Literature DB >> 20107775

Accuracy of 3 T MR angioraphy in vertebral artery stenosis and coincidence with other cerebrovascular stenoses.

Hyun Seok Choi1, Dong Ik Kim, Dong Joon Kim, Jinna Kim, Eun Soo Kim, Seung-Koo Lee.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Ostium of vertebral artery (VA) is a common site of pseudostenosis on contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CE-MRA). The purpose of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of CE-MRA at 3 T in the evaluation of ostial stenosis of VA and to find associated coincidental stenoses using logistic regression analysis.
METHODS: One hundred and thirty-five VA ostial regions from 72 patients who received CE-MRA of neck vessels, intracranial time of flight (TOF) MRA, and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) were retrospectively reviewed. The sensitivity and specificity of the CE-MRA in detection of ostial stenosis were calculated with reference standard of DSA. Ostial stenosis on MRA was correlated with coincidental lesions in intracranial and cervical arteries by logistic regression analysis.
RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of the CE-MRA were 100% and 80.4% for detection of significant stenosis. In case of significant stenoses, CE-MRA showed a tendency of overestimation with a false-positive rate of 52.5%. Logistic regression analysis showed that the stenoses of middle cerebral artery (MCA) on TOF MRA was associated with significant stenoses of VA ostia (OR = 5.84, 95% confidence intervals 1.41-24.17).
CONCLUSION: CE-MRA is sensitive in detection of VA ostial stenosis although it has high false-positive rate. True positive ostial stenosis should be considered in cases of coincidental stenoses of MCA on TOF MRA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20107775     DOI: 10.1007/s00234-010-0655-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroradiology        ISSN: 0028-3940            Impact factor:   2.804


  23 in total

1.  Carotid artery stenosis: contrast-enhanced MR angiography with two different scan times compared with digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  P C Sundgren; P Sundén; A Lindgren; J Lanke; S Holtås; E-M Larsson
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2002-06-20       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  Prospective evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography and spiral CT angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  Juan Alvarez-Linera; Julián Benito-León; José Escribano; Jorge Campollo; Ricardo Gesto
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the carotid and vertebrobasilar circulations.

Authors:  Carina W Yang; James C Carr; Stephen F Futterer; Mark D Morasch; Benson P Yang; Stephanie M Shors; J Paul Finn
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 4.  Neurovascular imaging at 1.5 tesla versus 3.0 tesla.

Authors:  Benjamin Y Huang; Mauricio Castillo
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.266

5.  Time-of-flight MR angiography of carotid artery stenosis: does a flow void represent severe stenosis?

Authors:  Paul J Nederkoorn; Yolanda van der Graaf; Bert C Eikelboom; Aad van der Lugt; Lambertus W Bartels; Willem P T M Mali
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Prevalence study of proximal vertebral artery stenosis using high-resolution contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography.

Authors:  S H Kim; J S Lee; O K Kwon; M K Han; J H Kim
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.990

7.  Proximal great vessels of aortic arch: comparison of three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  Bruno Randoux; Beatrice Marro; Fabien Koskas; Jacques Chiras; Didier Dormont; Claude Marsault
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-10-16       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 8.  Imaging of vertebral artery stenosis: a systematic review.

Authors:  S Khan; G C Cloud; S Kerry; H S Markus
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 10.154

9.  Noninvasive detection of vertebral artery stenosis: a comparison of contrast-enhanced MR angiography, CT angiography, and ultrasound.

Authors:  Sofia Khan; Philip Rich; Andrew Clifton; Hugh S Markus
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 7.914

10.  Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional fast imaging with steady-state precession (FISP) MR angiography of supraaortic vessels: preliminary results.

Authors:  X Leclerc; P Martinat; O Godefroy; C Lucas; F Giboreau; G S Ares; D Leys; J P Pruvo
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.825

View more
  1 in total

1.  Increased risk for posterior circulation ischaemia in patients with vertebral artery hypoplasia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Aristeidis H Katsanos; Sotirios Giannopoulos
Journal:  Eur Stroke J       Date:  2017-03-20
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.