Literature DB >> 20104418

Effect of mobility devices on orientation sensors that contain magnetometers.

Cynthia Kendell1, Edward D Lemaire.   

Abstract

Orientation sensors containing magnetometers use the earth's magnetic field as a reference. Ferromagnetic objects may distort this magnetic field, leading to inaccurate orientation output. We explored the viability of these orientation sensors for motion analysis in an assistive mobility device rehabilitative setting. We attached two MTx orientation sensors (XSens; Enschade, the Netherlands), connected to the XBus Master data collection unit (XSens), to a plastic frame such that the relative angle between sensors was constant. We then moved a series of mobility devices in proximity to the plastic frame: two knee-ankle-foot orthoses (aluminum, stainless steel), one ankle-foot orthosis, two transtibial prostheses (exoskeletal, endoskeletal), two walkers (standard, Challenger Low Wide [Evolution Technologies; Port Coquitlam, Canada]), and two wheelchairs (Tango [OrthoFab; Quebec City, Canada], GTi [Quickie; Phoenix, Arizona]). For each mobility device, we calculated the average difference in relative angle between the baseline and peak angles for each of five trials. Errors ranged from less than 0.10 to 35.29 degrees, depending on the mobility device and frame positioning near the device. This demonstrated the large errors that can occur when magnetometer-based orientation sensors with mobility devices are used. While strategic orientation sensor placement on some mobility devices can minimize these errors to an acceptable level, testing protocols should be implemented to verify orientation sensor accuracy for these applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20104418     DOI: 10.1682/jrrd.2008.09.0132

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev        ISSN: 0748-7711


  4 in total

1.  An Inertial Measurement Unit-Based Wireless System for Shoulder Motion Assessment in Patients with Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: A Validation Pilot Study in a Clinical Setting.

Authors:  Riccardo Bravi; Stefano Caputo; Sara Jayousi; Alessio Martinelli; Lorenzo Biotti; Ilaria Nannini; Erez James Cohen; Eros Quarta; Stefano Grasso; Giacomo Lucchesi; Gabriele Righi; Giulio Del Popolo; Lorenzo Mucchi; Diego Minciacchi
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 2.  The use of wearable inertial motion sensors in human lower limb biomechanics studies: a systematic review.

Authors:  Daniel Tik-Pui Fong; Yue-Yan Chan
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 3.576

3.  Autonomous Quality Control of Joint Orientation Measured with Inertial Sensors.

Authors:  Karina Lebel; Patrick Boissy; Hung Nguyen; Christian Duval
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 3.576

4.  Elbow spasticity during passive stretch-reflex: clinical evaluation using a wearable sensor system.

Authors:  Chris A McGibbon; Andrew Sexton; Melony Jones; Colleen O'Connell
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 4.262

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.