INTRODUCTION: Left ventricular assist devices have been successfully used as a bridge to cardiac transplantation. Because many patients exhibit marked clinical improvement of their heart failure after LVAD implantation, we studied the physiological effect of pulsatile and non-pulsatile devices on the neurohormonal axis and exercise capacity. METHODS: We prospectively included 20 patients (17 men, 3 women) undergoing LVAD implantation between November 2001 and January 2004. Ten patients (1 woman and 9 men) were treated with the non-pulsatile INCOR-LVAD (Berlin Heart(c)) and ten patients received the pulsatile EXCOR LVAD (Berlin Heart(c)). Blood samples for plasma renin activity (PRA) were taken once a week over a period of ten weeks. All blood samples were collected in the morning before mobilization. Blood pressure, body weight, fluid intake and urine production were measured once a day. All patients received standard hospital diet with no limitation in fluid intake. RESULTS: Body weight remained constant in both groups throughout the ten weeks' examination, and fluid intake and urine production were balanced in all patients. Although there was no significant difference in mean blood pressure (INCOR: 70 +/- 10 mmHg; EXCOR: 73 +/- 10 mmHg), plasma renin activity was substantially elevated in patients with non-pulsatile left ventricular support (INCOR: 94.68 +/- 33.97 microU/ml; EXCOR: 17.06 +/- 15.94 microU/ml; P < 0.05). Furthermore plasma aldosterone levels were significantly higher in patients supported by non-pulsatile INCOR LVAD (INCOR: 73.4 +/- 9.6 microg/ml; EXCOR: 20.6 +/- 4.6 microg/ml; P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that pulsatile as well as non-pulsatile left ventricular assist devices are equally able to treat chronic heart failure. However pulsatile devices seem to have a greater impact on reversing the changes in plasma renin activity and might thus offer a greater advantage when recovery of left ventricular function is expected. (c) Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart-New York.
INTRODUCTION: Left ventricular assist devices have been successfully used as a bridge to cardiac transplantation. Because many patients exhibit marked clinical improvement of their heart failure after LVAD implantation, we studied the physiological effect of pulsatile and non-pulsatile devices on the neurohormonal axis and exercise capacity. METHODS: We prospectively included 20 patients (17 men, 3 women) undergoing LVAD implantation between November 2001 and January 2004. Ten patients (1 woman and 9 men) were treated with the non-pulsatile INCOR-LVAD (Berlin Heart(c)) and ten patients received the pulsatile EXCOR LVAD (Berlin Heart(c)). Blood samples for plasma renin activity (PRA) were taken once a week over a period of ten weeks. All blood samples were collected in the morning before mobilization. Blood pressure, body weight, fluid intake and urine production were measured once a day. All patients received standard hospital diet with no limitation in fluid intake. RESULTS: Body weight remained constant in both groups throughout the ten weeks' examination, and fluid intake and urine production were balanced in all patients. Although there was no significant difference in mean blood pressure (INCOR: 70 +/- 10 mmHg; EXCOR: 73 +/- 10 mmHg), plasma renin activity was substantially elevated in patients with non-pulsatile left ventricular support (INCOR: 94.68 +/- 33.97 microU/ml; EXCOR: 17.06 +/- 15.94 microU/ml; P < 0.05). Furthermore plasma aldosterone levels were significantly higher in patients supported by non-pulsatile INCOR LVAD (INCOR: 73.4 +/- 9.6 microg/ml; EXCOR: 20.6 +/- 4.6 microg/ml; P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that pulsatile as well as non-pulsatile left ventricular assist devices are equally able to treat chronic heart failure. However pulsatile devices seem to have a greater impact on reversing the changes in plasma renin activity and might thus offer a greater advantage when recovery of left ventricular function is expected. (c) Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart-New York.
Authors: Stavros G Drakos; Abdallah G Kfoury; Josef Stehlik; Craig H Selzman; Bruce B Reid; John V Terrovitis; John N Nanas; Dean Y Li Journal: Circulation Date: 2012-07-10 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Melissa A H Witman; Ryan S Garten; Jayson R Gifford; H Jonathan Groot; Joel D Trinity; Josef Stehlik; Jose N Nativi; Craig H Selzman; Stavros G Drakos; Russell S Richardson Journal: JACC Heart Fail Date: 2015-08-12 Impact factor: 12.035
Authors: Samuel T Coffin; Dia R Waguespack; Nicholas A Haglund; Simon Maltais; Jamie P Dwyer; Mary E Keebler Journal: Cardiorenal Med Date: 2015-01-09 Impact factor: 2.041
Authors: Stavros G Drakos; Abdallah G Kfoury; Craig H Selzman; Divya Ratan Verma; John N Nanas; Dean Y Li; Josef Stehlik Journal: Curr Opin Cardiol Date: 2011-05 Impact factor: 2.161
Authors: Chiu-Yu Chen; Maria E Montez-Rath; Lindsay J May; Katsuhide Maeda; Seth A Hollander; David N Rosenthal; Catherine D Krawczeski; Scott M Sutherland Journal: ASAIO J Date: 2021-12-01 Impact factor: 2.872
Authors: Meredith A Brisco; Stephen E Kimmel; Steven G Coca; Mary E Putt; Mariell Jessup; Wilson W H Tang; Chirag R Parikh; Jeffrey M Testani Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2013-11-08 Impact factor: 8.790