Literature DB >> 20093748

Analysis of promoter activity in transgenic plants by normalizing expression with a reference gene: anomalies due to the influence of the test promoter on the reference promoter.

Simran Bhullar1, Suma Chakravarthy, Deepak Pental, Pradeep Kumar Burma.   

Abstract

Variations in transgene expression due to position effect and copy number are normalized when analysing and comparing the strengths of different promoters. In such experiments, the promoter to be tested is placed upstream to a reporter gene and a second expression cassette is introduced in a linked fashion in the same transfer DNA (T-DNA). Normalization in the activity of the test promoter is carried out by calculating the ratio of activities of the test and reference promoters. When an appropriate number of independent transgenic events are analysed, normalization facilitates assessment of the relative strengths of the test promoters being compared. In this study, using different modified versions of the Cauliflower Mosaic Virus (CaMV) 35S promoter expressing the reporter gene beta-glucuronidase (gus) (test cassette) linked to a chloramphenicol acetyl transferase (cat) gene under the wild-type 35S promoter (reference cassette) in transgenic tobacco lines, we observed that cat gene expression varied depending upon the strength of the modified 35S promoter expressing the gus gene. The 35S promoter in the reference cassette was found to have been upregulated in cases where the modified 35S promoter was weaker than the wild-type 35S promoter. Many studies have been carried out in different organisms to study the phenomenon of transcriptional interference, which refers to the reduced expression of the downstream promoter by a closely linked upstream promoter. However, we observed a positive interaction wherein the weakened activity of a promoter led to upregulation of a contiguous promoter. These observations suggest that, in situations where the promoters of the test and reference gene share the same transcription factors, the activity of the test promoter can influence the activity of the reference promoter in a way that the test promoter's strength is underestimated when normalized by the reference promoter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20093748     DOI: 10.1007/s12038-009-0109-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biosci        ISSN: 0250-5991            Impact factor:   1.826


  31 in total

1.  Transcriptional interference between convergent promoters caused by elongation over the promoter.

Authors:  Benjamin P Callen; Keith E Shearwin; J Barry Egan
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2004-06-04       Impact factor: 17.970

2.  Transcriptional interference in transgenic plants.

Authors:  I Ingelbrecht; P Breyne; K Vancompernolle; A Jacobs; M Van Montagu; A Depicker
Journal:  Gene       Date:  1991-12-30       Impact factor: 3.688

3.  Transgene expression variability (position effect) of CAT and GUS reporter genes driven by linked divergent T-DNA promoters.

Authors:  C Peach; J Velten
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 4.076

4.  Transcription through the roadblocks: the role of RNA polymerase cooperation.

Authors:  Vitaly Epshtein; Francine Toulmé; A Rachid Rahmouni; Sergei Borukhov; Evgeny Nudler
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2003-09-15       Impact factor: 11.598

5.  Characteristics of a strong promoter from figwort mosaic virus: comparison with the analogous 35S promoter from cauliflower mosaic virus and the regulated mannopine synthase promoter.

Authors:  M Sanger; S Daubert; R M Goodman
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 4.076

6.  Promoter occlusion: transcription through a promoter may inhibit its activity.

Authors:  S Adhya; M Gottesman
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Duplication of CaMV 35S Promoter Sequences Creates a Strong Enhancer for Plant Genes.

Authors:  R Kay; A Chan; M Daly; J McPherson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-06-05       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  The small, versatile pPZP family of Agrobacterium binary vectors for plant transformation.

Authors:  P Hajdukiewicz; Z Svab; P Maliga
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.076

9.  Strategies for development of functionally equivalent promoters with minimum sequence homology for transgene expression in plants: cis-elements in a novel DNA context versus domain swapping.

Authors:  Simran Bhullar; Suma Chakravarthy; Sonia Advani; Sudipta Datta; Deepak Pental; Pradeep Kumar Burma
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 8.340

10.  Properties of an isolated transcription stimulating sequence derived from the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter.

Authors:  J T Odell; S Knowlton; W Lin; C J Mauvais
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 4.076

View more
  6 in total

1.  A study on the influence of different promoter and 5'UTR (URM) cassettes from Arabidopsis thaliana on the expression level of the reporter gene β glucuronidase in tobacco and cotton.

Authors:  Parul Agarwal; Varsha Garg; Taru Gautam; Beena Pillai; Shaveta Kanoria; Pradeep Kumar Burma
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 2.788

2.  Genetically transformed tobacco plants expressing synthetic EPSPS gene confer tolerance against glyphosate herbicide.

Authors:  Muhammad Imran; Shaheen Asad; Andre Luiz Barboza; Esteban Galeano; Helaine Carrer; Zahid Mukhtar
Journal:  Physiol Mol Biol Plants       Date:  2017-03-14

3.  Identification of Leaf Promoters for Use in Transgenic Wheat.

Authors:  Saqer S Alotaibi; Caroline A Sparks; Martin A J Parry; Andrew J Simkin; Christine A Raines
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2018-03-28

4.  Aspartic protease inhibitor enhances resistance to potato virus Y and A in transgenic potato plants.

Authors:  Zhila Osmani; Mohammad Sadegh Sabet; Kenji S Nakahara
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 5.260

5.  Identification of a defense response gene involved in signaling pathways against PVA and PVY in potato.

Authors:  Zhila Osmani; Mohammad Sadegh Sabet; Kenji S Nakahara; Ali Mokhtassi-Bidgoli; Khabat Vahabi; Ahmad Moieni; Masoud Shams-Bakhsh
Journal:  GM Crops Food       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 3.074

Review 6.  Targeted genome editing of plants and plant cells for biomanufacturing.

Authors:  J F Buyel; E Stöger; L Bortesi
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.788

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.