Literature DB >> 20094045

Mitotic chromosomal instability and cancer: mouse modelling of the human disease.

Juan-Manuel Schvartzman1, Rocio Sotillo, Robert Benezra.   

Abstract

The stepwise progression from an early dysplastic lesion to full-blown metastatic malignancy is associated with increases in genomic instability. Mitotic chromosomal instability - the inability to faithfully segregate equal chromosome complements to two daughter cells during mitosis - is a widespread phenomenon in solid tumours that is thought to serve as the fuel for tumorigenic progression. How chromosome instability (CIN) arises in tumours and what consequences it has are still, however, hotly debated issues. Here we review the recent literature with an emphasis on models that recapitulate observations from human disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20094045      PMCID: PMC5526619          DOI: 10.1038/nrc2781

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer        ISSN: 1474-175X            Impact factor:   60.716


  196 in total

1.  Observation of Y(2175) in J/psi --> etaphif0 (980).

Authors:  M Ablikim; J Z Bai; Y Bai; Y Ban; X Cai; H F Chen; H S Chen; H X Chen; J C Chen; Jin Chen; X D Chen; Y B Chen; Y P Chu; Y S Dai; Z Y Deng; S X Du; J Fang; C D Fu; C S Gao; Y N Gao; S D Gu; Y T Gu; Y N Guo; Z J Guo; F A Harris; K L He; M He; Y K Heng; J Hou; H M Hu; T Hu; G S Huang; X T Huang; Y P Huang; X B Ji; X S Jiang; J B Jiao; D P Jin; S Jin; Y F Lai; H B Li; J Li; R Y Li; W D Li; W G Li; X L Li; X N Li; X Q Li; Y F Liang; H B Liao; B J Liu; C X Liu; Fang Liu; Feng Liu; H H Liu; H M Liu; J B Liu; J P Liu; H B Liu; J Liu; Q Liu; R G Liu; S Liu; Z A Liu; F Lu; G R Lu; J G Lu; C L Luo; F C Ma; H L Ma; L L Ma; Q M Ma; M Q A Malik; Z P Mao; X H Mo; J Nie; S L Olsen; R G Ping; N D Qi; H Qin; J F Qiu; G Rong; X D Ruan; L Y Shan; L Shang; C P Shen; D L Shen; X Y Shen; H Y Sheng; H S Sun; S S Sun; Y Z Sun; Z J Sun; X Tang; J P Tian; G L Tong; G S Varner; X Wan; L Wang; L L Wang; L S Wang; P Wang; P L Wang; W F Wang; Y F Wang; Z Wang; Z Y Wang; C L Wei; D H Wei; Y Weng; N Wu; X M Xia; X X Xie; G F Xu; X P Xu; Y Xu; M L Yan; H X Yang; M Yang; Y X Yang; M H Ye; Y X Ye; C X Yu; G W Yu; C Z Yuan; Y Yuan; S L Zang; Y Zeng; B X Zhang; B Y Zhang; C C Zhang; D H Zhang; H Q Zhang; H Y Zhang; J W Zhang; J Y Zhang; X Y Zhang; Y Y Zhang; Z X Zhang; Z P Zhang; D X Zhao; J W Zhao; M G Zhao; P P Zhao; Z G Zhao; H Q Zheng; J P Zheng; Z P Zheng; B Zhong L Zhou; K J Zhu; Q M Zhu; X W Zhu; Y C Zhu; Y S Zhu; Z A Zhu; Z L Zhu; B A Zhuang; B S Zou
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 9.161

2.  Pituitary tumor transforming gene overexpression facilitates pituitary tumor development.

Authors:  Ines Donangelo; Shiri Gutman; Eva Horvath; Kalman Kovacs; Kolja Wawrowsky; Michael Mount; Shlomo Melmed
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2006-06-29       Impact factor: 4.736

3.  Mad2 overexpression promotes aneuploidy and tumorigenesis in mice.

Authors:  Rocío Sotillo; Eva Hernando; Elena Díaz-Rodríguez; Julie Teruya-Feldstein; Carlos Cordón-Cardo; Scott W Lowe; Robert Benezra
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2006-12-28       Impact factor: 31.743

4.  Genetic and epigenetic inactivation of mitotic checkpoint genes hBUB1 and hBUBR1 and their relationship to survival.

Authors:  Masayoshi Shichiri; Keigo Yoshinaga; Hisashi Hisatomi; Kenichi Sugihara; Yukio Hirata
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Increased expression of mitotic checkpoint genes in breast cancer cells with chromosomal instability.

