Literature DB >> 20115948

Ultrasound tightening of facial and neck skin: a rater-blinded prospective cohort study.

Murad Alam1, Lucile E White, Nicolle Martin, Joslyn Witherspoon, Simon Yoo, Dennis P West.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nonablative skin tightening technologies offer the prospect of reduction of wrinkles and skin sagging with minimal downtime, discomfort, and risk of adverse events. The excellent safety profile is mitigated by the limited efficacy of such procedures.
OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess the efficacy of ultrasound skin tightening for brow-lift in the context of a procedure treating the full face and neck.
METHODS: This was a rater-blinded, prospective cohort study at a dermatology clinic in an urban academic medical center. Subjects were medicated with topical anesthetic and then treated with an investigational focused intense ultrasound tightening device to the forehead, temples, cheeks, submental region, and side of neck using the following probes: 4 MHz, 4.5-mm focal depth; 7 MHz, 4.5-mm focal depth; and 7 MHz, 3.0-mm focal depth. Standardized photographs of front and side views were obtained at 2, 7, 28, 60, and 90 days; rating scales of pain, adverse events, physical findings, and patient satisfaction were also completed. Primary outcome measure was detection of improvement in paired comparison of pretreatment and posttreatment (day 90) photographs by 3 masked expert physician assessors, cosmetic and laser dermatologists, and plastic surgeons who were not authors. Second primary outcome measure was objective brow elevation as quantitated by a standard procedure using fixed landmarks. Secondary outcomes measure was patient satisfaction as measured by a questionnaire.
RESULTS: A total of 36 subjects (34 female) were enrolled, one subject dropped out, and 35 subjects were evaluated. Median age was 44 years (range 32-62). On the first primary outcome measure, 30 of 35 subjects (86%) were judged by the 3 masked experienced clinician raters to show clinically significant brow-lift 90 days after treatment (P = .00001). On the second primary outcome measure, mean value of average change in eyebrow height as assessed by measurement of photographs at 90 days was 1.7 mm. LIMITATIONS: Limitations of this study include the inability to quantitatively measure lower face tightening because of the lack of fixed anatomic landmarks in this area.
CONCLUSION: Ultrasound appears to be a safe and effective modality for facial skin tightening. A single ultrasound treatment of the forehead produced on average brow height elevation of slightly less than 2 mm. Most treated individuals responded, commonly with accompanying transitory mild erythema and edema. Copyright (c) 2009 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20115948     DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2009.06.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol        ISSN: 0190-9622            Impact factor:   11.527


  20 in total

1.  Synergistic effect of high-intensity focused ultrasound and low-fluence Q-switched Nd:YAG laser in the treatment of the aging neck and décolletage.

Authors:  Jae-Hui Nam; Young-Jun Choi; Jae Yun Lim; Joon Hong Min; Won-Serk Kim
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 2.  Overview of therapeutic ultrasound applications and safety considerations.

Authors:  Douglas L Miller; Nadine B Smith; Michael R Bailey; Gregory J Czarnota; Kullervo Hynynen; Inder Raj S Makin
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.153

3.  Long-term Efficacy of Micro-focused Ultrasound with Visualization for Lifting and Tightening Lax Facial and Neck Skin Using a Customized Vectoring Treatment Method.

Authors:  William Philip Werschler; Pam Schell Werschler
Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol       Date:  2016-02

Review 4.  Insights on Skin Quality and Clinical Practice Trends in Asia Pacific and a Practical Guide to Good Skin Quality from the Inside Out.

Authors:  Je-Young Park; Jeng-Feng Chen; Hosung Choi; Wilson W S Ho; Ni Nyoman Indra Lesthari; Joyce Teng Ee Lim; Ting Song Lim; Stephen Lowe; Beverly Ong-Amoranto; Vasanop Vachiramon; Rungsima Wanitphakdeedecha; Martina Kerscher
Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol       Date:  2022-06

5.  Customized Treatment Using Microfocused Ultrasound with Visualization for Optimized Patient Outcomes: A Review of Skin-tightening Energy Technologies and a Pan-Asian Adaptation of the Expert Panel's Gold Standard Consensus.

Authors:  Je-Young Park; Frank Lin; Atchima Suwanchinda; Rungsima Wanitphakdeedecha; Jonathan Yu; Ting Song Lim; Jeng Feng Chen; Wilson Ho; Joyce Lim; Lanny Juniarty; Yong Seng Kee; Seong Jae Youn; Sabrina Fabi
Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol       Date:  2021-05-01

Review 6.  Noninvasive skin tightening: focus on new ultrasound techniques.

Authors:  Sabrina Guillen Fabi
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol       Date:  2015-02-05

7.  High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound for the Treatment of Wrinkles and Skin Laxity in Seven Different Facial Areas.

Authors:  Hyunchul Park; Eunjin Kim; Jeongeun Kim; Youngsuck Ro; Jooyeon Ko
Journal:  Ann Dermatol       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 1.444

8.  Microfocused Ultrasound with Visualization and Calcium Hydroxylapatite for Improving Skin Laxity and Cellulite Appearance.

Authors:  Gabriela Casabona; Gregório Pereira
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2017-07-25

9.  Single Treatment, Single Depth Superficial Microfocused Ultrasound with Visualization for Rhytid Improvement.

Authors:  Stephen Lowe
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-07-13

10.  Use of Micro-focused Ultrasound for Skin Tightening of Mid and Lower Face.

Authors:  Debraj Shome; Sapna Vadera; M Shiva Ram; Stuti Khare; Rinky Kapoor
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-12-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.