Literature DB >> 20107798

Use of rigid nephroscope for laparoscopic common bile duct exploration-a single-center experience.

Muneer Khan1, Syed Javid Farooq Qadri, Syed Sajad Nazir.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Increasingly, laparoscopic biliary surgeons are undertaking laparoscopic cholecystectomy and laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for patients with cholelithiasis and choledocholithiasis. In laparoscopic common bile duct exploration a flexible choledochoscope is ordinarily used, and with this instrument the surgeon usually fails to remove large impacted stones. In contrast with use of a rigid nephroscope it is possible to remove all common bile duct stones irrespective of size and degree of impaction. The present study evaluates the efficiency of rigid nephroscope for managing common bile duct stones laparoscopically.
METHODS: In the present study laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for stones was performed in 80 patients via standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy port sites. Patients with a common bile duct diameter >10 mm were included in this study. The rigid nephroscope was passed through the epigastric port and negotiated into the common bile duct through a choledochotomy. Stones were removed with graspers. Large hard stones were fragmented by pneumatic lithotripsy.
RESULTS: Of the 80 patients treated in this manner, 72 (90%) had multiple common bile duct calculi, and 8 (10%) had a solitary common bile duct calculus. Mean common bile duct diameter was 15.3 mm (range: 10-37 mm). Conversion to open common bile duct exploration was necessary in 1 case (1.25%) because of difficult dissection secondary to extensive dense adhesions. In 7 patients (8.75%) a pneumatic lithotripter was used to fragment stones. Choledochotomy was managed by placing a T-tube in 21 (26.25%) patients, by effecting primary closure in 58 (72.5%) patients, and by choledochoduodenostomy in 1 (1.25%) patient. The mean operative time in this series was 83 min (range: 53-135 min). The mean postoperative hospital stay was 4.2 days (range: 3-19 days). One patient (1.25%) developed cholangitis 5 months after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration; the cause was a residual common bile duct stone.
CONCLUSIONS: A rigid nephroscope can be used for managing all types of common bile duct calculi irrespective of site, size, composition, or degree of impaction. Its use can be expected to become the standard for laparoscopic common bile duct exploration, especially for removing large calculi from a dilated common bile duct.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20107798     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-010-0397-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  27 in total

1.  Comparison of laparoscopic choledochotomy closure techniques.

Authors:  J S Wu; N J Soper
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-06-14       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Acute gallstone pancreatitis and endoscopic therapy.

Authors:  D L Carr-Locke
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 10.093

3.  The use of ERCP in the management of common bile duct stones in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  G C Vitale; G M Larson; T J Wieman; W G Cheadle; F B Miller
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1993 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Endoscopic management of bile duct stones; (apples and oranges).

Authors:  P B Cotton
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Changes in biliary bacteria after endoscopic cholangiography and sphincterotomy.

Authors:  J Sand; I Airo; K M Hiltunen; J Mattila; I Nordback
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 0.688

6.  Cost-effective management of complicated choledocholithiasis: laparoscopic transcystic duct exploration or endoscopic sphincterotomy.

Authors:  M A Liberman; E H Phillips; B J Carroll; M J Fallas; R Rosenthal; J Hiatt
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  Choledochotomy for biliary lithiasis: T-tube drainage or primary closure. Effects on postoperative bacteremia and T-tube bile infection.

Authors:  N J Lygidakis
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with endoscopic sphincterotomy and stone extraction or laparoscopic choledochoscopy and electrohydraulic lithotripsy for management of cholelithiasis with choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  M E Arregui; C J Davis; A M Arkush; R F Nagan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1992 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Primary duct closure versus T-tube drainage following exploration of the common bile duct.

Authors:  J A Williams; P J Treacy; P Sidey; C S Worthley; N C Townsend; E A Russell
Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg       Date:  1994-12

10.  Risk of extrahepatic bileduct cancer after cholecystectomy.

Authors:  A Ekbom; C C Hsieh; J Yuen; D Trichopoulos; J K McLaughlin; S J Lan; H O Adami
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-11-20       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  4 in total

1.  Changing approaches to cholecystectomy in elderly patients: a 10-year retrospective study in Taiwan.

Authors:  Hon-Yi Shi; King-Teh Lee; Yih-Huei Uen; Chong-Chi Chiu; Hao-Hsien Lee
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Use of rigid tubal ligation scope: Serendipity in laparoscopic common bile duct exploration.

Authors:  Manash Ranjan Sahoo; Anil Kumar Thimmegowda; Syama Sundar Behera
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.407

Review 3.  Percutaneous treatment of complex biliary stone disease using endourological technique and literature review.

Authors:  Fernando Korkes; Ariê Carneiro; Felipe Nasser; Breno Boueri Affonso; Francisco Leonardo Galastri; Marcos Belotto de Oliveira; Antônio Luiz de Vasconcellos Macedo
Journal:  Einstein (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2015-06-09

4.  Laparoscopic Choledochotomy in a Solitary Common Duct Stone: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  K B Deo; S Adhikary; S Khaniya; V C Shakya; C S Agrawal
Journal:  Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2018-05-14
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.