Literature DB >> 20113768

Effects of word frequency and phonological neighborhood characteristics on confrontation naming in children who stutter and normally fluent peers.

Nan Bernstein Ratner1, Rochelle Newman, Amy Strekas.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: In a prior study (Newman & Bernstein Ratner, 2007), we examined the effects of word frequency and phonological neighborhood characteristics on confrontation naming latency, accuracy and fluency in adults who stutter and typically fluent speakers. A small difference in accuracy favoring fluent adults was noted, but no other patterns differentiated fluent speaker responses from those obtained from the adults who stutter. Because lexical organization or retrieval differences might be more easily observed in less mature language users, we replicated the experiment using 15 children who stutter (ages 4;10 16;2) and age- and gender-matched peers. Results replicated the earlier study: the two groups of participants showed strikingly similar patterns of responses based on word frequency and neighborhood characteristics. There were also no differences in naming accuracy overall between the two groups. Given our results and those of other researchers who have explored the impact of neighborhood variables on lexical retrieval in people who stutter, we suggest that differences between language production in PWS and fluent speakers are not likely to involve atypical phonological organization of lexical neighborhoods. EDUCATIONAL
OBJECTIVES: After reading this article, the reader will be able to: (1) define and illustrate words that have differing frequency and phonological neighborhood characteristics; (2) evaluate whether or not children who stutter appear to organize their mental lexicons differently than those of children who are typically fluent; (3) suggest future areas of research into language processing in people who stutter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20113768     DOI: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2009.09.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fluency Disord        ISSN: 0094-730X            Impact factor:   2.538


  10 in total

1.  Exploring semantic and phonological picture-word priming in adults who stutter using event-related potentials.

Authors:  Nathan D Maxfield; Angela A Pizon-Moore; Stefan A Frisch; Joseph L Constantine
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  A preliminary investigation of phonological encoding skills in children who stutter.

Authors:  Jayanthi Sasisekaran; Alison Brady; Jillian Stein
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 2.538

3.  The influence of phonetic complexity on stuttered speech.

Authors:  Geoffrey A Coalson; Courtney T Byrd; Barbara L Davis
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.346

4.  Novel word recognition in childhood stuttering.

Authors:  Erica Lescht; Courtney Venker; Jacie R McHaney; Jason W Bohland; Amanda Hampton Wray
Journal:  Top Lang Disord       Date:  2022 Jan-Mar

5.  Adults Who Stutter Show Diminished Word Fluency, Regardless of Mode.

Authors:  Erica Lescht; Michael Walsh Dickey; Melissa D Stockbridge; Nan Bernstein Ratner
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 2.674

6.  Objective support for subjective reports of successful inner speech in two people with aphasia.

Authors:  William Hayward; Sarah F Snider; George Luta; Rhonda B Friedman; Peter E Turkeltaub
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  How children explore the phonological network in child-directed speech: A survival analysis of children's first word productions.

Authors:  Matthew T Carlson; Morgan Sonderegger; Max Bane
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.059

8.  The effect of phonetic complexity on the speed of single-word productions in adults who do and do not stutter.

Authors:  Courtney T Byrd; Geoffrey A Coalson; Jie Yang; Kirsten Moriarty
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 2.288

9.  Real-time processing in picture naming in adults who stutter: ERP evidence.

Authors:  Nathan D Maxfield; Kalie Morris; Stefan A Frisch; Kathryn Morphew; Joseph L Constantine
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 3.708

10.  Use of a phoneme monitoring task to examine lexical access in adults who do and do not stutter.

Authors:  Timothy A Howell; Nan Bernstein Ratner
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 2.538

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.