Literature DB >> 20107005

An oral versus intranasal prime/boost regimen using attenuated human rotavirus or VP2 and VP6 virus-like particles with immunostimulating complexes influences protection and antibody-secreting cell responses to rotavirus in a neonatal gnotobiotic pig model.

Marli S P Azevedo1, Ana Maria Gonzalez, Lijuan Yuan, Kwang-Il Jeong, Cristiana Iosef, Trang Van Nguyen, Karin Lovgren-Bengtsson, Bror Morein, Linda J Saif.   

Abstract

We determined the impact of mucosal prime/boost regimens and vaccine type (attenuated Wa human rotavirus [AttHRV] or nonreplicating Wa 2/6 rotavirus-like particles [VLP]) on protection and antibody-secreting cell (ASC) responses to HRV in a neonatal gnotobiotic pig disease model. Comparisons of delivery routes for AttHRV and evaluation of nonreplicating VLP vaccines are important as alternative vaccine approaches to overcome risks associated with live oral vaccines. Groups of neonatal gnotobiotic pigs were vaccinated using combinations of oral (PO) and intranasal (IN) inoculation routes as follows: (i) 3 oral doses of AttHRV (AttHRV3xPO); (ii) AttHRV3xIN; (iii) AttHRVPO, then 2/6VLP2xIN; (iv) AttHRVIN, then 2/6VLP2xIN; and (v) mock-inoculated controls. Subsets of pigs from each group were challenged with virulent Wa HRV [P1A(8) G1] (4 weeks post-primary inoculation) to assess protection. The AttHRVPO+2/6VLP2xIN pigs had the highest protection rates against virus shedding and diarrhea (71% each); however, these rates did not differ statistically among the vaccine groups, except for the AttHRVIN+2/6VLPIN group, which had a significantly lower protection rate (17%) against diarrhea. The isotype, magnitude, and tissue distribution of ASCs were analyzed by enzyme-linked immunospot assay. The highest mean numbers of virus-specific IgG and IgA ASCs were observed pre- and postchallenge in both intestinal and systemic lymphoid tissues of the AttHRVPO+2/6VLPIN group. Thus, the AttHRVPO+2/6VLPIN vaccine regimen using immunostimulating complexes (ISCOM) and multiple mucosal inductive sites, followed by AttHRV3xPO or IN regimens, were the most effective vaccine regimens, suggesting that either AttHRVPO+2/6VLPIN or AttHRV3xIN may be an alternative approach to AttHRV3xPO for inducing protective immunity against rotavirus diarrhea.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20107005      PMCID: PMC2837955          DOI: 10.1128/CVI.00395-09

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol        ISSN: 1556-679X


  44 in total

1.  Correlation of tissue distribution, developmental phenotype, and intestinal homing receptor expression of antigen-specific B cells during the murine anti-rotavirus immune response.

Authors:  Kenneth R Youngman; Manuel A Franco; Nelly A Kuklin; Lusijah S Rott; Eugene C Butcher; Harry B Greenberg
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2002-03-01       Impact factor: 5.422

2.  Distribution of rotavirus-specific memory B cells in gut-associated lymphoid tissue after primary immunization.

Authors:  Charlotte A Moser; Paul A Offit
Journal:  J Gen Virol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.891

3.  Immunogenicity and protective efficacy of rotavirus 2/6-virus-like particles produced by a dual baculovirus expression vector and administered intramuscularly, intranasally, or orally to mice.

Authors:  Andrea Bertolotti-Ciarlet; Max Ciarlet; Sue E Crawford; Margaret E Conner; Mary K Estes
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2003-09-08       Impact factor: 3.641

4.  Translational modifications to improve vaccine efficacy in an oral influenza vaccine.

Authors:  Ewan Bennett; Alexander B Mullen; Valerie A Ferro
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 3.608

5.  Systemic and intestinal antibody secreting cell responses and protection in gnotobiotic pigs immunized orally with attenuated Wa human rotavirus and Wa 2/6-rotavirus-like-particles associated with immunostimulating complexes.

