Deena J Chisolm1, Tanjala S Purnell, Daniel M Cohen, Ann Scheck McAlearney. 1. The Center for Innovation in Pediatric Practice, The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43205, USA. deena.chisolm@nationwidechildrens.org
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to measure clinician perceptions of the recently implemented electronic medical record (EMR) system in a pediatric emergency department and off-site urgent care centers and to determine how user perceptions changed over time. METHODS: Physicians and nurses from the emergency department/urgent care center were recruited to complete an online survey at 3 points in time: 30 to 89 days (wave 1), 90 to 179 days (wave 2), and 180 to 270 days after implementation (wave 3). Potential predictors of initial satisfaction studied included effort expectancy, performance expectancy, social support, and facilitating conditions, along with user demographics and general attitudes toward technology. Bivariate relationships with satisfaction were assessed using the Wilcoxon rank sum test and correlation analysis. A final multivariate linear regression model was calculated. Change in satisfaction over time was tested using a Wilcoxon signed rank test. RESULTS: A total of 71 clinicians completed the surveys. Initial satisfaction was strongly associated with perceptions of training and support (facilitating conditions) and with perceived usefulness (performance expectancy). Satisfaction was not associated with user sex, age, or role (physician vs nurse). No significant change was found in any satisfaction measure at wave 2 or 3; however, satisfaction with functionality trended higher and satisfaction with reliability trended lower over the course of use. CONCLUSIONS: Satisfaction with an EMR at its launch generally persisted through the first year of use. Implementation plans must maximize the likelihood of achieving positive early impressions of training, support, and performance to engender high user satisfaction with the EMR.
OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to measure clinician perceptions of the recently implemented electronic medical record (EMR) system in a pediatric emergency department and off-site urgent care centers and to determine how user perceptions changed over time. METHODS: Physicians and nurses from the emergency department/urgent care center were recruited to complete an online survey at 3 points in time: 30 to 89 days (wave 1), 90 to 179 days (wave 2), and 180 to 270 days after implementation (wave 3). Potential predictors of initial satisfaction studied included effort expectancy, performance expectancy, social support, and facilitating conditions, along with user demographics and general attitudes toward technology. Bivariate relationships with satisfaction were assessed using the Wilcoxon rank sum test and correlation analysis. A final multivariate linear regression model was calculated. Change in satisfaction over time was tested using a Wilcoxon signed rank test. RESULTS: A total of 71 clinicians completed the surveys. Initial satisfaction was strongly associated with perceptions of training and support (facilitating conditions) and with perceived usefulness (performance expectancy). Satisfaction was not associated with user sex, age, or role (physician vs nurse). No significant change was found in any satisfaction measure at wave 2 or 3; however, satisfaction with functionality trended higher and satisfaction with reliability trended lower over the course of use. CONCLUSIONS: Satisfaction with an EMR at its launch generally persisted through the first year of use. Implementation plans must maximize the likelihood of achieving positive early impressions of training, support, and performance to engender high user satisfaction with the EMR.
Authors: Asif Ahmad; Phyllis Teater; Thomas D Bentley; Lynn Kuehn; Rajee R Kumar; Andrew Thomas; Hagop S Mekhjian Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2002 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: William B Lober; Lisa J Trigg; Bryant T Karras; David Bliss; Jack Ciliberti; Laurie Stewart; Jeffrey S Duchin Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 3.671
Authors: Antonios Likourezos; Donald B Chalfin; Daniel G Murphy; Barbara Sommer; Kelly Darcy; Steven J Davidson Journal: J Emerg Med Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 1.484
Authors: Richard Hillestad; James Bigelow; Anthony Bower; Federico Girosi; Robin Meili; Richard Scoville; Roger Taylor Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2005 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Aaron T Fleischauer; Benjamin J Silk; Mare Schumacher; Ken Komatsu; Sarah Santana; Victorio Vaz; Mitchell Wolfe; Lori Hutwagner; Joanne Cono; Ruth Berkelman; Tracee Treadwell Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: David A Hanauer; Greta L Branford; Grant Greenberg; Sharon Kileny; Mick P Couper; Kai Zheng; Sung W Choi Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2017-04-01 Impact factor: 4.497