Literature DB >> 2011461

The interplay between stereopsis and structure from motion.

M Nawrot1, R Blake.   

Abstract

In a series of psychophysical experiments, an adaptation paradigm was employed to study the influence of stereopsis on perception of rotation in an ambiguous kinetic depth (KD) display. Without prior adaptation or stereopsis, a rotating globe undergoes spontaneous reversals in perceived direction of rotation, with successive durations of perceived rotation being random variables. Following 90 sec of viewing a stereoscopic globe undergoing unambiguous rotation, the KD globe appeared to rotate in a direction opposite that experienced during the stereoscopic adaptation period. This adaptation aftereffect was short-lived, and it occurred only when the adaptation and test figures stimulated the same retinal areas, and only when the adaptation and test figures rotated about the same axis. The aftereffect was just as strong when the test and adaptation figures had different shapes, as long as the adaptation figure contained multiple directions of motion imaged at different retinal disparities. Nonstereoscopic adaptation figures had no effect on the perceived direction of rotation of the ambiguous KD figure. These results imply that stereopsis and motion strongly interact in the specification of structure from motion, a result that complements earlier work on this problem.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2011461     DOI: 10.3758/bf03214308

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  45 in total

1.  Conflicting motion perspective simulating sinultaneous clockwise and counterclockwise rotation in depth.

Authors:  W A Hershberger; M R Stewart; N K Laughlin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Reversible perspective in Lissajous figures; some theoretical considerations.

Authors:  V R FISICHELLI
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1947-04

3.  Kinetic depth effect and identification of shape.

Authors:  G Sperling; M S Landy
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Perception of structure from motion: is projective correspondence of moving elements a necessary condition?

Authors:  J T Todd
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Integration of direction signals of image motion in the superior temporal sulcus of the macaque monkey.

Authors:  H Saito; M Yukie; K Tanaka; K Hikosaka; Y Fukada; E Iwai
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Structure from stereo and motion.

Authors:  W Richards
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 2.129

7.  Does colour provide an input to human motion perception?

Authors:  V S Ramachandran; R L Gregory
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1978-09-07       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Interocular delay produces depth in subjectively moving noise patterns.

Authors:  M J Morgan; R Ward
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 2.143

9.  How does binocular delay give information about depth?

Authors:  D C Burr; J Ross
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Stochastic models and fluctuations in reversal time of ambiguous figures.

Authors:  A De Marco; P Penengo; A Trabucco
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 1.490

View more
  18 in total

1.  Cue combination in the motion correspondence problem.

Authors:  P B Hibbard; M F Bradshaw; R A Eagle
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Planar motion permits perception of metric structure in stereopsis.

Authors:  J S Lappin; S R Love
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-01

3.  Demonstration of cue recruitment: change in visual appearance by means of Pavlovian conditioning.

Authors:  Qi Haijiang; Jeffrey A Saunders; Rebecca W Stone; Benjamin T Backus
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-12-30       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Competition between newly recruited and pre-existing visual cues during the construction of visual appearance.

Authors:  Benjamin T Backus; Qi Haijiang
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Motion aftereffects specific to surface depth order: beyond binocular disparity.

Authors:  Wonyeong Sohn; Adriane E Seiffert
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Adaptive estimation of three-dimensional structure in the human brain.

Authors:  Tim J Preston; Zoe Kourtzi; Andrew E Welchman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  How is motion disparity integrated with binocular disparity in depth perception?

Authors:  M Ichikawa; S Saida
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-02

8.  Recovery of 3-D shape from binocular disparity and structure from motion.

Authors:  J S Tittle; M L Braunstein
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-08

9.  Stereo-motion cooperation and the use of motion disparity in the visual perception of 3-D structure.

Authors:  V Cornilleau-Pérès; J Droulez
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-08

10.  Neural integration of information specifying human structure from form, motion, and depth.

Authors:  Stuart Jackson; Randolph Blake
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.