| Literature DB >> 20109173 |
Katrin Kepp1, Elin Org, Siim Sõber, Piret Kelgo, Margus Viigimaa, Gudrun Veldre, Neeme Tõnisson, Peeter Juhanson, Margus Putku, Andreas Kindmark, Viktor Kozich, Maris Laan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Conserved non-coding regions (CNR) have been shown to harbor gene expression regulatory elements. Genetic variations in these regions may potentially contribute to complex disease susceptibility.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20109173 PMCID: PMC2832636 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2350-11-15
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Med Genet ISSN: 1471-2350 Impact factor: 2.103
Phenotypic characteristics of analyzed individuals
| HYPEST | CADCZ | Healthy Eastern | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | Cases | Controls | Cases | Controls | European individuals1 |
| No. of individuals | 470 | 652 | 257 | 413 | 1065 |
| Age (years)2 | 43.9 (13.0) | 39.0 (4.9) | 51.2 (8.1) | 49.5 (7.4) | 43.7 (9.7) |
| Body Mass Index (BMI) (kg/m2) | 28.7 (3.7) | 24.4 (3.3) | 27.9 (3.3) | 25.3 (3.1) | 24.7 (3.1) |
| Systolic blood pressure (SBP) (mmHg) | 143.2 (17.6) | 130.0 (22.7) | 136.6 (19.2) | 125.2 (14.0) | 128.5 (12.2) |
| Diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (mmHg) | 87.4 (10.6) | 81.0 (14.6) | 85.1 (11.3) | 80.3 (9.3) | 80.0 (8.2) |
| Total cholesterol (mmol/liter) | 5.6 (1.1) | 5.0 (1.4) | 5.4 (1.0) | 5.6 (1.0) | 5.4 (1.1) |
| High-density lipoprotein (HDL) (mmol/liter) | 1.5 (0.4) | 1.7 (0.5) | 1.2 (0.3) | 1.5 (0.4) | 1.5 (0.4) |
| Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) (mmol/liter) | 3.8 (1.0) | 3.3 (1.1) | 3.2 (0.8) | 3.4 (0.9) | 3.3 (0.9) |
| Triacylglycerols (mmol/liter) | 1.8 (1.6) | 0.8 (0.3) | 2.1 (1.3) | 1.5 (1.1) | 1.2 (1.1) |
| Intima media thickness (IMT) | NA | NA | 0.7 (0.2) | 0.6 (0.2) | NA |
| Heart Rate (HR) (bpm) | NA | 71.0 (26.4) | 76.0 (5.6) | 74.8 (5.5) | 74.0 (8.6) |
| Medication: | |||||
| % of antihypertensive treatment | 75.3% | 0% | 54.5% | 0% | 0% |
| % of antilipidemic treatment | 20.2% | 0% | 58.4% | 0% | 0% |
1Pooled HYPEST and CADCZ control subjects, who had no personal history of cardiovascular disease, including essential hypertension, myocardial infarction, coronary artery disease, stroke, and had never been prescribed antihypertensive or other cardiovascular medications. Previously, no population differentiation was detected between HYPEST and CADCZ study subjects[18]
2Cases: age at the onset of the essential hypertension (HYPEST) or coronary artery disease (CADCZ); Controls: age at the recruitment
mmHg - millimeters of mercury; bpm - beats per minute; NA - not available
Polymorphisms detected by DHPLC in screened human NCX1 non-coding regions
| Analyzed regions | Detected variants1 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contig positions in Chr. 22 | Length (bp) | Location | Alleles3 | HYPEST | CADCZ | Validation/ | Targeted by genotyping platform5 |
| 40349616 | 293 | intron 2 | A/g | ND | 1/4 | novel | NA |
| 40335702-40335701 | 348 | intron 2 | 14 bp indel6 | 0/3 | 0/7 | rs112748046 | NA |
| 40335650 | 348 | intron 2 | C/g | 0/1 | 0/1 | novel | NA |
| 40407194 | 387 | intron 2 | C/g | 0/1 | 1/3 | rs72943138 | Illumina |
| 40277948 | 370 | intron 2 | T/c | 3/6 | 0/2 | rs449383 | Affymetrix GeneChip |
| 40475254 | 469 | intron 2 | A/t | 3/9 | 0/1 | rs2192773 | Illumina |
| 40301091 | 292 | intron 2 | a/G | ND | 1/1 | rs2540904 | Illumina |
| 40246617 | 282 | intron 4 | T/c | ND | 0/1 | novel | NA |
| 40514809 | 489 | intron 10 | A/g | 3/9 | 0/5 | rs4952414 | Illumina |
| 40514961 | 489 | intron 10 | c/T | 0/1 | ND | rs17026003 | Affymetrix GeneChip |
1Polymorphism screening was performed using HYPEST (n = 22) and CADCZ (n = 24) cases. Detailed description of all targeted genomic regions and detected variants is given in additional file 1.
