Literature DB >> 26159778

Restorative material and loading type influence on the biomechanical behavior of wedge shaped cervical lesions.

Fabrícia Araújo Pereira1, Livia Fávaro Zeola1, Giovana de Almeida Milito1, Bruno Rodrigues Reis1, Rodrigo Dantas Pereira2, Paulo Vinícius Soares3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the influence of restorative materials used on the rehabilitation of MOD cavities and loading type, on biomechanical behavior of wedge-shaped (WS) lesions in endodontically treated maxillary premolars. The investigation was conducted by 3D finite element analysis (FEA) and strain gauge test.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six models were generated, with MOD cavities and endodontic treatment: A (MOD amalgam restoration), R (MOD composite restoration), AL (A + cervical lesion (L)), RL, ALR (A + cervical lesion restored with composite (LR)), and RLR. Each model underwent two compressive loading (100N): axial and oblique-45° angle to the long axis on the buccal cusp. The models were analyzed by von Mises criteria. For strain gauge test, 14 standardized maxillary premolars were treated according to the groups described for FEA. Two strain gauges were bonded on each sample submitted to compressive loading in a mechanical testing machine.
RESULTS: A presented higher stress concentration and strain values than R. Oblique loading promoted highest stress concentration and strain rates for all groups. ALR and RLR presented similar stress-strain distribution pattern when compared to A and R.
CONCLUSION: The interaction between MOD cavity restored with amalgam and oblique loading propitiated the highest stress concentration and strain values on cervical region and WS lesion. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The MOD cavity restored with composite resin is a better option than amalgam to improve the biomechanical behavior of wedge-shaped lesion, avoiding dental failure. In addition, the occlusal interferences must be removed, allowing homogeneous contact distribution and preventing WS lesion progression.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Amalgam; Composite resin; Finite element analysis; Noncarious cervical lesion; Strain gauge test; Wedge-shaped lesion

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26159778     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-015-1523-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  46 in total

1.  Examining the prevalence and characteristics of abfractionlike cervical lesions in a population of U.S. veterans.

Authors:  B T Piotrowski; W B Gillette; E B Hancock
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.634

2.  The effect of variation in occlusal loading on the development of abfraction lesions: a finite element study.

Authors:  J S Rees
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.837

Review 3.  A critical review of non-carious cervical (wear) lesions and the role of abfraction, erosion, and abrasion.

Authors:  D W Bartlett; P Shah
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 6.116

4.  Efficient 3D finite element analysis of dental restorative procedures using micro-CT data.

Authors:  Pascal Magne
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2006-05-26       Impact factor: 5.304

5.  Effects of cyclic fatigue stress-biocorrosion on noncarious cervical lesions.

Authors:  John O Grippo; Yada Chaiyabutr; John C Kois
Journal:  J Esthet Restor Dent       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 2.843

6.  Abfractions and attachment loss in teeth with premature contacts in centric relation: clinical observations.

Authors:  Elio Reyes; Charles Hildebolt; Eric Langenwalter; Douglas Miley
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 6.993

7.  Fracture resistance of cuspal coverage of endodontically treated maxillary premolars with combined composite-amalgam compared to other techniques.

Authors:  F Shafiei; M Memarpour; F Karimi
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 2.440

8.  Clinical evaluation of the association of noncarious cervical lesions, parafunctional habits, and TMD diagnosis.

Authors:  Daniela Atili Brandini; Denise Pedrini; Sônia Regina Panzarini; Igor Mariotto Benete; Carolina Lunardelli Trevisan
Journal:  Quintessence Int       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.677

9.  Epidemiological evaluation of the multifactorial aetiology of abfractions.

Authors:  O Bernhardt; D Gesch; C Schwahn; F Mack; G Meyer; U John; T Kocher
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.837

10.  Comparison of two all-in-one adhesives bonded to non-carious cervical lesions--results at 3 years.

Authors:  Michael F Burrow; Martin J Tyas
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-07-26       Impact factor: 3.573

View more
  1 in total

1.  Comparison of the Survival Rate Against Fracture of Endodontically Treated Premolars with Exposed Cervical Lesions Restored with Crowns and Resin Composites: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Kantaporn Kaewchomphoo; Danuchit Banomyong; Yaowaluk Ngoenwiwatkul; Piyapanna Pumpaluk
Journal:  Eur Endod J       Date:  2022-03
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.