Literature DB >> 20113451

The potential impact of selective donor deferrals based on estimated blood volume on vasovagal reactions and donor deferral rates.

Jorge A Rios1, Junyong Fang, Yongling Tu, David J Wright, Bryan Spencer, Christopher D Hillyer, Krista L Hillyer, Anne F Eder, Richard J Benjamin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Whole blood donation in the United States is restricted in volume to 10.5 mL/kg or less in an effort to prevent hypovolemic reactions, but still may exceed more than 15% of a donor's estimated blood volume (EBV). We analyzed the association of EBV with prefaint and systemic vasovagal reactions (SVRs) among whole blood donors and the potential impact of an EBV-based deferral policy. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Independent predictors for prefaint reactions and SVRs were assessed by multivariate logistic regression analysis on 591,177 unique donors participating in the Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study-II study.
RESULTS: Young age (16 years old odds ratio [OR], 3.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.78-4.94), low EBV (<3.5 L OR, 3.30; 95% CI, 2.57-4.23), and first-time donation status (OR, 2.33; 95% CI, 2.03-2.67) were the strongest predictors for SVRs, with similar trends seen for prefaint reactions. Sex, height, race, blood center, and donation site were weakly associated predictors. A total of 5.6% of all donors had an EBV of less than 3.5 L and experienced 12.5% of all prefaint reactions and 14.5% of SVRs. The highest reaction rates were seen in donors less than 23 years old with an EBV of less than 3.5 L who comprised 2.7% of all donors, who were mostly female (99.9%), and who experienced 8.8% of prefaint reactions and 11.0% of SVRs.
CONCLUSION: Young age, low EBV, and first-time donation status are the major correlates of prefaint reactions and SVRs, suggesting that high school and college donors are at particular risk. Deferral of donors with low EBV who are less than 23 years old may offer a rational approach to protecting donors at greater risk of reactions without jeopardizing the adequacy of the blood supply.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20113451      PMCID: PMC4167765          DOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2009.02578.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfusion        ISSN: 0041-1132            Impact factor:   3.157


  16 in total

1.  Mild reactions to blood donation predict a decreased likelihood of donor return.

Authors:  Christopher R France; Janis L France; Marios Roussos; Blaine Ditto
Journal:  Transfus Apher Sci       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.764

2.  The American Red Cross donor hemovigilance program: complications of blood donation reported in 2006.

Authors:  Anne F Eder; Beth A Dy; Jean M Kennedy; Edward P Notari Iv; Annie Strupp; Mary Ellen Wissel; Ramakrishna Reddy; Joan Gibble; Marcia D Haimowitz; Bruce H Newman; Linda A Chambers; Christopher D Hillyer; Richard J Benjamin
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 3.157

3.  Mitigating adverse reactions in youthful donors.

Authors:  Christopher R France; Jay E Menitove
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 3.157

4.  The relative safety of automated two-unit red blood cell procedures and manual whole-blood collection in young donors.

Authors:  Richard J Benjamin; Beth A Dy; Jean M Kennedy; Edward P Notari; Anne F Eder
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 3.157

5.  Prediction of blood volume in normal human adults.

Authors:  Samuel B Nadler; John H Hidalgo; Ted Bloch
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1962-02       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  Vasovagal reactions in high school students: findings relative to race, risk factor synergism, female sex, and non-high school participants.

Authors:  B H Newman
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.157

7.  Adverse effects in blood donors after whole-blood donation: a study of 1000 blood donors interviewed 3 weeks after whole-blood donation.

Authors:  Bruce H Newman; Shawn Pichette; Dena Pichette; Ema Dzaka
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.157

8.  Social support attenuates presyncopal reactions to blood donation.

Authors:  Sarah A Hanson; Christopher R France
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2009-01-02       Impact factor: 3.157

9.  A study of criteria for blood donor deferral.

Authors:  P A Tomasulo; A J Anderson; M B Paluso; M A Gutschenritter; R H Aster
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  1980 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.157

10.  Predonation water ingestion attenuates negative reactions to blood donation.

Authors:  Sarah A Hanson; Christopher R France
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.157

View more
  11 in total

1.  Vasovagal reactions in whole blood donors at three REDS-II blood centers in Brazil.

Authors:  Thelma T Gonçalez; Ester C Sabino; Karen S Schlumpf; David J Wright; Silvana Leao; Divaldo Sampaio; Pedro L Takecian; Anna B Proietti; Anna B Proitetti; Edward Murphy; Michael Busch; Brian Custer
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 3.157

Review 2.  Management of young blood donors.

Authors:  Bruce H Newman
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 3.747

3.  Adverse reactions and other factors that impact subsequent blood donation visits.

Authors:  Brian Custer; Jorge A Rios; Karen Schlumpf; Ram M Kakaiya; Jerome L Gottschall; David J Wright
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 3.157

4.  The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute retrovirus epidemiology donor studies (Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study and Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study-II): twenty years of research to advance blood product safety and availability.

Authors:  Steven Kleinman; Melissa R King; Michael P Busch; Edward L Murphy; Simone A Glynn
Journal:  Transfus Med Rev       Date:  2012-05-24

5.  BMI and obesity in US blood donors: a potential public health role for the blood centre.

Authors:  Edward L Murphy; Karen Schlumpf; David J Wright; Ritchard Cable; John Roback; Ronald Sacher; Michael P Busch
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 4.022

6.  Vasovagal reactions in whole blood and apheresis donors: a cross-sectional study on donor haemovigilance data from 2016 to 2019 in Italy.

Authors:  Vanessa Piccinini; Giuseppe Marano; Liviana Catalano; Ilaria Pati; Eva Veropalumbo; Chiara de Waure; Simonetta Pupella; Vincenzo De Angelis
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 5.752

7.  A Study on the Effect of Pre-donation Salt Loading on Vasovagal Reactions in Young College Going Whole Blood Donors.

Authors:  Suchet Sachdev; Lakhvinder Singh; Ratti Ram Sharma; Neelam Marwaha
Journal:  Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 0.900

8.  Impact of Elevated Hemoglobin and Serum Protein on Vasovagal Reaction from Blood Donation.

Authors:  Takeshi Odajima; Minoko Takanashi; Hiroki Sugimori; Taiko Tanba; Kentaro Yoshinaga; Toshiko Motoji; Masaya Munakata; Kazunori Nakajima; Mutsuhiko Minami
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Factors associated with vasovagal reactions in apheresis plasma and whole blood donors: a statistical-epidemiological study in a European donor cohort.

Authors:  Jansen N Seheult; Merete Eis Lund; Mark H Yazer; Kjell Titlestad
Journal:  Blood Res       Date:  2016-12-23

10.  Joint effects of risk factors on adverse events associated with adult blood donations.

Authors:  Hsuan-Hui Wang; Po-Ming Chen; Chi-Ling Lin; Rong-Chiou Jau; Sheng-Mou Hsiao; Jiunn-Liang Ko
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.