2Contig positions and rs-numbers of the validated SNPs are given according to the Simple Nucleotide Polymorphisms database (dbSNP build 129; Human Genome March 2006).
3Major and minor alleles are indicated with capital and lower case letters, respectively.
4Number of number of homozygotes/heterozygotes (hom/het) of each identified polymorphism among the screened individuals
5Commercial genotyping platforms, which include the described variants (according to NCBI database)
6the 14 bp indel: CATTCCCTCTCCAT/-
ND - not detected; NA - not available
Figure 1Detection of alternative genotype variants of human . DGGE was performed using 9% polyacrylamide gel in 0.5 × TAE buffer containing 30-85% denaturing gradient of ureumformamide. Electrophoresis conditions were 58°C, 12 h and 140 V.
Distribution of insertion/deletion variants identified in the NCX1 intron 2 hypervariable region
| HYPEST | CADCZ | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cases | Controls | Cases | Controls | All | |
| Number of studied individuals | 470 | 652 | 257 | 413 | 1792 |
| WT homozygote | 379 (80.6%) | 513 (78.7%) | 192 (74.7%) | 356 (86.2%) | 1440 |
| 14 bp indel heterozygote | 68 (14.5%) | 117 (18.9%) | 55 (21.4%) | 53 (12.8%) | 293 |
| 14 bp indel/C = >G compound heterozygote | 8 (1.7%) | 8 (1.2%) | 5 (1.9%) | 3 (0.7%) | 24 |
| 14 bp indel homozygote | 3 (0.6%) | 1 | 2 (0.8%) | 1 | 7 |
| 43 bp del heterozygote | 10 (2.1%) | 10 (1.5%) | 1 | 0 | 21 |
| 40 bp duplication | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 14 bp indel/43 bp del compound heterozygote | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 5 bp del heterozygote | 1 | 2 (0.3%) | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| 10 bp del heterozygote | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
1Exact sequences of detected alleles are given in Figure 2.
n = number of carriers of the genotype; indel - insertion/deletion; del - deletion
Figure 2The human : (a) Genomic structure shown in arbitrary scale (adapted from [8]; (b) Hypervariable region within intron 2 (348 bp): identified human variants mapped on human-chimpanzee-macaque DNA sequence alignment. The human polymorphisms (C = >G SNP, 43 bp deletion, 10 bp deletion, 40 bp duplication, 14 bp indel and 5 bp deletion) are highlighted by arrows and in bold. Duplicons A and B of the 40 bp duplication are indicated in italics. Indel hotspot motifs GTAAG (reverse strand: CATTC; [36,43] are underlined and enclosed in the brackets.
Association between cardiovascular disease and NCX1 intronic 14 bp indel rs11274804
| Minor allele | Association testing using logistic regression1 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| frequency (%) | Additive model | Dominant model | ||||||
| Disease | Sample | Sample size | Cases | Controls | P-value | OR [95%CI] | P-value | OR [95%CI] |
| Essential hypertension | HYPEST | 470/652 | 7.76 | 9.04 | 0.14 | 0.70 | 0.09 | 0.65 |
| Coronary artery disease | CADCZ | 257/413 | 12.45 | 7.02 | 2.02 | 2.07 | ||
| Coronary artery disease & metabolic syndrome | CADCZ | 88/361 | 15.07 | 7.64 | 2.34 | 2.41 | ||
1Logistic regression analysis was performed with the following covariates: sex, age, BMI.
