| Literature DB >> 20110883 |
Supaluk Prachayasittikul1, Orapin Wongsawatkul, Apilak Worachartcheewan, Chanin Nantasenamat, Somsak Ruchirawat, Virapong Prachayasittikul.
Abstract
Nicotinic acid, known as vitamin B(3), is an effective lipid lowering drug and intense cutaneous vasodilator. This study reports the effect of 2-(1-adamantylthio)nicotinic acid (6) and its amide 7 and nitrile analog 8 on phenylephrine-induced contraction of rat thoracic aorta as well as antioxidative activity. It was found that the tested thionicotinic acid analogs 6-8 exerted maximal vasorelaxation in a dose-dependent manner, but their effects were less than acetylcholine (ACh)-induced nitric oxide (NO) vasorelaxation. The vasorelaxations were reduced, apparently, in both N(G)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) and indomethacin (INDO). Synergistic effects were observed in the presence of L-NAME plus INDO, leading to loss of vasorelaxation of both the ACh and the tested nicotinic acids. Complete loss of the vasorelaxation was noted under removal of endothelial cells. This infers that the vasorelaxations are mediated partially by endothelium-induced NO and prostacyclin. The thionicotinic acid analogs all exhibited antioxidant properties in both 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) assays. Significantly, the thionicotinic acid 6 is the most potent vasorelaxant with ED(50) of 21.3 nM and is the most potent antioxidant (as discerned from DPPH assay). Molecular modeling was also used to provide mechanistic insights into the vasorelaxant and antioxidative activities. The findings reveal that the thionicotinic acid analogs are a novel class of vasorelaxant and antioxidant compounds which have potential to be further developed as promising therapeutics.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20110883 PMCID: PMC6257051 DOI: 10.3390/molecules15010198
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Chemical structure of nicotinic acid derivatives and related compounds 1-5.
Figure 2Chemical structures (a) and geometrically optimized structures at B3LYP/6-31g(d) (b) of thionicotinic acid analogs 6-8.
Figure 3Effect of 6 on the vascular function of rat thoracic aorta in the presence of L-NAME (1 mM) compared with ACh.
Vasorelaxant activity of thionicotinic acid analogs 6-8.
| Compound | Vasorelaxant activity | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without L-NAME | With L-NAME (1mM) | ||||
| Rmax (%) | ED50 (M) | Rmax (%) | ED50 (M) | ||
| 78.67 ± 0.48 | 2.13 × 10-8 | 47.60 ± 0.83 | 2.50 × 10-8 | ||
| ACha | 108.17 ± 1.22 | 4.72 × 10-7 | 81.59 ± 0.63 | 4.92 × 10-7 | |
| 77.69 ± 0.47 | 1.25 × 10-7 | 43.72 ± 0.70 | 2.66 × 10-7 | ||
| AChb | 109.86 ± 0.65 | 5.29 × 10-7 | 83.54 ± 0.91 | 5.49 × 10-7 | |
| 71.64 ± 0.55 | 2.44 × 10-7 | 42.36 ± 0.98 | 3.05 × 10-7 | ||
| ACha | 108.17 ± 1.22 | 4.72 × 10-7 | 81.59 ± 0.27 | 4.92 × 10-7 | |
a Data obtained from six experiments; b Data obtained from five experiments.
Figure 4Effect of 7 on the vascular function of rat thoracic aorta in the presence of L-NAME (1 mM) compared with ACh.
Figure 5Effect of 8 on the vascular function of rat thoracic aorta in the presence of L-NAME (1 mM) compared with ACh.
Effect of endothelial cells on vascular effect of nicotinic acid analogs 6-8.
| Compound | Vasorelaxant activity | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +et a | −et b | ||||
| Rmax (%) | ED50 (M) | Rmax (%) | ED50 (M) | ||
| 78.18 ± 0.79 | 6.64 × 10-8 | 0 | − | ||
| AChc | 104.89 ± 1.33 | 2.66 × 10-7 | 7.11 ± 0.35 | 3.13 × 10-7 | |
| 75.19 ± 0.59 | 1.05 × 10-7 | 0 | − | ||
| AChd | 103.45 ± 1.12 | 3.35 × 10-7 | 7.47 ± 0.15 | 3.13 × 10-7 | |
| 71.92 ± 0.52 | 3.82 × 10-7 | 0 | − | ||
| AChd | 103.45 ± 1.12 | 3.35 × 10-7 | 7.47 ± 0.15 | 3.13 × 10-7 | |
a +et: in the presence of endothelial cells; b -et: in the absence of endothelial cells; c Data obtained from five experiments; d Data obtained from six experiments.
