Literature DB >> 20108122

Predictors of survival in periampullary cancers following pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Ioannis Hatzaras1, Nathaniel George, Peter Muscarella, W Scott Melvin, E Christopher Ellison, Mark Bloomston.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cancers of the ampulla of Vater, distal common bile duct, and pancreas are known to have dismal prognosis. It is often reported that ampullary cancers are less aggressive relative to the other periampullary carcinomas. We sought to evaluate predictors of survival for periampullary cancers following pancreaticoduodenectomy to identify biologic behavior.
METHODS: We reviewed the records of all patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary carcinoma between 1992 and 2007 at the Ohio State University Medical Center. Demographics, treatment, and outcome/survival data were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were created and compared by log-rank analysis. Multivariate analysis was undertaken using Cox proportional-hazards method.
RESULTS: 346 consecutive periampullary malignancies (249 pancreatic cancers, 79 ampullary carcinomas, 18 extrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas) treated by pancreaticoduodenectomy were identified. Pancreatic cancer histology correlated with the shortest median survival (17.1 months), followed by cholangiocarcinoma (17.9 months) and ampullary carcinoma (44.3 months) (P < 0.001). Potential predictors of decreased survival on univariate analysis included site of origin, preoperative jaundice, microscopic positive margin, nodal metastasis, lymphovascular invasion, neural invasion, and poor differentiation. Only nodal metastasis (median 16.2 versus 29.9 months, P < 0.001) and neural invasion (median 17.7 versus 47.9 months, P < 0.00001) significantly predicted outcome on multivariate analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: Although ampullary cancers have the best prognosis overall, when controlled for tumor stage, only presence of neural invasion and nodal metastasis predict poor survival following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Biological behavior remains the most important prognostic indicator in periampullary cancers amenable to resection, regardless of site of origin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20108122      PMCID: PMC2861840          DOI: 10.1245/s10434-009-0883-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  24 in total

Review 1.  Neural invasion in pancreatic carcinoma.

Authors:  Bin Liu; Kui-Yang Lu
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int       Date:  2002-08

2.  Most pancreatic cancer resections are R1 resections.

Authors:  Irene Esposito; Jörg Kleeff; Frank Bergmann; Caroline Reiser; Esther Herpel; Helmut Friess; Peter Schirmacher; Markus W Büchler
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-03-20       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  A margin-negative R0 resection accomplished with minimal postoperative complications is the surgeon's contribution to long-term survival in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Thomas J Howard; Joseph E Krug; Jian Yu; Nick J Zyromski; C Max Schmidt; Lewis E Jacobson; James A Madura; Eric A Wiebke; Keith D Lillemoe
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Redefining resection margin status in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Caroline S Verbeke; Krishna V Menon
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.647

5.  Factors influencing survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  J L Cameron; D W Crist; J V Sitzmann; R H Hruban; J K Boitnott; A J Seidler; J Coleman
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Cyclin D1 and bax influence the prognosis after pancreatoduodenectomy for periampullary adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Ales Tomazic; Vladislav Pegan; Ksaverija Ferlan-Marolt; Alojz Pleskovic; Bostjan Luzar
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec

7.  Resected periampullary adenocarcinoma: 5-year survivors and their 6- to 10-year follow-up.

Authors:  Taylor S Riall; John L Cameron; Keith D Lillemoe; Jordan M Winter; Kurtis A Campbell; Ralph H Hruban; David Chang; Charles J Yeo
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2006-08-28       Impact factor: 3.982

8.  The role of venous and neural invasion on survival in rectal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  A Horn; O Dahl; I Morild
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Periampullary adenocarcinoma: analysis of 5-year survivors.

Authors:  C J Yeo; T A Sohn; J L Cameron; R H Hruban; K D Lillemoe; H A Pitt
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Lymph node metastases in carcinoma of the head of the pancreas region.

Authors:  A Nakao; A Harada; T Nonami; T Kaneko; H Murakami; S Inoue; Y Takeuchi; H Takagi
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  50 in total

1.  Tumor invasion of muscular vessels predicts poor prognosis in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who have received neoadjuvant therapy and pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Deyali Chatterjee; Asif Rashid; Hua Wang; Matthew H Katz; Robert A Wolff; Gauri R Varadhachary; Jeffrey E Lee; Peter W Pisters; Henry F Gomez; James L Abbruzzese; Jason B Fleming; Huamin Wang
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 6.394

2.  Prognostic factors of carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater after surgery.

Authors:  Jianguo Zhou; Qian Zhang; Peng Li; Yi Shan; Dongbing Zhao; Jianqiang Cai
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2013-09-12

3.  Immunohistochemical Predictors for Intestinal and Pancreatobiliary Types of Adenocarcinoma of The Ampulla of Vater.

Authors:  João Paulo Lemos da Silveira Santos; Carla Jorge Machado; Eduardo Paulino Junior; João Bernardo Sancio Rocha Rodrigues; Paula Teixeira Vidigal; Vivian Resende
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Tumor budding as a strong prognostic indicator in invasive ampullary adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Nobuyuki Ohike; Ipek Coban; Grace E Kim; Olca Basturk; Takuma Tajiri; Alyssa Krasinskas; Sudeshna Bandyopadhyay; Toshio Morohoshi; Yuki Shimada; David A Kooby; Charles A Staley; Michael Goodman; N Volkan Adsay; Nazmi Volkan Adsay
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 6.394

Review 5.  Ampullary cancer: an overview.

Authors:  Daniel H Ahn; Tanios Bekaii-Saab
Journal:  Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book       Date:  2014

6.  Factors affecting survival in patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary cancers.

Authors:  Temel Deniz Şeren; Koray Topgül; Bülent Koca; Kenan Erzurumlu
Journal:  Ulus Cerrahi Derg       Date:  2015-06-01

7.  Prognostic Impact of Pancreatic Invasion in Duodenal Carcinoma: A Single-Center Experience.

Authors:  Nobuhito Nitta; Katsuhisa Ohgi; Teiichi Sugiura; Yukiyasu Okamura; Takaaki Ito; Yusuke Yamamoto; Ryo Ashida; Keiko Sasaki; Katsuhiko Uesaka
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Impact of adjuvant chemotherapy after pancreaticoduodenectomy for distal cholangiocarcinoma: a propensity score analysis from a French multicentric cohort.

Authors:  Damien Bergeat; Olivier Turrini; Laetitia Courtin-Tanguy; Stéphanie Truant; Benjamin Darnis; Jean Robert Delpero; Jean-Yves Mabrut; Nicolas Regenet; Laurent Sulpice
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 3.445

9.  Prediction of Survival Following Percutaneous Biliary Drainage for Malignant Biliary Obstruction.

Authors:  Wa'el Tuqan; Ayoub Innabi; Alia Alawneh; Fadi Abu Farsakh; Maan Al-Khatib
Journal:  J Transl Int Med       Date:  2017-06-30

10.  Large retroperitoneal paraganglioma concurrent with periampullary adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Seyed Mohammadreza Hakimian; Azar Naimi; Seyed Mohammadhasan Emami; Golnar Rozatii; Vahid Goharian
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.852

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.