2Detailed definition of cases and controls for essential hypertension, coronary artery disease and metabolic syndrome is given in Materials and Methods, as well as in additional file 2.
Significant differences have been highlighted in bold, P < 0.05.
Association between cardiovascular parameters and the carrier status of the 14 bp indel in NCX1 intron 2
| Association testing using linear regression1 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WT/WT | WT/ | indel/ | Additive model | Dominant model | |||||
| Sample | n | Mean (± SD) | Mean (± SD) | Mean (± SD) | P-value | Effect (SE) | P-value | Effect (SE) | |
| SBP (mmHg)2 | HYPEST | 997 | 140.7 (21.19) | 141.4 (22.93) | 168.7 (36.14) | 0.31 | 1.50 (1.47) | 0.45 | 1.14 (1.52) |
| CADCZ | 670 | 132.4 (20.29) | 134.1 (22.00) | 135.0 (18.03) | 0.44 | 1.43 (1.85) | 0.42 | 1.54 (1.92) | |
| Meta-analysis | 1667 | 137.4 (21.23) | 138.4 (22.80) | 151.8 (31.51) | 0.20 | 1.47 (1.15) | 0.28 | 1.29 (1.19) | |
| Healthy subjects3 | 1048 | 128.5 (5.66) | 128.0 (10.53) | 136.5 (9.19) | 0.47 | -0.71 (0.98) | 0.39 | -0.86 (0.99) | |
| DBP (mmHg)2 | HYPEST | 993 | 86.9 (12.67) | 87.2 (13.31) | 104.3 (22.28) | 0.39 | 0.82 (0.95) | 0.57 | 0.55 (0.98) |
| CADCZ | 669 | 84.2 (11.51) | 84.1 (15.45) | 86.7 (11.55) | 0.71 | 0.39 (1.07) | 0.73 | 0.38 (1.11) | |
| Meta-analysis | 1662 | 85.8 (12.29) | 85.9 (14.29) | 95.5 (18.59) | 0.38 | 0.63 (0.71) | 0.51 | 0.48 (0.74) | |
| Healthy subjects3 | 1048 | 81.4 (1.41) | 80.5 (7.85) | 85.0 (7.07) | 0.11 | -1.06 (0.66) | 0.08 | -1.15 (0.67) | |
| Heart rate (bpm) | CADCZ | 670 | 75.1 (5.51) | 76.2 (5.83) | 69.3 (3.06) | 0.15 | 0.79 (0.54) | 0.07 | 1.03 (0.56) |
| Healthy subjects3 | 833 | 75.0 (8.49) | 73.3 (8.06) | 70.0 (0.00) | -1.61 (0.79) | -1.60 (0.80) | |||
| IMT | CADCZ | 670 | 0.63 (0.20) | 0.65 (0.20) | 0.87 (0.29) | 0.20 | 0.03 (0.02) | 0.33 | 0.02 (0.02) |
| CADCZ controls | 413 | 0.58 (0.17) | 0.54 (0.15) | 1.20 (0.00) | 0.42 | -0.02 (0.02) | 0.18 | -0.03 (0.02) | |
1For association analysis with SBP and DBP regression testing for a linear trend of marker alleles was performed with age, sex and BMI as covariates. Association analysis with heart rate was performed with sex as covariate, and intima-media thickness without covariates.
2Correction for antihypertensive treatment was implemented to all treated patients as described[25].