Figure 6Effect of 6 and ACh on the vascular function of rat thoracic aorta under removal of endothelium (-et) compared with intact endothelium (+et).
Effect of inhibitors on vascular effect of nicotinic acid analogs 6-8.
| Compound | Vasorelaxant activity | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −Inhibitora | +L-NAME (1mM) | +INDO (1mM) | +L-NAME (1mM) +INDO (1mM) | |||||
| Rmax (%) | ED50 (M) | Rmax (%) | ED50 (M) | Rmax (%) | ED50 (M) | Rmax (%) | ED50 (M) | |
| AChb | 121.7 ± 1.44 | 9.99 × 10-7 | 81.34 ± 0.77 | 5.44 × 10-7 | 68.78 ± 0.92 | 4.58 × 10-7 | 0 | − |
| 77.67±0.66 | 1.78 × 10-8 | 47.44 ± 0.44 | 3.55 × 10-8 | 46.05 ± 0.26 | 7.17 × 10-8 | 0 | − | |
| 76.93±0.56 | 1.23 × 10-7 | 43.22 ± 0.66 | 3.88 × 10-7 | 36.49 ± 0.60 | 6.34 × 10-7 | 0 | − | |
| 71.47±0.42 | 2.05 × 10-7 | 42.10 ± 0.65 | 3.43 × 10-7 | 37.63 ± 0.62 | 6.14 × 10-7 | 0 | − | |
| SNPc | 120.81±1.18 | 3.16 × 10-7 | 116.70 ± 1.30 | 3.17 × 10-7 | 112.93 ± 0.61 | 3.16 × 10-7 | 104.98±1.41 | 3.17×10-7 |
a -Inhibitor: in the absence of L-NAME or INDO; b Data obtained from five experiments; c Data obtained from six experiments.
Figure 7Effect of 6 on the vascular function of rat thoracic aorta in the presence of INDO compared with L-NAME and with L-NAME plus INDO.
Antioxidative activities of analogs 6-8.
| Compound | % DPPH radical scavenging activitya | % NBT inhibitionb |
|---|---|---|
|
| 33.20 | 15.40 |
|
| 0.57 | 15.45 |
|
| 0.30 | 17.31 |
a Concentration of 333.33 μg/mL was used in the assay. α-Tocopherol was used as a positive control.
b Concentration of 300 μg/mL was used in the assay. Native SOD (4140 U/mg) from bovine erythrocytes was used as a standard.
Calculated molecular descriptors derived from B3LYP/6-31g(d) as correlated with the vasorelaxant ED50.
| Compound | Dipole moment (Debye) | IP (eV) | HOMO-LUMO gap (eV) | ED50 (M) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.4098 | 0.2184 | 0.1605 | 2.13×10-8 | |
| 3.6920 | 0.2265 | 0.1837 | 1.25×10-7 | |
| 4.8092 | 0.2285 | 0.1669 | 2.44×10-7 | |
| ACh | 13.1100 | 0.3976 | 0.2800 | 4.72×10-7 |
| Correlation with ED50 | 0.9594 | 0.9038 | 0.8879 |
Calculated molecular descriptors derived from B3LYP/6-31g(d) as correlated with the antioxidative activities.
| Compound | Dipole moment (Debye) | IP (eV) | HOMO-LUMO gap (eV) | DPPH (%) | NBT (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 2.4098 | 0.2184 | 0.1605 | 33.20 | 15.40 |
|
| 3.6920 | 0.2265 | 0.1837 | 0.57 | 15.45 |
|
| 4.8092 | 0.2285 | 0.1669 | 0.30 | 17.31 |
| Correlation with DPPH | -0.8885 | -0.9826 | -0.7086 | ||
| Correlation with NBT | 0.8575 | 0.6748 | -0.2276 |