Literature DB >> 20103792

Sonographic prediction of fetal macrosomia: the consequences of false diagnosis.

Nir Melamed1, Yariv Yogev, Israel Meizner, Reuven Mashiach, Avi Ben-Haroush.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of false diagnosis of macrosomia (<4500 g) on maternal/perinatal outcomes.
METHODS: We conducted a case-control study of women (n = 1938) in whom sonographically estimated fetal weight (EFW) was determined up to 3 days before delivery and actual birth weight (BW) was 3500 to 4499 g. Women with false-positive and -negative findings for macrosomia were compared, respectively, with women with true-negative and -positive findings for outcome variables.
RESULTS: The cesarean delivery (CD) rate was 2 to 2.5 times higher when EFW was 4000 to 4499 g, regardless of actual BW. Failure to detect macrosomia was associated with higher rates of perineal trauma, 5-minute Apgar scores less than 7, and neonatal trauma, mostly related to the higher rate of surgical vaginal deliveries. The use of another sonographic model with a lower false-positive rate could theoretically reduce the CD rate by approximately 5%.
CONCLUSIONS: False diagnosis of macrosomia substantially increases the CD rate and leads to maternal/neonatal complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20103792     DOI: 10.7863/jum.2010.29.2.225

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ultrasound Med        ISSN: 0278-4297            Impact factor:   2.153


  15 in total

Review 1.  Sonographic evaluation and the pregnancy complicated by diabetes.

Authors:  Jennifer M McNamara; Anthony O Odibo
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.810

2.  Predicting large fetuses at birth: do multiple ultrasound examinations and longitudinal statistical modelling improve prediction?

Authors:  Jun Zhang; Sungduk Kim; Jagteshwar Grewal; Paul S Albert
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 3.980

Review 3.  Timing of delivery in women with diabetes in pregnancy.

Authors:  Howard Berger; Nir Melamed
Journal:  Obstet Med       Date:  2014-01-15

4.  Identifying Fetal Growth Disorders Using Ultrasonography in Women With Diabetes.

Authors:  Annie M Dude; Lynn M Yee
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 2.153

5.  Association between Sonographic Estimated Fetal Weight and the Risk of Cesarean Delivery among Nulliparous Women with Diabetes in Pregnancy.

Authors:  Annie M Dude; William A Grobman; Lynn M Yee
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  Labor and Delivery Experiences of Mothers with Suspected Large Babies.

Authors:  Erika R Cheng; Eugene R Declercq; Candice Belanoff; Naomi E Stotland; Ronald E Iverson
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2015-12

7.  Maternal and neonatal outcomes of macrosomic pregnancies.

Authors:  Alina Weissmann-Brenner; Michal J Simchen; Eran Zilberberg; Anat Kalter; Boaz Weisz; Reuven Achiron; Mordechai Dulitzky
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2012-09

8.  Accuracy of immediate antepartum ultrasound estimated fetal weight and its impact on mode of delivery and outcome - a cohort analysis.

Authors:  Johannes Stubert; Adam Peschel; Michael Bolz; Änne Glass; Bernd Gerber
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Disadvantages of a weight estimation formula for macrosomic fetuses: the Hart formula from a clinical perspective.

Authors:  Christoph Weiss; Peter Oppelt; Richard Bernhard Mayer
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 2.344

Review 10.  Biomarkers for Macrosomia Prediction in Pregnancies Affected by Diabetes.

Authors:  Sofia Nahavandi; Jas-Mine Seah; Alexis Shub; Christine Houlihan; Elif I Ekinci
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 5.555

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.