3Pooled HYPEST and CADCZ control subjects, who had no personal history of cardiovascular disease, including essential hypertension, myocardial infarction, coronary artery disease, stroke, and had never been prescribed cardiovascular medications. Previously, no population differentiation was detected between HYPEST and CADCZ study subjects[18]
n - number of individuals; IMT - Intima-media thickness; Significant differences have been highlighted in bold, p < 0.05
Association between serum lipid biomarkers and the carrier status of the 14 bp indel in NCX1 intron 2
| Association testing using linear regression1 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WT/WT | WT/indel | indel/ | Additive model | Dominant model | |||||
| n | Mean (± SD) | Mean (± SD) | Mean (± SD) | P-value | Effect (SE) | P-value | Effect (SE) | ||
| Total cholesterol | HYPEST | 459 | 5.92 (1.15) | 5.85 (1.24) | 6.40 (2.47) | 0.86 | -0.02 (0.14) | 0.73 | -0.05 (0.15) |
| (mmol/L) | CADCZ | 670 | 5.50 (1.04) | 5.48 (0.99) | 5.55 (0.83) | 0.11 | 0.17 (0.11) | 0.14 | 0.17 (0.11) |
| Meta-analysis | 1129 | 5.67 (1.10) | 5.63 (1.10) | 5.98 (1.71) | 0.25 | 0.10 (0.09) | 0.33 | 0.09 (0.09) | |
| Healthy subjects3 | 431 | 5.59 (1.07) | 5.36 (0.98) | 6.37 (0.00) | 0.18 | -0.19 (0.14) | 0.14 | -0.22 (0.15) | |
| HDL (mmol/L) | HYPEST | 458 | 1.52 (0.42) | 1.46 (0.42) | 1.38 (0.29) | 0.23 | -0.06 (0.05) | 0.24 | -0.06 (0.05) |
| CADCZ | 670 | 1.41 (0.39) | 1.41 (0.42) | 1.42 (0.29) | 0.81 | -0.009 (0.04) | 0.82 | -0.01 (0.04) | |
| Meta-analysis | 1128 | 1.45 (0.41) | 1.43 (0.42) | 1.40 (0.26) | 0.35 | -0.03 (0.03) | 0.37 | -0.03 (0.03) | |
| Healthy subjects3 | 431 | 1.52 (0.40) | 1.61 (0.45) | 1.70 (0.00) | 0.10 | 0.09 (0.05) | 0.10 | 0.09 (0.06) | |
| LDL (mmol/L) | HYPEST | 459 | 4.04 (1.03) | 4.04 (1.00) | 4.66 (2.58) | 0.73 | 0.04 (0.12) | 0.88 | 0.02 (0.13) |
| CADCZ | 651 | 3.33 (0.89) | 3.22 (0.85) | 3.22 (0.63) | 0.66 | -0.09 (0.20) | 0.57 | -0.12 (0.21) | |
| Meta-analysis | 1110 | 3.63 (1.01) | 3.54 (1.00) | 3.94 (1.85) | 0.94 | 0.01 (0.11) | 0.87 | -0.02 (0.11) | |
| Healthy subjects3 | 427 | 3.41 (0.91) | 3.13 (0.85) | 3.94 (0.00) | 0.06 | -0.23 (0.12) | -0.26 (0.13) | ||
| Tri-glycerides | HYPEST | 458 | 1.77 (1.66) | 1.82 (1.02) | 1.29 (0.53) | 0.99 | 0.003 (0.19) | 0.89 | 0.03 (0.20) |
| (mmol/L) | CADCZ | 670 | 1.72 (1.19) | 1.94 (1.27) | 2.00 (1.16) | 0.25 (0.12) | 0.26 (0.12) | ||
| Meta-analysis | 1128 | 1.74 (1.40) | 1.89 (1.18) | 1.65 (0.90) | 0.08 | 0.18 (0.10) | 0.07 | 0.19 (0.10) | |
| Healthy subjects3 | 431 | 1.52 (1.12) | 1.40 (0.81) | 1.62 (0.00) | 0.44 | -0.11 (0.15) | 0.42 | -0.12 (0.15) | |
1For association analysis with serum lipids regression testing for a linear trend of marker alleles was performed with age, sex and BMI as covariates.
2Correction for the treatment with lipid-lowering medication was implemented as described[24].
3Pooled HYPEST and CADCZ control subjects with available records for serum lipids. The individuals had no personal history of cardiovascular disease, including essential hypertension, myocardial infarction, coronary artery disease, stroke, and had never been prescribed cardiovascular medications. Previously, no population differentiation was detected between HYPEST and CADCZ study subjects[18]
n - number of individuals; Significant differences have been highlighted in bold, p < 0.05