Literature DB >> 20105196

Histomorphologic and histomorphometric evaluation of various endosseous implant healing chamber configurations at early implantation times: a study in dogs.

Charles Marin1, Rodrigo Granato, Marcelo Suzuki, Jose N Gil, Malvin N Janal, Paulo G Coelho.   

Abstract

AIM: The objective of this study was to evaluate the early healing of endosseous implants presenting various healing chamber configurations in a beagle dog mandible model.
METHODS: The four premolars of 12 beagle dogs were extracted and allowed to heal for a period of 8 weeks. Implants allowing six different healing chamber configurations were placed in each dog (three per side, six configurations per dog). The animals were sacrificed after 3 and 5 weeks in vivo (n=6 per time in vivo), and the implants were non-decalcified processed to slides of approximately 30 microm thickness. Bone-to-implant contact (BIC) and bone area fraction occupied (BAFO) within the healing chamber were quantified. Statistical analysis was performed by a GLM ANOVA model at 5% significance level.
RESULTS: Osseointegration and healing with woven bone filling throughout all healing chambers was observed. Replacement of woven bone by lamellar bone showing primary osteonic structures was observed at 5 weeks. BIC was significantly affected by healing chamber configuration (P<0.001) and was not affected by time in vivo (P>0.42) at 3 and 5 weeks in vivo. BAFO was not affected by healing chamber configuration (P>0.14) however significantly increased over implantation time (P<0.001).
CONCLUSION: Regardless of healing chamber design and dimensions considered, healing allowed the devices osseointegration. However, healing chamber configuration significantly affected osseointegration measurable parameters such as BIC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20105196     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01853.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  17 in total

1.  Regeneration of a Pediatric Alveolar Cleft Model Using Three-Dimensionally Printed Bioceramic Scaffolds and Osteogenic Agents: Comparison of Dipyridamole and rhBMP-2.

Authors:  Christopher D Lopez; Paulo G Coelho; Lukasz Witek; Andrea Torroni; Michael I Greenberg; Dean L Cuadrado; Audrey M Guarino; Jonathan M Bekisz; Bruce N Cronstein; Roberto L Flores
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Three dimensionally printed bioactive ceramic scaffold osseoconduction across critical-sized mandibular defects.

Authors:  Christopher D Lopez; J Rodrigo Diaz-Siso; Lukasz Witek; Jonathan M Bekisz; Bruce N Cronstein; Andrea Torroni; Roberto L Flores; Eduardo D Rodriguez; Paulo G Coelho
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 2.192

3.  Dipyridamole Augments Three-Dimensionally Printed Bioactive Ceramic Scaffolds to Regenerate Craniofacial Bone.

Authors:  Christopher D Lopez; J Rodrigo Diaz-Siso; Lukasz Witek; Jonathan M Bekisz; Luiz F Gil; Bruce N Cronstein; Roberto L Flores; Andrea Torroni; Eduardo D Rodriguez; Paulo G Coelho
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  Drilling dimension effects in early stages of osseointegration and implant stability in a canine model.

Authors:  Felipe-Eduardo Baires-Campos; Ryo Jimbo; Estevam-Augusto Bonfante; Maiolino-Thomaz Fonseca-Oliveira; Camila Moura; Darceny Zanetta-Barbosa; Paulo-Guilherme Coelho
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2015-07-01

Review 5.  Impact of Dental Implant Surface Modifications on Osseointegration.

Authors:  Ralf Smeets; Bernd Stadlinger; Frank Schwarz; Benedicta Beck-Broichsitter; Ole Jung; Clarissa Precht; Frank Kloss; Alexander Gröbe; Max Heiland; Tobias Ebker
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Numerical Method for the Design of Healing Chamber in Additive-Manufactured Dental Implants.

Authors:  Hsiao-Chien Lee; Pei-I Tsai; Chih-Chieh Huang; San-Yuan Chen; Chuen-Guang Chao; Nien-Ti Tsou
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-02-12       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Monitoring the Changes of Material Properties at Bone-Implant Interface during the Healing Process In Vivo: A Viscoelastic Investigation.

Authors:  Hsiang-Ho Chen; Wei-Yi Lai; Tze-Jian Chee; Ya-Hui Chan; Sheng-Wei Feng
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Can changes in implant macrogeometry accelerate the osseointegration process?: An in vivo experimental biomechanical and histological evaluations.

Authors:  Sergio Alexandre Gehrke; Jaime Aramburú; Leticia Pérez-Díaz; Tales Dias do Prado; Berenice Anina Dedavid; Patricia Mazon; Piedad N De Aza
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Osseodensification enables bone healing chambers with improved low-density bone site primary stability: an in vivo study.

Authors:  Rafael Coutinho Mello-Machado; Suelen Cristina Sartoretto; Jose Mauro Granjeiro; José de Albuquerque Calasans-Maia; Marcelo Jose Pinheiro Guedes de Uzeda; Carlos Fernando de Almeida Barros Mourão; Bruna Ghiraldini; Fabio Jose Barbosa Bezerra; Plinio Mendes Senna; Mônica Diuana Calasans-Maia
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Physicochemical Characterization and In Vivo Evaluation of Amorphous and Partially Crystalline Calcium Phosphate Coatings Fabricated on Ti-6Al-4V Implants by the Plasma Spray Method.

Authors:  Estevam A Bonfante; Lukasz Witek; Nick Tovar; Marcelo Suzuki; Charles Marin; Rodrigo Granato; Paulo G Coelho
Journal:  Int J Biomater       Date:  2012-08-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.