Literature DB >> 18631167

The American Red Cross donor hemovigilance program: complications of blood donation reported in 2006.

Anne F Eder1, Beth A Dy, Jean M Kennedy, Edward P Notari Iv, Annie Strupp, Mary Ellen Wissel, Ramakrishna Reddy, Joan Gibble, Marcia D Haimowitz, Bruce H Newman, Linda A Chambers, Christopher D Hillyer, Richard J Benjamin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The American Red Cross (ARC) initiated a comprehensive donor hemovigilance program in 2003. We provide an overview of reported complications after whole blood (WB), apheresis platelet (PLT), or automated red cell (R2) donation and analyze factors contributing to the variability in reported complication rates in our national program. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Complications recorded at the collection site or reported after allogeneic WB, apheresis PLT, and R2 donation procedures in 36 regional blood centers in 2006 were analyzed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression.
RESULTS: Complications after 6,014,472 WB, 449,594 PLT, and 228,183 R2 procedures totaled 209,815, 25,966, and 12,282 (348.9, 577.5, and 538.3 per 10,000 donations), respectively, the vast majority of which were minor presyncopal reactions and small hematomas. Regional center, donor age, sex, and donation status were independently associated with complication rates after WB, PLT, and R2 donation. Seasonal variability in complications rates after WB and R2 donation correlated with the proportion of donors under 20 years old. Excluding large hematomas, the overall rate of major complications was 7.4, 5.2, and 3.3 per 10,000 collections for WB, PLT, and R2 procedures, respectively. Outside medical care was recorded at similar rates for both WB and automated collections (3.2 vs. 2.9 per 10,000 donations, respectively).
CONCLUSION: The ARC data describe the current risks of blood donation in a model multicenter hemovigilance system using standardized definitions and reporting protocols. Reported reaction rates varied by regional center independently of donor demographics, limiting direct comparison of different regional blood centers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18631167     DOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2008.01811.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfusion        ISSN: 0041-1132            Impact factor:   3.157


  29 in total

1.  Vasovagal reactions in whole blood donors at three REDS-II blood centers in Brazil.

Authors:  Thelma T Gonçalez; Ester C Sabino; Karen S Schlumpf; David J Wright; Silvana Leao; Divaldo Sampaio; Pedro L Takecian; Anna B Proietti; Anna B Proitetti; Edward Murphy; Michael Busch; Brian Custer
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 3.157

2.  Risk factors for complications in donors at first and repeat whole blood donation: a cohort study with assessment of the impact on donor return.

Authors:  Johanna C Wiersum-Osselton; Tanneke Marijt-van der Kreek; Anneke Brand; Ingrid Veldhuizen; Johanna G van der Bom; Wim de Kort
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 3.443

3.  Adverse reactions to blood donations: the READ project.

Authors:  Giovanni Garozzo; Isabella Crocco; Barbara Giussani; Annalisa Martinucci; Stefano Monacelli; Vanda Randi
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.443

4.  Donor Hemovigilance with Blood Donation.

Authors:  Ulrich Diekamp; Johannes Gneißl; Angela Rabe; Stephan T Kießig
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 3.747

5.  Predictors of vasovagal reactions during preoperative autologous blood donation: a single-institution analysis.

Authors:  Hisakazu Nishimori; Nobuharu Fujii; Keiko Fujii; Tohru Ikeda; Naomi Asano; Hiroaki Ogo; Miwa Yamakawa; Naoe Takagi; Fumio Otsuka; Kazuma Ikeda
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 2.490

6.  Donor Hemovigilance during Preparatory Plasmapheresis.

Authors:  Ulrich Diekamp; Johannes Gneißl; Angela Rabe; Stephan T Kießig
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2014-02-17       Impact factor: 3.747

Review 7.  Management of young blood donors.

Authors:  Bruce H Newman
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 3.747

8.  Donor Safety in Haemapheresis: Development of an Internet-Based Registry for Comprehensive Assessment of Adverse Events from Healthy Donors.

Authors:  Hans-Gert Heuft; Eike Fischer; Tina Weingand; Thomas Burkhardt; Gerda Leitner; Hagen Baume; Jörg-Peter Schmidt; Andreas Buser; Gabriele Fauchald; Ute Reinicke Voigt; Behrouz Mansouri-Taleghani
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 3.747

9.  The potential impact of selective donor deferrals based on estimated blood volume on vasovagal reactions and donor deferral rates.

Authors:  Jorge A Rios; Junyong Fang; Yongling Tu; David J Wright; Bryan Spencer; Christopher D Hillyer; Krista L Hillyer; Anne F Eder; Richard J Benjamin
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 3.157

10.  Adverse events and retention of donors of double red cell units by apheresis.

Authors:  Ketevan Keshelashvili; Alix O'meara; Martin Stern; Zuzana Jirout; Vildana Pehlic; Andreas Holbro; Andreas Buser; Jörg Sigle; Laura Infanti
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 3.443

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.