Literature DB >> 20106360

When is the Ross operation a good option to treat aortic valve disease?

Tirone E David1, Anna Woo, Susan Armstrong, Manjula Maganti.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We sought to identify suitable patients for the Ross operation.
METHODS: A cohort of 212 patients (mean age, 34 + or - 9 years; 66% men; 82% with congenital aortic valve disease) underwent the Ross operation and was prospectively followed with clinical evaluations and echocardiographic analysis for 3.1 to 18 years (mean, 10.1 + or - 4.2 years). In addition to longitudinal outcomes determined by means of Kaplan-Meier analysis, Cox regression analysis was used to identify predictors of valve failure.
RESULTS: There were 1 operative and 4 late deaths, none of which were valve related. Survival at 15 years was 96.6% + or - 1.5% and similar to that seen in the general population matched for age and sex. There were 20 reoperations: 13 in the pulmonary autograft, 3 in the pulmonary homograft, and 4 others. Freedom from reoperation in the pulmonary autograft at 15 years was 92.1% + or - 2.3%. Aortic insufficiency was the only independent predictor of reoperation. Freedom from moderate or severe aortic insufficiency at 15 years was 89.7%, and greater than mild aortic insufficiency was 63.2%. Male sex, aortic/pulmonary annular mismatch, aortic annulus of 27 mm or larger, and preoperative aortic insufficiency were associated with higher risk of late aortic insufficiency by means of log-rank analysis. Cox regression analysis identified male sex as the only independent predictor of postoperative aortic insufficiency. Freedom from moderate or severe pulmonary insufficiency, peak gradient of 40 mm Hg or greater, or both at 15 years was 70.8% + or - 6.8%, and event-free survival was 81% + or - 3.7%.
CONCLUSIONS: The Ross operation provided suboptimal results in male patients with aortic insufficiency. The best outcomes were in female patients, those with aortic stenosis, and those with an aortic annulus of less than 27 mm in diameter. Copyright 2010 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20106360     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.09.053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  16 in total

1.  Management of patients with bicuspid aortic valve disease.

Authors:  Todd L Kiefer; Andrew Wang; G Chad Hughes; Thomas M Bashore
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2011-12

Review 2.  Is aortic valve repair or replacement with a bioprosthetic valve the best option for a patient with severe aortic regurgitation?

Authors:  Christos Tourmousoglou; Spiros Lalos; Dimitrios Dougenis
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-11-07

3.  Aortic valve replacement in young and middle-aged adults: looking beyond the tree that hides the forest.

Authors:  Amine Mazine; Maral Ouzounian
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-02

4.  Ross Procedure vs Mechanical Aortic Valve Replacement in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Amine Mazine; Rodolfo V Rocha; Ismail El-Hamamsy; Maral Ouzounian; Bobby Yanagawa; Deepak L Bhatt; Subodh Verma; Jan O Friedrich
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 14.676

Review 5.  The use of allogenic and autologous tissue to treat aortic valve endocarditis.

Authors:  Francesco Nappi; Sanjeet Singh Avtaar Singh; Mario Lusini; Antonio Nenna; Ivancarmine Gambardella; Massimo Chello
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-09

6.  Ex vivo biomechanical analysis of the Ross procedure using the modified inclusion technique in a 3-dimensionally printed left heart simulator.

Authors:  Yuanjia Zhu; Mateo Marin-Cuartas; Matthew H Park; Annabel M Imbrie-Moore; Robert J Wilkerson; Sarah Madira; Danielle M Mullis; Y Joseph Woo
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2021-09-16       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 7.  Surgical treatment of aortic valve disease.

Authors:  Tirone E David
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 8.  Calcific aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Brian R Lindman; Marie-Annick Clavel; Patrick Mathieu; Bernard Iung; Patrizio Lancellotti; Catherine M Otto; Philippe Pibarot
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 52.329

9.  Bicuspid aortic valve disease and ascending aortic aneurysms: gaps in knowledge.

Authors:  Katie L Losenno; Robert L Goodman; Michael W A Chu
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 1.866

10.  Inclusion cylinder method for aortic valve replacement utilising the Ross operation in adults with predominant aortic stenosis - 99% freedom from re-operation on the aortic valve at 15 years.

Authors:  Peter D Skillington; M Mostafa Mokhles; William Wilson; Leeanne Grigg; Marco Larobina; Michael O'Keefe; Johanna Takkenberg
Journal:  Glob Cardiol Sci Pract       Date:  2013-12-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.