Authors:  Bibo Yuan; Yi Xu; Ju-Hyung Woo; Yunyue Wang; Young Kyung Bae; Dae-Sung Yoon; Robert P Wersto; Ellen Tully; Kathleen Wilsbach; Edward Gabrielson
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2006-01-15       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  A signature of chromosomal instability inferred from gene expression profiles predicts clinical outcome in multiple human cancers.

Authors:  Scott L Carter; Aron C Eklund; Isaac S Kohane; Lyndsay N Harris; Zoltan Szallasi
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2006-08-20       Impact factor: 38.330

7.  Improved grading of breast adenocarcinomas based on genomic instability.

Authors:  Ulrike Kronenwett; Sören Huwendiek; Carin Ostring; Neil Portwood; Uwe J Roblick; Yudi Pawitan; Ayodele Alaiya; Roland Sennerstam; Anders Zetterberg; Gert Auer
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2004-02-01       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Genomic stability and tumour suppression by the APC/C cofactor Cdh1.

Authors:  Irene García-Higuera; Eusebio Manchado; Pierre Dubus; Marta Cañamero; Juan Méndez; Sergio Moreno; Marcos Malumbres
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2008-06-15       Impact factor: 28.824

Review 9.  The spindle-assembly checkpoint in space and time.

Authors:  Andrea Musacchio; Edward D Salmon
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2007-04-11       Impact factor: 94.444

10.  Rae1 is an essential mitotic checkpoint regulator that cooperates with Bub3 to prevent chromosome missegregation.

Authors:  J Ramesh Babu; Karthik B Jeganathan; Darren J Baker; Xiaosheng Wu; Ningling Kang-Decker; Jan M van Deursen
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2003-01-27       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  228 in total

1.  Spontaneous transformation of murine epithelial cells requires the early acquisition of specific chromosomal aneuploidies and genomic imbalances.

Authors:  Hesed M Padilla-Nash; Karen Hathcock; Nicole E McNeil; David Mack; Daniel Hoeppner; Rea Ravin; Turid Knutsen; Raluca Yonescu; Danny Wangsa; Kathleen Dorritie; Linda Barenboim; Yue Hu; Thomas Ried
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 5.006

2.  MTBP plays a crucial role in mitotic progression and chromosome segregation.

Authors:  N Agarwal; Y Tochigi; A S Adhikari; S Cui; Y Cui; T Iwakuma
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 15.828

Review 3.  Tumor hypoxia and genetic alterations in sporadic cancers.

Authors:  Minoru Koi; Clement R Boland
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 1.730

4.  Coordinating postmitotic nuclear pore complex assembly with abscission timing.

Authors:  Douglas R Mackay; Katharine S Ullman
Journal:  Nucleus       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 4.197

Review 5.  Current status of molecularly targeted therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: basic science.

Authors:  Shinji Tanaka; Shigeki Arii
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Chromosomal instability: Coping with extra copies.

Authors:  Meera Swami
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 60.716

7.  Mus81 and Yen1 promote reciprocal exchange during mitotic recombination to maintain genome integrity in budding yeast.

Authors:  Chu Kwen Ho; Gerard Mazón; Alicia F Lam; Lorraine S Symington
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 8.  In the wrong place at the wrong time: does cyclin mislocalization drive oncogenic transformation?

Authors:  Jonathan D Moore
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 60.716

9.  Spindle checkpoint deficiency is tolerated by murine epidermal cells but not hair follicle stem cells.

Authors:  Floris Foijer; Tia DiTommaso; Giacomo Donati; Katta Hautaviita; Stephanie Z Xie; Emma Heath; Ian Smyth; Fiona M Watt; Peter K Sorger; Allan Bradley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Cyclin B2 and p53 control proper timing of centrosome separation.

Authors:  Hyun-Ja Nam; Jan M van Deursen
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 28.824

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.