OBJECTIVE: A "window of therapeutic opportunity" has been hypothesized to be present in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA). To determine the date of this window, we must know the symptom-onset date of the RA. Patients participating in an observational study of early aggressive rheumatoid factor (RF) positive RA were evaluated to assess the accuracy of their recall of symptom-onset date by comparing the onset date they reported at the first visit with that reported on subsequent 6-monthly questionnaires. METHODS: One hundred eighty-six patients with early RA (at entry: median disease duration 5.8 mo, mean RF 413.8 +/- 630.7 IU/ml, 20.6 +/- 10.9 swollen and 23.7 +/- 13.4 tender joints) completed a self-reported mailed questionnaire every 6 months for up to 5 years. As a part of each questionnaire, patients were asked to recall their RA symptom-onset date. These dates were then compared to the dates reported on the initial questionnaire. RESULTS: Thirteen months after symptom onset (i.e., about 6 mo after study entry) 61% of patients recalled the symptom-onset date (within 1 mo) that they had reported at baseline; the proportion decreased to 39% at 31 months and 25% after 70 months. During this period, the proportion overestimating RA duration remained about 20%, but the proportion underestimating it increased from 23% at 13 months to 39% at 31 months, and to 50% after 56 months. Patients with longer disease duration, less disease activity, and higher pain levels tended to be less accurate. CONCLUSION: Accuracy of recall of RA symptom-onset date by patients tends to decline over a period of 5 years. This should be taken into consideration when enrolling patients, when interpreting the findings of early RA clinical trials, and when attempting to ascertain the presence of a window of therapeutic opportunity.
OBJECTIVE: A "window of therapeutic opportunity" has been hypothesized to be present in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA). To determine the date of this window, we must know the symptom-onset date of the RA. Patients participating in an observational study of early aggressive rheumatoid factor (RF) positive RA were evaluated to assess the accuracy of their recall of symptom-onset date by comparing the onset date they reported at the first visit with that reported on subsequent 6-monthly questionnaires. METHODS: One hundred eighty-six patients with early RA (at entry: median disease duration 5.8 mo, mean RF 413.8 +/- 630.7 IU/ml, 20.6 +/- 10.9 swollen and 23.7 +/- 13.4 tender joints) completed a self-reported mailed questionnaire every 6 months for up to 5 years. As a part of each questionnaire, patients were asked to recall their RA symptom-onset date. These dates were then compared to the dates reported on the initial questionnaire. RESULTS: Thirteen months after symptom onset (i.e., about 6 mo after study entry) 61% of patients recalled the symptom-onset date (within 1 mo) that they had reported at baseline; the proportion decreased to 39% at 31 months and 25% after 70 months. During this period, the proportion overestimating RA duration remained about 20%, but the proportion underestimating it increased from 23% at 13 months to 39% at 31 months, and to 50% after 56 months. Patients with longer disease duration, less disease activity, and higher pain levels tended to be less accurate. CONCLUSION: Accuracy of recall of RA symptom-onset date by patients tends to decline over a period of 5 years. This should be taken into consideration when enrolling patients, when interpreting the findings of early RA clinical trials, and when attempting to ascertain the presence of a window of therapeutic opportunity.
Authors: Kevin D Deane; Colin I O'Donnell; Wolfgang Hueber; Darcy S Majka; Ann A Lazar; Lezlie A Derber; William R Gilliland; Jess D Edison; Jill M Norris; William H Robinson; V Michael Holers Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2010-11
Authors: N Magarelli; F Simone; R Amelia; A Leone; S Bosello; G D'Antona; A Zoli; G Ferraccioli; L Bonomo Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2010-07-31 Impact factor: 3.469
Authors: Haoling H Weng; Veena K Ranganath; Dinesh Khanna; Myungshin Oh; Daniel E Furst; Grace S Park; David A Elashoff; John T Sharp; Richard H Gold; James B Peter; Harold E Paulus Journal: J Rheumatol Date: 2010-01-28 Impact factor: 4.666
Authors: Iris Eshed; Eugen Feist; Christian E Althoff; Marina Backhaus; Gerd R Burmester; Bernd Hamm; Kay-Geert A Hermann Journal: Clin Rheumatol Date: 2010-12-15 Impact factor: 2.980
Authors: Veena K Ranganath; Jeonglim Yoon; Dinesh Khanna; Grace S Park; Daniel E Furst; David A Elashoff; Damini Jawaheer; John T Sharp; Richard H Gold; Edward C Keystone; Harold E Paulus Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2007-05-01 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Irene C Huffnagel; Marcel G W Dijkgraaf; Georges E Janssens; Michel van Weeghel; Björn M van Geel; Bwee Tien Poll-The; Stephan Kemp; Marc Engelen Journal: Orphanet J Rare Dis Date: 2019-02-07 Impact factor: 4.123
Authors: N Adib; K Hyrich; J Thornton; M Lunt; J Davidson; J Gardner-Medwin; H Foster; E Baildam; L Wedderburn; W Thomson Journal: Rheumatology (Oxford) Date: 2008-04-16 Impact factor: 7.580