Literature DB >> 20108143

Totally laparoscopic right colectomy with transvaginal specimen extraction: the authors' initial institutional experience.

Shaun McKenzie1, Jeong-Heum Baek, Mark Wakabayashi, Julio Garcia-Aguilar, Alessio Pigazzi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The persistence of early and delayed wound complications related to both open and laparoscopic colectomy remains a significant health burden. Furthermore, as interest in natural orifice translumenal endosurgery (NOTES) continues to grow, bridging techniques may help to attenuate the learning curve associated with NOTES. The authors present their technique and short-term outcomes for totally laparoscopic right colectomy with transvaginal specimen extraction in a series of four patients.
METHODS: Four consecutive patients from a prospectively maintained laparoscopic colectomy database were analyzed under an institutional review board-approved protocol. Clinicopathologic characteristics and short-term outcomes were reviewed.
RESULTS: All the patients were women with no prior pelvic surgery. A four-trocar laparoscopic right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis was performed for cancer in two cases and for adenomatous polyp in two cases. Transvaginal extraction was possible in all cases. The average operating room time was 212.25 min. No patient experienced complications associated with the colpotomy; nor did any patient have pain or drainage from the extraction site postoperatively. The median hospital stay was 4.5 days. One patient experienced a bowel obstruction unrelated to the extraction site. The mean specimen length was 27 cm, and the mean number of lymph nodes retrieved was 15.75.
CONCLUSION: Totally laparoscopic right colectomy with transvaginal extraction appears to be safe and feasible. This technique may provide both an attractive way to reduce abdominal wall morbidity and a bridge to NOTES colon surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20108143     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-009-0870-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  17 in total

1.  Wound complications of laparoscopic vs open colectomy.

Authors:  E R Winslow; J W Fleshman; E H Birnbaum; L M Brunt
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-06-27       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for the surgical staging of endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Chung K Wong; Yuen H Wong; Leslie S F Lo; Chark M Tai; Tai K Ng
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.730

Review 3.  Systematic review on the short-term outcome of laparoscopic resection for colon and rectosigmoid cancer.

Authors:  J J Tjandra; M K Y Chan
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.788

4.  Should completely intracorporeal anastomosis be considered in obese patients who undergo laparoscopic colectomy for benign or malignant disease of the colon?

Authors:  Ioannis Raftopoulos; Anita P Courcoulas; David Blumberg
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2006-09-06       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  Feasibility and efficacy of laparoscopic management of ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Un Suk Jung; Jung Hun Lee; Min Sun Kyung; Joong Sub Choi
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.730

6.  Transvaginal extraction of the specimen after total laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis.

Authors:  Morris E Franklin; Harmon Kelley; Margaret Kelley; Loretta Brestan; Guillermo Portillo; Jeslia Torres
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.719

7.  Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy versus abdominal radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: our experience.

Authors:  Mario Malzoni; Raffaele Tinelli; Francesco Cosentino; Annarita Fusco; Carmine Malzoni
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 8.  Training on N.O.T.E.S.: from history we learn.

Authors:  M Al-Akash; E Boyle; W A Tanner
Journal:  Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-12-19       Impact factor: 3.279

9.  Transvaginal endoscopic cholecystectomy in human beings: preliminary results.

Authors:  Antonello Forgione; Dario Maggioni; Fabio Sansonna; Carlo Ferrari; Stefano Di Lernia; Davide Citterio; Carmelo Magistro; Luigi Frigerio; Raffaele Pugliese
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.878

Review 10.  N.O.T.E.S.: the progression of a novel and emerging technique.

Authors:  M Al-Akash; E Boyle; W A Tanner
Journal:  Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 3.279

View more
  31 in total

1.  Totally laparoscopic colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis achieved using a laparoscopic linear stapler: experience of a single institute.

Authors:  Tetsuo Ikeda; Akira Kabasima; Naoyuki Ueda; Yusuke Yonemura; Mizuki Ninomiya; Mako Nogami; Kyuzo Fujii; Kojiro Mashino; Hideya Tashiro; Hisanobu Sakata
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  [Transvaginal access for NOTES].

Authors:  C Zornig; H Mofid; L Siemssen; C H Wenck
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Right colectomy: is it a safe and feasible totally laparoscopic approach with transvaginal specimen extraction.

Authors:  Christof Hottenrott
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Laparoscopic resection with natural orifice specimen extraction versus conventional laparoscopy for colorectal disease: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Bin Ma; Xuan-Zhang Huang; Peng Gao; Jun-Hua Zhao; Yong-Xi Song; Jing-Xu Sun; Xiao-Wan Chen; Zhen-Ning Wang
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 5.  Transvaginal specimen removal in minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  Panagiotis Kallidonis; Vasilis Panagopoulos; Iason Kyriazis; Marinos Vasilas; Evangelos Liatsikos
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-01-30       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Single-incision laparoscopic right colectomy for cancer: a single-centre preliminary experience.

Authors:  Dario Pietrasanta; Nicola Romano; Valerio Prosperi; Luca Lorenzetti; Giancarlo Basili; Orlando Goletti
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2010-09-25

7.  Totally laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy with transanal specimen extraction.

Authors:  Atsushi Nishimura; Mikako Kawahara; Kazuyoshi Suda; Shigeto Makino; Yasuyuki Kawachi; Keiya Nikkuni
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-05-07       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  A new technique of totally laparoscopic resection with natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) for large rectal adenoma.

Authors:  X-M Zhang; Z Wang; H-R Hou; Z-X Zhou
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2015-04-04       Impact factor: 3.781

9.  Totally laparoscopic resection with natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) has more advantages comparing with laparoscopic-assisted resection for selected patients with sigmoid colon or rectal cancer.

Authors:  Zhang Xingmao; Zhou Haitao; Liang Jianwei; Hou Huirong; Hu Junjie; Zhou Zhixiang
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Laparoscopic right colectomy with transvaginal extraction in a patient with prior pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  M A Yagci; C Kayaalp; K Kutluturk
Journal:  G Chir       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.