OBJECTIVE: To test the moderating role of the extent of fast-food restaurants in one's immediate environment in the association between mastery and metabolic risk. Higher sense of mastery (perceived control over one's circumstances) has been associated with better metabolic outcomes. Mastery may be instrumental in resisting unhealthful environmental food cues when these become ubiquitous, resulting in a greater health impact of mastery. METHODS: Blood samples were obtained from 344 individuals (50% men), aged 18 to 57 years (mean, 34.9 years), sampled from seven census tracts representing the spectrum of census tract-level socioeconomic status and language (French/English) in Montreal. Risk factors based on standards for high-density lipoprotein and total cholesterol, waist circumference, body mass index, triglycerides, and glycated hemoglobin were summed to obtain a cumulative metabolic risk score. Mastery was self-reported, using a validated scale. The proportion of restaurants classified as fast-food within 500 m of participants' residences was determined, using a geographic information system. Main and interactive effects were tested with Poisson regression, accounting for clustering of observations and participants' age, gender, education, and income. RESULTS: Mastery interacted with fast-food exposure in relation to metabolic risk (p = .03). Higher mastery was significantly associated with lower metabolic risk for participants surrounded by a high proportion of fast food (relative risk, 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.76-0.84; p < .0001), but not for those living in areas with low proportion of fast-food restaurants (relative risk, 0.94; 95% confidence interval, 0.82-1.08; p = .37). CONCLUSIONS: A positive relationship between mastery and lower metabolic risk was most apparent in environments with higher fast-food exposure.
OBJECTIVE: To test the moderating role of the extent of fast-food restaurants in one's immediate environment in the association between mastery and metabolic risk. Higher sense of mastery (perceived control over one's circumstances) has been associated with better metabolic outcomes. Mastery may be instrumental in resisting unhealthful environmental food cues when these become ubiquitous, resulting in a greater health impact of mastery. METHODS: Blood samples were obtained from 344 individuals (50% men), aged 18 to 57 years (mean, 34.9 years), sampled from seven census tracts representing the spectrum of census tract-level socioeconomic status and language (French/English) in Montreal. Risk factors based on standards for high-density lipoprotein and total cholesterol, waist circumference, body mass index, triglycerides, and glycated hemoglobin were summed to obtain a cumulative metabolic risk score. Mastery was self-reported, using a validated scale. The proportion of restaurants classified as fast-food within 500 m of participants' residences was determined, using a geographic information system. Main and interactive effects were tested with Poisson regression, accounting for clustering of observations and participants' age, gender, education, and income. RESULTS: Mastery interacted with fast-food exposure in relation to metabolic risk (p = .03). Higher mastery was significantly associated with lower metabolic risk for participants surrounded by a high proportion of fast food (relative risk, 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.76-0.84; p < .0001), but not for those living in areas with low proportion of fast-food restaurants (relative risk, 0.94; 95% confidence interval, 0.82-1.08; p = .37). CONCLUSIONS: A positive relationship between mastery and lower metabolic risk was most apparent in environments with higher fast-food exposure.
Authors: Brian E Saelens; S Sonia Arteaga; David Berrigan; Rachel M Ballard; Amy A Gorin; Tiffany M Powell-Wiley; Charlotte Pratt; Jill Reedy; Shannon N Zenk Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2018-04 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Roberta Dalle Molle; Hajar Fatemi; Alain Dagher; Robert D Levitan; Patricia P Silveira; Laurette Dubé Journal: Neurosci Biobehav Rev Date: 2016-12-23 Impact factor: 8.989
Authors: Tracey Ledoux; Heather Adamus-Leach; Daniel P O'Connor; Scherezade Mama; Rebecca E Lee Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2014-01-24 Impact factor: 4.022
Authors: Suzanne J Carroll; Catherine Paquet; Natasha J Howard; Neil T Coffee; Robert J Adams; Anne W Taylor; Theo Niyonsenga; Mark Daniel Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2017-02-02 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Joreintje D Mackenbach; Marielle A Beenackers; J Mark Noordzij; Joost Oude Groeniger; Jeroen Lakerveld; Frank J van Lenthe Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-02-25 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Grzegorz Sobek; Edyta Łuszczki; Mariusz Dąbrowski; Katarzyna Dereń; Joanna Baran; Aneta Weres; Artur Mazur Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-01-15 Impact factor: 3.390