| Literature DB >> 20098585 |
Hae-Mi Lim1, Ji-Eun Park, Young-Ju Choi, Kap-Bum Huh, Wha-Young Kim.
Abstract
This study was designed to evaluate the effect of individualized diabetes nutrition education. The nutrition education program was open to all type 2 diabetes patients visiting the clinic center and finally 67 patients agreed to join the program. To compare with 67 education group subjects, 34 subjects were selected by medical record review. The education program consisted of one class session for 1-2 hours long in a small group of 4~5 patients. A meal planning using the food exchange system was provided according to the diet prescription and food habits of each subject. Measurements of clinical outcomes and dietary intakes were performed at baseline and 3 months after the education session. After 3 months, subjects in education group showed improvement in dietary behavior and food exchange knowledge. In education group, intakes of protein, calcium, phosphorus, vitamin B(2), and folate per 1,000 kcal/day were significantly increased and cholesterol intake was significantly decreased. They also showed significant reductions in body weight, body mass index (BMI), and fasting blood concentrations of glucose (FBS), HbA1c, total cholesterol, and triglyceride. However, no such improvements were observed in control group. To evaluate telephone consultation effect, after the nutrition education session, 34 subjects of the 67 education group received telephone follow-up consultation once a month for 3 months. The others (33 subjects) had no further contact after the nutrition education session. Subjects in the telephone follow-up group showed a decrease in BMI, FBS, and HbA1c. Moreover, the subjects who did not receive telephone follow-up also showed significant decreases in BMI and FBS. These results indicated that our individually planned education program for one session was effective in rectifying dietary behavior problems and improving food exchange knowledge, and quality of diet, leading to an improvement in the clinical outcomes. In conclusion, our individualized nutrition education was effective in adherence to diet recommendation and in improving glycemic control and lipid concentrations, while follow-up by telephone helped to encourage the adherence to diet prescription.Entities:
Keywords: Nutrition education; diet behavior; nutritional knowledge; telephone consultation; type 2 diabetes
Year: 2009 PMID: 20098585 PMCID: PMC2809239 DOI: 10.4162/nrp.2009.3.4.315
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutr Res Pract ISSN: 1976-1457 Impact factor: 1.926
Fig. 1Curriculum of nutrition education
Baseline characteristics of the subjects in the intervention study
1)Mean ± SE
2)Maximum score for each question was 5 points and total maximum score was 30 points.
3)Maximum score for each question was 1 point and total maximum score was 12 points.
BMI = body mass index, WHR = Waist-to-hip ratio, SBP = systolic blood pressure, DBP = Diastolic blood pressure, FBS = fasting blood concentrations of glucose, HbA1c = Hemoglobin A1c
No significant differences were found all variables between education group and control group.
The change of dietary behavior and food exchange knowledge score after 3 months
1)Mean ± SE
2)Maximum score for each question was 5 points and total maximum score was 30 points.
3)Maximum score for each question was 1 point and total maximum score was 12 points.
Significantly different by paired t-test between baseline and after 3 months *P < 0.05, **P < 0.001
By repeated measured ANOVA between baseline and after 3 months after adjusting for sex (time *education interaction, P < 0.05)
The change of anthropometric and serological variables and nutrient intakes
1)Mean ± SE
Significantly different by paired t-test between baseline and after 3 months *P < 0.05, **P < 0.001
By repeated measured ANOVA between baseline and after 3 months after adjusting for sex (time *education interaction, P < 0.05)
The changes of anthropometric variables and serological variables according to telephone follow-up
1)Mean ± SE
2)After 3 months data represented the result according to the telephone follow up consultation of the 67 education group subjects after education session.
Significantly 6ifferent by paired t-test between baseline and after 3 months *P < 0.05, **P < 0.001
By repeated measured ANOVA between baseline and after 3 months after adjusting for sex (time *education interaction, P < 0.05)