Literature DB >> 20104378

Bilateral parietal cortex damage does not impair associative memory for paired stimuli.

Marian E Berryhill1, David B Drowos, Ingrid R Olson.   

Abstract

Recent neuroimaging and neuropsychological findings indicate that the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) plays an important, albeit undefined, role in episodic memory. Here we ask whether this region is specifically involved in associative aspects of episodic memory. Experiment 1 tested whether PPC damage affects the ability to learn and retrieve novel word pair associations. Experiment 2 tested whether PPC damage affects the retrieval of object-location associations, in a spatial fan task. In both experiments, patients showed normal levels of associative memory. These findings demonstrated that PPC damage did not prevent association memory for verbal items. Finally Experiment 3 tested whether PPC damage affects memory for nonverbal audio-visual pairs. The patients performed with normal accuracy, but with significantly reduced confidence. These findings indicate that the PPC does not have a central role in association formation per se and, instead, indicate that the PPC is involved in other aspects of episodic memory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20104378      PMCID: PMC2943560          DOI: 10.1080/02643290903534150

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol        ISSN: 0264-3294            Impact factor:   2.468


  36 in total

Review 1.  Hippocampal system and declarative (relational) memory: summarizing the data from functional neuroimaging studies.

Authors:  N J Cohen; J Ryan; C Hunt; L Romine; T Wszalek; C Nash
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.899

2.  Situation models, propositions, and the fan effect.

Authors:  Gabriel A Radvansky
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-06

3.  Simultanagnosia: when a rose is not red.

Authors:  H Branch Coslett; Grace Lie
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Feature binding, attention and object perception.

Authors:  A Treisman
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1998-08-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  The binding problem.

Authors:  A Treisman
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 6.627

6.  Focal retrograde amnesia following closed head injury: a case study and theoretical account.

Authors:  N M Hunkin; A J Parkin; V A Bradley; E H Burrows; F K Aldrich; A Jansari; C Burdon-Cooper
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Revisiting Snodgrass and Vanderwart's object pictorial set: the role of surface detail in basic-level object recognition.

Authors:  Bruno Rossion; Gilles Pourtois
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.490

8.  Competition and representation during memory retrieval: roles of the prefrontal cortex and the posterior parietal cortex.

Authors:  Myeong-Ho Sohn; Adam Goode; V Andrew Stenger; Cameron S Carter; John R Anderson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-05-28       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Some surprising findings on the involvement of the parietal lobe in human memory.

Authors:  Ingrid R Olson; Marian Berryhill
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 2.877

Review 10.  Role of parietal regions in episodic memory retrieval: the dual attentional processes hypothesis.

Authors:  Roberto Cabeza
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 3.139

View more
  15 in total

1.  A Role for the Left Angular Gyrus in Episodic Simulation and Memory.

Authors:  Preston P Thakral; Kevin P Madore; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Impaired perception of mnemonic oldness, but not mnemonic newness, after parietal lobe damage.

Authors:  Kylie H Hower; John Wixted; Marian E Berryhill; Ingrid R Olson
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-02-22       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Brain mechanisms of successful recognition through retrieval of semantic context.

Authors:  Kristin E Flegal; Alejandro Marín-Gutiérrez; J Daniel Ragland; Charan Ranganath
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 4.  Distinct Neural Networks Support Autobiographical and Episodic Remembering.

Authors:  Siddharth Ramanan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  At the intersection of attention and memory: the mechanistic role of the posterior parietal lobe in working memory.

Authors:  Marian E Berryhill; Jason Chein; Ingrid R Olson
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-02-21       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Experience-near but not experience-far autobiographical facts depend on the medial temporal lobe for retrieval: Evidence from amnesia.

Authors:  Matthew D Grilli; Mieke Verfaellie
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the left angular gyrus during encoding does not impair associative memory performance.

Authors:  Joshua D Koen; Preston P Thakral; Michael D Rugg
Journal:  Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 3.065

8.  Functional heterogeneity in posterior parietal cortex across attention and episodic memory retrieval.

Authors:  J Benjamin Hutchinson; Melina R Uncapher; Kevin S Weiner; David W Bressler; Michael A Silver; Alison R Preston; Anthony D Wagner
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  Similarities and differences between parietal and frontal patients in autobiographical and constructed experience tasks.

Authors:  Marian E Berryhill; Lauren Picasso; Robert Arnold; David Drowos; Ingrid R Olson
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Divided attention at retrieval does not influence neural correlates of recollection in young or older adults.

Authors:  Mingzhu Hou; Erin D Horne; Marianne de Chastelaine; Michael D Rugg
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.