| Literature DB >> 20110334 |
Larissa Fabritz1, Dierk Damke, Markus Emmerich, Susann G Kaufmann, Kathrin Theis, Andreas Blana, Lisa Fortmüller, Sandra Laakmann, Sven Hermann, Elena Aleynichenko, Johannes Steinfurt, Daniela Volkery, Burkhard Riemann, Uwe Kirchhefer, Michael R Franz, Günter Breithardt, Edward Carmeliet, Michael Schäfers, Sebastian K G Maier, Peter Carmeliet, Paulus Kirchhof.
Abstract
AIMS: Clinical observations in patients with long QT syndrome carrying sodium channel mutations (LQT3) suggest that bradycardia caused by parasympathetic stimulation may provoke torsades de pointes (TdP). Beta-adrenoceptor blockers appear less effective in LQT3 than in other forms of the disease. METHODS ANDEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20110334 PMCID: PMC2883895 DOI: 10.1093/cvr/cvq029
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cardiovasc Res ISSN: 0008-6363 Impact factor: 10.787
Heart rate, sinus pauses, and AV block in unrestrained mice at baseline and effect of acute and chronic interventions
| Baseline | Propranolol | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WT | ΔKPQ-SCN5A | WT | ΔKPQ-SCN5A | |
| Mean heart rate (HR) 24 h | 548 ± 47(16) | 498 ± 52*(18) | 489 ± 33***(13) | 474 ± 40*,***(15) |
| HR variability SD-HR | 76 ± 15(16) | 86 ± 15(18) | 57 ± 13***(13) | 64 ± 14***(15) |
| HR 10 am - 6 pm (at rest) | 505 ± 20**(16) | 451 ± 24*,**(18) | 464 ± 20**,***(13) | 446 ± 22*,**(15) |
| HR swim stress | 705 ± 35**(10) | 677 ± 22*,**(13) | 555 ± 54**,***(10) | 539 ± 32**,***(13) |
| HR air jet stress | 678 ± 35**(10) | 640 ± 44*,**(13) | 583 ± 37**,***(10) | 550 ± 57**,***(13) |
| HR isoproterenol i.p. | 725 ± 41**(11) | 694 ± 35*,**(14) | 699 ± 71**(4) | 710 ± 26**(4) |
| HR atropine i.p. | 641 ± 42**(3) | 612 ± 68**(6) | no value | no value |
| HR carbachol i.p. | 223 ± 38**(7) | 230 ± 51**(9) | 190 ± 21**(4) | 240 ± 46**(4) |
| HR carbachol i.p. prior ES | 207 ± 40**(4) | 210 ± 54**(8) | 180 ± 24**(4) | 207 ± 43**(6) |
| AVB or pauses/5 min/24 h | 1.4 ± 1.3(6) | 3.1 ± 1.8*(6) | 1.7 ± 1.4(6) | 2.5 ± 1.4*(6) |
| Max pause (ms cycle length) | 227(6) | 601(6) | 489(5) | 993(6) |
Mean ± SD of heart rates (n of mice in brackets) in unrestrained ΔKPQ-SCN5A and littermate WT mice at baseline and during chronic oral propranolol treatment. Pauses or AV block numbers were determined as mean of 24 5-min-time periods over 24 consecutive hours per animal.
b.p.m., beats per minute; HR, variability SD-HR standard deviation of heart rate; i.p., intraperitoneal (time 2–12 min after i.p. injection was analysed, only sinus beats counted); ES, extrasystole (10 beats prior to first ES or arrhythmia analysed); AVB, atrioventricular block.
*P < 0.05 ΔKPQ-SCN5A vs. WT.
**P < 0.05 heart rate vs. respective 24 h heart rate.
***P < 0.05 baseline vs. propranolol.
ECG parameters in unrestrained ΔKPQ-SCN5A and WT mice
| PQ duration (ms) | QT interval (ms) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WT | ΔKPQ-SCN5A | WT | ΔKPQ-SCN5A | ||
| Baseline | 600 b.p.m. | 32.5 ± 0.7 | 32.6 ± 0.6 | 48.9 ± 0.9 | 53.1 ± 0.7* |
| 450 b.p.m. | 34.7 ± 0.6 | 35.8 ± 0.6 | 55.6 ± 1.4 | 62.5 ± 1.3* | |
| 13(13) | 23(23) | 13(13) | 23(23) | ||
| Propranolol | 600 b.p.m. | 29.7 ± 1.0** | 32.6 ± 0.5* | 50.0 ± 2.0 | 54.8 ± 1.0 |
| 450 b.p.m. | 32.1 ± 1.2 | 35.1 ± 0.7* | 55.6 ± 1.2 | 63.0 ± 1.7* | |
| 5(5) | 11(11) | 5(5) | 11(11) | ||
| Carbachol i.p. mono | 200 b.p.m. | 33.4 ± 0.9 | 38.3 ± 0.9* | 104.0 ± 3.7** | 129.7 ± 4.2*,** |
| 14(10) | 18(16) | 14(10) | 18(16) | ||
| Carbachol i.p. +propranolol | 200 b.p.m. | 36.3 ± 3.1 | 37.4 ± 1.2 | 108.8 ± 3.4** | 121.7 ± 4.9** |
| 5(4) | 7(5) | 5(4) | 7(5) | ||
| Carbachol i.p. + flecainide | 200 b.p.m. | 38.9 ± 1.5** | 44.2 ± 2.7** | 127.9 ± 4.0** | 133.8 ± 3.9** |
| 7(4) | 7(4) | 7(4) | 7(4) | ||
| Isoproterenol i.p. | 700 b.p.m. | 29.9 ± 0.5 | 31.5 ± 0.7 | 51.9 ± 0.8 | 51.9 ± 2.3 |
| 9(7) | 14(12) | 9(7) | 14(12) | ||
| Swim stress | 700 b.p.m. | 30.2 ± 1.8 | 26.5 ± 2.3 | 52.0 ± 5 | 40.4 ± 3.5 |
| 3(3) | 5(5) | 3(3) | 5(5) | ||
| Air jet stress | 700 b.p.m. | 29.7 ± 0.5 | 29.3 ± 1.7 | 53.5 ± 2.0 | 51.1 ± 2.4 |
| 3(3) | 5(5) | 3(3) | 5(5) | ||
Stable frequencies of at least 3 × 20 beats for generation of summary ECG potentials were selected (200–700 b.p.m.); n given as episodes analysed (n animals in brackets); mean ± SEM.
*P < 0.05 vs. WT.
**P<0.05 vs. baseline at 450 and 600 b.p.m.