Authors:  Cristiana Iosef; Trang Van Nguyen; Kwang il Jeong; Karin Bengtsson; Bror Morein; Yunjeong Kim; Kyeong Ok Chang; Marli S P Azevedo; Lijuan Yuan; Paul Nielsen; Linda J Saif
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2002-03-15       Impact factor: 3.641

6.  Group A rotavirus infection and age-dependent diarrheal disease in rats: a new animal model to study the pathophysiology of rotavirus infection.

Authors:  Max Ciarlet; Margaret E Conner; Milton J Finegold; Mary K Estes
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.103

7.  Circulating rotavirus-specific antibody-secreting cells (ASCs) predict the presence of rotavirus-specific ASCs in the human small intestinal lamina propria.

Authors:  K A Brown; J A Kriss; C A Moser; W J Wenner; P A Offit
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2000-09-05       Impact factor: 5.226

8.  Protective immunity and antibody-secreting cell responses elicited by combined oral attenuated Wa human rotavirus and intranasal Wa 2/6-VLPs with mutant Escherichia coli heat-labile toxin in gnotobiotic pigs.

Authors:  L Yuan; C Iosef; M S Azevedo; Y Kim; Y Qian; A Geyer; T V Nguyen; K O Chang; L J Saif
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.103

9.  Intranasal administration of 2/6-rotavirus-like particles with mutant Escherichia coli heat-labile toxin (LT-R192G) induces antibody-secreting cell responses but not protective immunity in gnotobiotic pigs.

Authors:  L Yuan; A Geyer; D C Hodgins; Z Fan; Y Qian; K O Chang; S E Crawford; V Parreño; L A Ward; M K Estes; M E Conner; L J Saif
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 10.  Induction of mucosal immune responses and protection against enteric viruses: rotavirus infection of gnotobiotic pigs as a model.

Authors:  Lijuan Yuan; Linda J Saif
Journal:  Vet Immunol Immunopathol       Date:  2002-09-10       Impact factor: 2.046

View more
  9 in total

1.  Evolution of P[8], P[4], and P[6] VP8* genes of human rotaviruses globally reported during 1974 and 2017: possible implications for rotavirus vaccines in development.

Authors:  Daniel E Velasquez; Baoming Jiang
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  Decreased performance of live attenuated, oral rotavirus vaccines in low-income settings: causes and contributing factors.

Authors:  Daniel E Velasquez; Umesh Parashar; Baoming Jiang
Journal:  Expert Rev Vaccines       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 5.217

Review 3.  Formulation technologies for oral vaccines.

Authors:  R R C New
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 4.  Rotavirus infection in children in Southeast Asia 2008-2018: disease burden, genotype distribution, seasonality, and vaccination.

Authors:  Fajar Budi Lestari; Sompong Vongpunsawad; Nasamon Wanlapakorn; Yong Poovorawan
Journal:  J Biomed Sci       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 8.410

Review 5.  The rotavirus vaccine development pipeline.

Authors:  Carl D Kirkwood; Lyou-Fu Ma; Megan E Carey; A Duncan Steele
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 6.  Advances in Oral Subunit Vaccine Design.

Authors:  Hans Van der Weken; Eric Cox; Bert Devriendt
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-22

Review 7.  Attacking the Intruder at the Gate: Prospects of Mucosal Anti SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines.

Authors:  Kacper Karczmarzyk; Małgorzata Kęsik-Brodacka
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2022-01-19

Review 8.  Evidence for a common mucosal immune system in the pig.

Authors:  Heather L Wilson; Milan R Obradovic
Journal:  Mol Immunol       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 4.407

Review 9.  Established and new rotavirus vaccines: a comprehensive review for healthcare professionals.

Authors:  Volker Vetter; Robert C Gardner; Serge Debrus; Bernd Benninghoff; Priya Pereira
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 3.452

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.