Literature DB >> 20105674

Stress distribution in molars restored with inlays or onlays with or without endodontic treatment: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.

W Jiang1, H Bo, G Yongchun, Ni LongXing.   

Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Previous research into the strength of endodontically treated or vital teeth restored with inlays or onlays has not determined which restoration method and material provide the most favorable stress distribution upon loading.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to calculate the von Mises stresses in a mandibular first molar using a 3-dimensional (3-D) finite element model. Models compared endodontically treated and vital teeth, a variety of restorative materials, and the use of either inlays or onlays to restore teeth.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Four 3-D models of mandibular first molars were created: (1) the IV group (inlay restored, vital pulp); (2) the OV group (onlay restored, vital pulp); (3) the IE group (inlay restored, endodontically treated); and (4) the OE group (onlay restored, endodontically treated). In each group, 3 types of restorative material were tested: (1) composite resin, (2) ceramic, and (3) gold alloy. The materials had elastic moduli of 19 GPa, 65 GPa, and 96.6 GPa, respectively. Each model was subjected to a force of 45 N directed to the occlusal surface, applied either vertically or laterally (45 degrees obliquely). The stresses occurring in dentin tissue were calculated. The stress distribution patterns and the maximum von Mises stresses were calculated and compared.
RESULTS: The different restorative materials exhibited similar stress distribution patterns under identical loading conditions. In each group, the gold-restored tooth exhibited the highest von Mises stress, followed by ceramic and composite resin. The maximum von Mises stress in dentin was found in the IE group (16.73 MPa), which was 5 times higher than the highest value found in the OV group (2.96 MPa). The highest stresses, which occurred at the floor of the preparation and the cervical region in dentin, were in the IE group. The stress concentration area in the IE group was also larger.
CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that endodontic treatment caused higher stress concentration in dentin compared with vital teeth, but that proper restoration can minimize internal stresses. In the models, the von Mises stress values increased with the increasing elastic modulus of the restorative material. Composite resin onlays showed the best performance overall in minimizing internal stresses. As internal stresses are indicated as a prime failure mechanism of the restoration, composite resin onlays are expected to better restore structural integrity. Copyright 2010 The Editorial Council of the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20105674     DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60206-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN: 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  22 in total

1.  Restorative material and loading type influence on the biomechanical behavior of wedge shaped cervical lesions.

Authors:  Fabrícia Araújo Pereira; Livia Fávaro Zeola; Giovana de Almeida Milito; Bruno Rodrigues Reis; Rodrigo Dantas Pereira; Paulo Vinícius Soares
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-07-11       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Using occlusal wear information and finite element analysis to investigate stress distributions in human molars.

Authors:  Stefano Benazzi; Ottmar Kullmer; Ian R Grosse; Gerhard W Weber
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  Comparison of occlusal loading conditions in a lower second premolar using three-dimensional finite element analysis.

Authors:  Stefano Benazzi; Ian R Grosse; Giorgio Gruppioni; Gerhard W Weber; Ottmar Kullmer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-03-16       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Polymer-infiltrated ceramic CAD/CAM inlays and partial coverage restorations: 3-year results of a prospective clinical study over 5 years.

Authors:  F A Spitznagel; K J Scholz; J R Strub; K Vach; P C Gierthmuehlen
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  The Effect of Cavity Design on Fracture Resistance and Failure Pattern in Monolithic Zirconia Partial Coverage Restorations - An In vitro Study.

Authors:  Madhavareddy Sri Harsha; Mynampati Praffulla; Mandava Ramesh Babu; Gudugunta Leneena; Tejavath Sai Krishna; G Divya
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-05-01

6.  Load-bearing properties of minimal-invasive monolithic lithium disilicate and zirconia occlusal onlays: finite element and theoretical analyses.

Authors:  Li Ma; Petra C Guess; Yu Zhang
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 5.304

7.  Influence of proximal box elevation on the marginal quality and fracture behavior of root-filled molars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic or composite onlays.

Authors:  Irina Ilgenstein; Nicola U Zitzmann; Julia Bühler; Florian J Wegehaupt; Thomas Attin; Roland Weiger; Gabriel Krastl
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  Influence of cavity design preparation on stress values in maxillary premolar: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Ivana Kantardzić; Darko Vasiljević; Larisa Blazić; Ognjan Luzanin
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.351

9.  Influence of the volume of restorative material on the concentration of stresses in the restorative interface.

Authors:  Marina Pace; Josué-Junior Pierote; João-Victor Câmara; Isabel Barbosa; Cíntia-Tereza Araújo; Lucia Prieto; Guereth-Alexsanderson Carvalho; Gisele Pereira; Renato Vianna; Hana Fried; Justine Tinoco; Amara Santos; Luis-Alexandre Paulillo
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2021-06-01

10.  The evolutionary paradox of tooth wear: simply destruction or inevitable adaptation?

Authors:  Stefano Benazzi; Huynh Nhu Nguyen; Dieter Schulz; Ian R Grosse; Giorgio Gruppioni; Jean-Jacques Hublin; Ottmar Kullmer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.