20117245

Level of fellowship training increases adenoma detection rates.

Stevany L Peters1, Aliya G Hasan, Nicole B Jacobson, Gregory L Austin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The adenoma detection rate (ADR) is critical to the success of colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening. The effects of involving gastroenterology fellows in screening colonoscopies are uncertain. We assessed the effects of gastroenterology fellow participation on ADR and whether outcomes vary with year of fellowship training.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all average-risk screening colonoscopies performed from April 2005-April 2007 at the University of Colorado Hospital. A gastroenterology attending physician alone performed 2895 colonoscopies; 699 were performed by a gastroenterology fellow supervised by an attending physician. Statistical analyses of polyp, adenoma, and advanced adenoma (or cancer) detection were performed by using logistic regression.
RESULTS: The ADR was significantly higher (odds ratio [OR], 1.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10-1.59) among colonoscopies that included a gastroenterology fellow compared with those performed by only a gastroenterology attending physician. Similarly, the polyp detection rate was higher (OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.08-1.52) among colonoscopies involving a gastroenterology fellow. There was no difference in the detection of advanced adenomas or cancers (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.77-1.44) among colonoscopies involving a gastroenterology fellow. The ADR differed greatly by year of training. Compared with colonoscopies performed by an attending gastroenterologist alone, the ADR increased with each year of training: OR, 0.89 (95% CI, 0.66-1.22) for first-year fellows; OR, 1.31 (95% CI, 0.89-1.93) for second-year fellows; and OR, 1.70 (95% CI, 1.33-2.17) for third-year fellows.
CONCLUSIONS: Involvement of fellows in screening colonoscopies increases the ADR, primarily because of the increased ADR in procedures involving third-year gastroenterology fellows. Copyright (c) 2010 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20117245     DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2010.01.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 1542-3565            Impact factor:   11.382


  35 in total

1.  Removal of infused water predominantly during insertion (water exchange) is consistently associated with an increase in adenoma detection rate - review of data in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of water-related methods.

Authors:  Fw Leung; Jo Harker; Jw Leung; Rm Siao-Salera; Sk Mann; Fc Ramirez; S Friedland; A Amato; F Radaelli; S Paggi; V Terruzzi; Yh Hsieh
Journal:  J Interv Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-07-01

2.  Fellow involvement during colonoscopy does not reduce adenoma detection rate.

Authors:  Mark Friedman; Geeta Arora; Jesse Green
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  If you have a low adenoma detection rate, don't blame your fellows.

Authors:  Dayna S Early
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Lack of impact on polyp detection by fellow involvement during colonoscopy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Young S Oh; Chelsea L Collins; Shamsuddin Virani; Min-Su Kim; Julie A Slicker; Jeffrey L Jackson
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Stability of increased adenoma detection at colonoscopy. Follow-up of an endoscopic quality improvement program-EQUIP-II.

Authors:  Vivian Ussui; Susan Coe; Cynthia Rizk; Julia E Crook; Nancy N Diehl; Michael B Wallace
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 10.864

6.  Does the hands-on, technical training of residents in colonoscopy affect quality outcomes?

Authors:  David Pace; Mark Borgaonkar; Nikita Hickey; Brad Evans; Muna Lougheed; Curtis Marcoux; Jerry McGrath; Darrell Boone; Meghan O'Leary; Chris Smith
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Polyp Detection Rate Correlates Strongly with Adenoma Detection Rate in Trainee Endoscopists.

Authors:  Sandy Ng; Aditya K Sreenivasan; Jillian Pecoriello; Peter S Liang
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2020-01-11       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Adenoma detection rates decline with increasing procedural hours in an endoscopist's workload.

Authors:  Majid A Almadi; Maida Sewitch; Alan N Barkun; Myriam Martel; Lawrence Joseph
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2015-05-21

9.  A Longitudinal Study of Adenoma Detection Rate in Gastroenterology Fellowship Training.

Authors:  Robert J Gianotti; Sveta Shah Oza; Elliot B Tapper; Darshan Kothari; Sunil G Sheth
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Differences with experienced nurse assistance during colonoscopy in detecting polyp and adenoma: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Weihong Wang; Lu Xu; Zhenfei Bao; Linyin Sun; Chunyan Hu; Feng Zhou; Lei Xu; Dingmei Shi
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.