BACKGROUND: Cervical collars are applied to millions of trauma victims with the intent of protecting against secondary spine injuries. Adverse clinical outcomes during the management of trauma patients led to the hypothesis that extrication collars may be harmful in some cases. The literature provides indirect support for this observation. The purpose of this study was to directly evaluate cervical biomechanics after application of a cervical collar in the presence of severe neck injury. METHODS: Cranial-caudal displacements in the upper cervical spine were measured in cadavers from images taken before and after application of collars following creation of an unstable upper cervical spine injury. RESULTS: In the presence of severe injury, collar application resulted in 7.3 mm +/- 4.0 mm of separation between C1 and C2 in a cadaver model. In general, collars had the effect of pushing the head away from the shoulders. CONCLUSIONS: This study was consistent with previous evidence that extrication collars can result in abnormal distraction within the upper cervical spine in the presence of a severe injury. These observations support the need to prioritize additional research to better understand the risks and benefits of cervical stabilization methods and to determine whether improved stabilization methods can help to avoid potentially harmful displacements between vertebrae.
BACKGROUND: Cervical collars are applied to millions of trauma victims with the intent of protecting against secondary spine injuries. Adverse clinical outcomes during the management of traumapatients led to the hypothesis that extrication collars may be harmful in some cases. The literature provides indirect support for this observation. The purpose of this study was to directly evaluate cervical biomechanics after application of a cervical collar in the presence of severe neck injury. METHODS: Cranial-caudal displacements in the upper cervical spine were measured in cadavers from images taken before and after application of collars following creation of an unstable upper cervical spine injury. RESULTS: In the presence of severe injury, collar application resulted in 7.3 mm +/- 4.0 mm of separation between C1 and C2 in a cadaver model. In general, collars had the effect of pushing the head away from the shoulders. CONCLUSIONS: This study was consistent with previous evidence that extrication collars can result in abnormal distraction within the upper cervical spine in the presence of a severe injury. These observations support the need to prioritize additional research to better understand the risks and benefits of cervical stabilization methods and to determine whether improved stabilization methods can help to avoid potentially harmful displacements between vertebrae.
Authors: M Kreinest; S Goller; G Rauch; B Gliwitzky; C Frank; S Matschke; C G Wölfl; M Münzberg Journal: Unfallchirurg Date: 2017-08 Impact factor: 1.000
Authors: S Scheidt; P P Roessler; S Pedrood; M Marinova; M Jaenisch; D Cucchi; G Hischebeth; C Burger; C Jacobs Journal: Unfallchirurg Date: 2019-12 Impact factor: 1.000
Authors: Bryan P Conrad; Diana L Marchese; Glenn R Rechtine; Mark Prasarn; Gianluca Del Rossi; Marybeth H Horodyski Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2013-08-16 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: M Kreinest; S Goller; B Gliwitzky; P A Grützner; M Küffer; D Häske; V Papathanassiou; M Münzberg Journal: Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg Date: 2016-05-12 Impact factor: 3.693
Authors: Bryan P Conrad; Gianluca Del Rossi; Mary Beth Horodyski; Mark L Prasarn; Yara Alemi; Glenn R Rechtine Journal: Surg Neurol Int Date: 2012-07-17