Literature DB >> 20093908

Effect of birth weight on adverse obstetric outcomes in vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.

Nicole Jastrow1, Stéphanie Roberge, Robert J Gauthier, Liny Laroche, Louise Duperron, Normand Brassard, Emmanuel Bujold.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the association between neonatal birth weight and adverse obstetric outcomes in women attempting vaginal birth after cesarean.
METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of all women undergoing a trial of labor after a prior low transverse cesarean delivery in our institution between 1987 and 2004. Patients were categorized according to birth weight (less than 3,500 g [group 1, reference], 3,500-3,999 g [group 2], and 4,000 g or more [group 3]) and prior vaginal delivery. The rates of failed trial of labor, uterine rupture, shoulder dystocia, and third- and fourth-degree perineal laceration were compared among groups. Multivariable logistic regressions were performed to adjust for potential confounding factors.
RESULTS: Of 2,586 women, 1,519 (59%), 798 (31%), and 269 (10%) were included in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Birth weight was directly correlated to the rate of failed trial of labor (19%, 28%, and 38% for groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively; P<.01), uterine rupture (0.9%, 1.8%, and 2.6%; P<.05), shoulder dystocia (0.3%, 1.6%, and 7.8%; P<.01), and third- and fourth-degree perineal laceration (5%, 7%, and 12%; P<.01). After adjustment for confounding variables, birth weight of 4,000 g or more remained associated with uterine rupture (odds ratio [OR] 2.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.001-6.85), failed trial of labor (OR 2.47, 95% CI 1.82-3.34), shoulder dystocia (OR 25.13, 95% CI 9.31-67.86), and third- and fourth-degree perineal laceration (OR 2.64, 95% CI 1.66-4.19).
CONCLUSION: Birth weight and specifically macrosomia are linked with failed trial of labor, uterine rupture, shoulder dystocia, and third- and fourth-degree perineal laceration in women who underwent prior cesarean delivery. Estimated fetal weight should be included in the decision-making process for all women contemplating a trial of labor after cesarean delivery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20093908     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181c915da

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  13 in total

Review 1.  Exercise for pregnant women with gestational diabetes for improving maternal and fetal outcomes.

Authors:  Julie Brown; Gilles Ceysens; Michel Boulvain
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-06-22

Review 2.  Lifestyle interventions for the treatment of women with gestational diabetes.

Authors:  Julie Brown; Nisreen A Alwan; Jane West; Stephen Brown; Christopher Jd McKinlay; Diane Farrar; Caroline A Crowther
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-05-04

3.  Effect of interpregnancy interval on the success rate of trial of labor after cesarean.

Authors:  A L Rietveld; P W Teunissen; B M Kazemier; C J M De Groot
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 2.521

4.  Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes Following Trial of Labor After Two Previous Cesareans: a Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Ayala Hirsch; Reut Rotem; Hen Y Sela; Arnon Samueloff; Sorina Grisaru-Granovsky; Misgav Rottenstreich
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 3.060

Review 5.  Oral anti-diabetic pharmacological therapies for the treatment of women with gestational diabetes.

Authors:  Julie Brown; Ruth Martis; Brenda Hughes; Janet Rowan; Caroline A Crowther
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-01-25

Review 6.  Different types of dietary advice for women with gestational diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Shanshan Han; Philippa Middleton; Emily Shepherd; Emer Van Ryswyk; Caroline A Crowther
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-02-25

Review 7.  Insulin for the treatment of women with gestational diabetes.

Authors:  Julie Brown; Luke Grzeskowiak; Kathryn Williamson; Michelle R Downie; Caroline A Crowther
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-11-05

Review 8.  Interventions for pregnant women with hyperglycaemia not meeting gestational diabetes and type 2 diabetes diagnostic criteria.

Authors:  Shanshan Han; Caroline A Crowther; Philippa Middleton
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-01-18

9.  Health economic modeling to assess short-term costs of maternal overweight, gestational diabetes, and related macrosomia - a pilot evaluation.

Authors:  Irene Lenoir-Wijnkoop; Eline M van der Beek; Johan Garssen; Mark J C Nuijten; Ricardo D Uauy
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 5.810

Review 10.  Professional ethics, VBAC and COVID-19 pandemic: A challenge to be resolved (Review).

Authors:  Alexandru Carauleanu; Ingrid Andrada Tanasa; Dragos Nemescu; Demetra Socolov
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 2.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.