Literature DB >> 20100042

Phonological learning and lexicality of treated stimuli.

Judith A Gierut1, Michele L Morrisette.   

Abstract

The purpose was to evaluate the lexicality of treated stimuli relative to phonological learning by preschool children with functional phonological disorders. Four children were paired in a single-subject alternating treatments design that was overlaid on a multiple baseline across subjects design. Within each pair, one child was taught one sound in real words and a second sound in non-words; for the other child of the pair, lexicality was reversed and counterbalanced. The dependent variable was production accuracy of the treated sounds as measured during the session-by-session course of instruction. Results indicated that production accuracy of the treated sound was as good as or better using non-word as opposed to real word stimuli. The clinical implications are considered, along with potential accounts of the patterns of learning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20100042      PMCID: PMC3281491          DOI: 10.3109/02699200903440975

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon        ISSN: 0269-9206            Impact factor:   1.346


  50 in total

1.  Age of acquisition and imageability ratings for a large set of words, including verbs and function words.

Authors:  H Bird; S Franklin; D Howard
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  2001-02

2.  Phonotactics, neighborhood activation, and lexical access for spoken words.

Authors:  M S Vitevitch; P A Luce; D B Pisoni; E T Auer
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1999 Jun 1-15       Impact factor: 2.381

3.  Use of the nonsense-syllable in articulation therapy.

Authors:  G H SHAMES
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1957-06

4.  Sublexical and lexical representations in speech production: effects of phonotactic probability and onset density.

Authors:  Michael S Vitevitch; Jonna Armbruster; Shinying Chu
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Effects of syllable frequency in speech production.

Authors:  Joana Cholin; Willem J M Levelt; Niels O Schiller
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2005-06-06

6.  A web-based interface to calculate phonotactic probability for words and nonwords in English.

Authors:  Michael S Vitevitch; Paul A Luce
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  2004-08

7.  Differentiating phonotactic probability and neighborhood density in adult word learning.

Authors:  Holly L Storkel; Jonna Armbrüster; Tiffany P Hogan
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Some constraints on functionally disordered phonologies: phonetic inventories and phonotactics.

Authors:  D A Dinnsen; S B Chin; M Elbert; T W Powell
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1990-03

9.  Alternating treatments design: one strategy for comparing the effects of two treatments in a single subject.

Authors:  D H Barlow; S C Hayes
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1979

10.  Nonwords and generalization in children with phonological disorders.

Authors:  Judith A Gierut; Michele L Morrisette; Suzanne M Ziemer
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 2.408

View more
  5 in total

1.  Nexus to Lexis: Phonological Disorders in Children.

Authors:  Judith A Gierut
Journal:  Semin Speech Lang       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 1.761

2.  A comparison of word lexicality in the treatment of speech sound disorders.

Authors:  Alycia E Cummings; Jessica A Barlow
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 1.346

3.  Nonwords and generalization in children with phonological disorders.

Authors:  Judith A Gierut; Michele L Morrisette; Suzanne M Ziemer
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 2.408

4.  Speech Intervention Outcomes Associated With Word Lexicality and Intervention Intensity.

Authors:  Alycia Cummings; Janet Hallgrimson; Sarah Robinson
Journal:  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Treatment Targets for Co-Occurring Speech-Language Impairment: A Case Study.

Authors:  Philip N Combiths; Jessica A Barlow; Jennifer Taps Richard; Sonja L Pruitt-Lord
Journal:  Perspect ASHA Spec Interest Groups       Date:  2019-04-03
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.