Susan K Roepke1, Igor Grant. 1. Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, San Diego State University/University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0680, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: A great deal of research has been devoted to identifying the psychological factors that might be associated with reduced risk for cardiovascular diseases. In particular, coping resources such as personal mastery might attenuate stress-related pathophysiology. The purpose of the present review was to examine the existing literature reporting associations between personal mastery and cardiometabolic health outcomes to determine which outcomes have been studied to date, investigate the extent of inconsistency in the literature, and propose new directions for research. DESIGN: Systematic review of articles examining the associations between personal mastery and cardiometabolic health. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Studies were included if they examined objective measures of cardiometabolic function, cardiovascular events, and/or mortality. RESULTS: Thirty-two studies were identified examining the effect of mastery on the following outcomes: mortality and/or cardiovascular events, psychoneuroendocrine stress systems, cardiovascular reactivity to acute stress, metabolic dysregulation, inflammation/coagulation, and evidence of large vessel disease from imaging methods. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, mastery was associated with better cardiometabolic health and reduced risk for disease and/or death, typically with a small-medium effect size. A relatively small proportion of studies reported contradictory findings that higher mastery was associated with poorer cardiometabolic outcomes. The state of the current research suggests that future investigations should focus on 1) clarifying the mediators and moderators most relevant in the association between mastery and downstream disease, 2) testing the association between mastery and biological outcomes longitudinally, 3) examining the physiological impact of mastery-increasing interventions, and 4) studying the relationship between mastery and disease risk in diverse ethnic or sociocultural groups.
OBJECTIVE: A great deal of research has been devoted to identifying the psychological factors that might be associated with reduced risk for cardiovascular diseases. In particular, coping resources such as personal mastery might attenuate stress-related pathophysiology. The purpose of the present review was to examine the existing literature reporting associations between personal mastery and cardiometabolic health outcomes to determine which outcomes have been studied to date, investigate the extent of inconsistency in the literature, and propose new directions for research. DESIGN: Systematic review of articles examining the associations between personal mastery and cardiometabolic health. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Studies were included if they examined objective measures of cardiometabolic function, cardiovascular events, and/or mortality. RESULTS: Thirty-two studies were identified examining the effect of mastery on the following outcomes: mortality and/or cardiovascular events, psychoneuroendocrine stress systems, cardiovascular reactivity to acute stress, metabolic dysregulation, inflammation/coagulation, and evidence of large vessel disease from imaging methods. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, mastery was associated with better cardiometabolic health and reduced risk for disease and/or death, typically with a small-medium effect size. A relatively small proportion of studies reported contradictory findings that higher mastery was associated with poorer cardiometabolic outcomes. The state of the current research suggests that future investigations should focus on 1) clarifying the mediators and moderators most relevant in the association between mastery and downstream disease, 2) testing the association between mastery and biological outcomes longitudinally, 3) examining the physiological impact of mastery-increasing interventions, and 4) studying the relationship between mastery and disease risk in diverse ethnic or sociocultural groups.
Authors: Amara E Ezeamama; Jennifer Elkins; Cherie Simpson; Shaniqua L Smith; Joseph C Allegra; Toni P Miles Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2015-10-17 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: M Maya McDoom; Priya Palta; Priya Vart; Stephen P Juraschek; Anna Kucharska-Newton; Ana V Diez Roux; Josef Coresh Journal: J Hypertens Date: 2018-06 Impact factor: 4.844
Authors: Timothy J Cunningham; Teresa E Seeman; Ichiro Kawachi; Steven L Gortmaker; David R Jacobs; Catarina I Kiefe; Lisa F Berkman Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2012-05-23 Impact factor: 4.634