Literature DB >> 20100970

Analysis of ventricular activation using surface electrocardiography to predict left ventricular reverse volumetric remodeling during cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Michael O Sweeney1, Rutger J van Bommel, Martin J Schalij, C Jan Willem Borleffs, Anne S Hellkamp, Jeroen J Bax.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy for heart failure with left bundle branch block reduces left ventricular (LV) conduction delay, contraction asynchrony, and LV end-systolic volume ("reverse remodeling"). Up to one third of patients do not improve, and the electric requirements for reverse remodeling are unclear. We hypothesized that reverse remodeling is predicted by the left bundle branch block ventricular activation sequence, the paced activation sequence, and interactions between these 2 conditions. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Twelve-lead ECGs during left bundle branch block and cardiac resynchronization therapy were analyzed in 202 consecutive patients (New York Heart Association class III to IV heart failure, ejection fraction < or =35%) for predictors of reverse remodeling (> or =10% reduction in end-systolic volume) at 6 months. Greater longest baseline LV activation time predicted increased odds of reverse remodeling (odds ratio [confidence interval]=1.30 [1.11, 1.52] per 10-ms increase), whereas higher QRS scores for LV scar predicted reduced reverse remodeling (odds ratio [confidence interval]=0.49 [0.27, 0.88] for each 1-point increase from 0 to 4; 0.92 [0.83, 1.01] for each 1-point increase >4). After cardiac resynchronization therapy, increasing R amplitudes in leads V(1) through V(2) (odds ratio [confidence interval]=2.76 [1.01, 7.51] for each 1x increase over [baseline Rx4.5]) and left-->right frontal axis shift (odds ratio [confidence interval]=2.00 [0.99, 4.02]), indicators of ventricular activation wavefront fusion, were positive predictors of reverse remodeling. Predicted probability of reverse remodeling ranged from <20% for patients with adverse predictors to 99% for those with positive predictors.
CONCLUSIONS: Ventricular activation with the use of the ECG accurately predicts LV reverse remodeling during cardiac resynchronization therapy. Greater longest baseline LV activation time and smaller scar volume combined with wavefront fusion on the paced ECG, anticipate higher probability of reverse remodeling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20100970     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.894774

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  39 in total

Review 1.  The year of 2010 in electrocardiology.

Authors:  Shlomo Stern
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.468

2.  Effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients without left intraventricular dyssynchrony.

Authors:  Dominique Auger; Gabe B Bleeker; Matteo Bertini; See H Ewe; Rutger J van Bommel; Tomasz G Witkowski; Arnold C T Ng; Lieselot van Erven; Martin J Schalij; Jeroen J Bax; Victoria Delgado
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 29.983

3.  Myocardial scar in sarcoidosis by 12-lead ECG and pathology.

Authors:  David G Strauss; Ronald H Selvester; Louis R Dibernardo
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.468

4.  Notched QRS complex in lateral leads as a novel predictor of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Wenzhi Pan; Yangang Su; Wenqin Zhu; Xianhong Shu; Junbo Ge
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 5.  Transcatheter aortic valve implantation-induced left bundle branch block: causes and consequences.

Authors:  Thomas T Poels; Patrick Houthuizen; Leen A F M Van Garsse; Jos G Maessen; Peter de Jaegere; Frits W Prinzen
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 4.132

6.  Non-invasively quantified changes in left ventricular activation predict outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Daniel J Friedman; Kasper Emerek; Steen Møller Hansen; Christoffer Polcwiartek; Peter L Sørensen; Zak Loring; Joanne Sutter; Peter Søgaard; Joseph Kisslo; Claus Graff; Brett D Atwater
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2019-10-08

7.  Left ventricular performance during triggered left ventricular pacing in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy and left bundle branch block.

Authors:  Christoffer Tobias Witt; Mads Brix Kronborg; Ellen Aagaard Nohr; Jens Cosedis Nielsen
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 8.  Clinical implications of conduction abnormalities and arrhythmias after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Robert M A van der Boon; Patrick Houthuizen; Rutger-Jan Nuis; Nicolas M van Mieghem; Frits Prinzen; Peter P T de Jaegere
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.931

9.  Lead one ratio in left bundle branch block predicts poor cardiac resynchronization therapy response.

Authors:  Zak Loring; Daniel J Friedman; Kasper Emerek; Claus Graff; Peter L Sørensen; Steen M Hansen; Bjorn Wieslander; Martin Ugander; Peter Søgaard; Brett D Atwater
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 1.976

10.  Changes in the optimal cardiac resynchronization therapy pacing configuration during physiologic stress.

Authors:  Brett D Atwater; W Schuyler Jones; Zak Loring; Daniel J Friedman
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 1.438

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.