RATIONALE: Transmural dispersion of repolarization has been shown to play a role in the genesis of ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation in different animal models of heart failure (HF). Heterogeneous changes of repolarization within the midmyocardial population of ventricular cells have been considered an important contributor to the HF phenotype. However, there is limited electrophysiological data from the human heart. OBJECTIVE: To study electrophysiological remodeling of transmural repolarization in the failing and nonfailing human hearts. METHODS AND RESULTS: We optically mapped the action potential duration (APD) in the coronary-perfused scar-free posterior-lateral left ventricular free wall wedge preparations from failing (n=5) and nonfailing (n=5) human hearts. During slow pacing (S1S1=2000 ms), in the nonfailing hearts we observed significant transmural APD gradient: subepicardial, midmyocardial, and subendocardial APD80 were 383+/-21, 455+/-20, and 494+/-22 ms, respectively. In 60% of nonfailing hearts (3 of 5), we found midmyocardial islands of cells that presented a distinctly long APD (537+/-40 ms) and a steep local APD gradient (27+/-7 ms/mm) compared with the neighboring myocardium. HF resulted in prolongation of APD80: 477+/-22 ms, 495+/-29 ms, and 506+/-35 ms for the subepi-, mid-, and subendocardium, respectively, while reducing transmural APD80 difference from 111+/-13 to 29+/-6 ms (P<0.005) and presence of any prominent local APD gradient. In HF, immunostaining revealed a significant reduction of connexin43 expression on the subepicardium. CONCLUSIONS: We present for the first time direct experimental evidence of a transmural APD gradient in the human heart. HF results in the heterogeneous prolongation of APD, which significantly reduces the transmural and local APD gradients.
RATIONALE: Transmural dispersion of repolarization has been shown to play a role in the genesis of ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation in different animal models of heart failure (HF). Heterogeneous changes of repolarization within the midmyocardial population of ventricular cells have been considered an important contributor to the HF phenotype. However, there is limited electrophysiological data from the human heart. OBJECTIVE: To study electrophysiological remodeling of transmural repolarization in the failing and nonfailing human hearts. METHODS AND RESULTS: We optically mapped the action potential duration (APD) in the coronary-perfused scar-free posterior-lateral left ventricular free wall wedge preparations from failing (n=5) and nonfailing (n=5) human hearts. During slow pacing (S1S1=2000 ms), in the nonfailing hearts we observed significant transmural APD gradient: subepicardial, midmyocardial, and subendocardial APD80 were 383+/-21, 455+/-20, and 494+/-22 ms, respectively. In 60% of nonfailing hearts (3 of 5), we found midmyocardial islands of cells that presented a distinctly long APD (537+/-40 ms) and a steep local APD gradient (27+/-7 ms/mm) compared with the neighboring myocardium. HF resulted in prolongation of APD80: 477+/-22 ms, 495+/-29 ms, and 506+/-35 ms for the subepi-, mid-, and subendocardium, respectively, while reducing transmural APD80 difference from 111+/-13 to 29+/-6 ms (P<0.005) and presence of any prominent local APD gradient. In HF, immunostaining revealed a significant reduction of connexin43 expression on the subepicardium. CONCLUSIONS: We present for the first time direct experimental evidence of a transmural APD gradient in the human heart. HF results in the heterogeneous prolongation of APD, which significantly reduces the transmural and local APD gradients.
Authors: C Antzelevitch; W Shimizu; G X Yan; S Sicouri; J Weissenburger; V V Nesterenko; A Burashnikov; J Di Diego; J Saffitz; G P Thomas Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 1999-08
Authors: Vijay S Chauhan; Eugene Downar; Kumaraswamy Nanthakumar; John D Parker; Heather J Ross; Wilson Chan; Peter Picton Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2005-08-19 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Alan P Benson; Olivier Bernus; Hans Dierckx; Stephen H Gilbert; John P Greenwood; Arun V Holden; Kevin Mohee; Sven Plein; Aleksandra Radjenovic; Michael E Ries; Godfrey L Smith; Steven Sourbron; Richard D Walton Journal: Interface Focus Date: 2010-12-03 Impact factor: 3.906
Authors: Rachel C Myles; Olivier Bernus; Francis L Burton; Stuart M Cobbe; Godfrey L Smith Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2010-10-01 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Larisa G Tereshchenko; Alan Cheng; Jason Park; Nicholas Wold; Timothy E Meyer; Michael R Gold; Suneet Mittal; Jagmeet Singh; Kenneth M Stein; Kenneth A Ellenbogen Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2015-08-10 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Lina Al Kury; Vadym Sydorenko; Manal M A Smail; Muhammad Anwar Qureshi; Anatoliy Shmygol; Murat Oz; Jaipaul Singh; Frank Christopher Howarth Journal: Mol Cell Biochem Date: 2018-01-09 Impact factor: 3.396
Authors: Eric K Johnson; Steven J Springer; Wei Wang; Edward J Dranoff; Yan Zhang; Evelyn M Kanter; Kathryn A Yamada; Jeanne M Nerbonne Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2018-01
Authors: Igor R Efimov; Vadim V Fedorov; Alexey Glukhov; Qing Lou; Christina Ambrosi; Deborah Janks; William J Hucker; Thomas Kurian; Richard B Schuessler; Nader Moazami Journal: Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc Date: 2010
Authors: Aida Oliván-Viguera; María Pérez-Zabalza; Laura García-Mendívil; Konstantinos A Mountris; Sofía Orós-Rodrigo; Estel Ramos-Marquès; José María Vallejo-Gil; Pedro Carlos Fresneda-Roldán; Javier Fañanás-Mastral; Manuel Vázquez-Sancho; Marta Matamala-Adell; Fernando Sorribas-Berjón; Javier André Bellido-Morales; Francisco Javier Mancebón-Sierra; Alexánder Sebastián Vaca-Núñez; Carlos Ballester-Cuenca; Miguel Ángel Marigil; Cristina Pastor; Laura Ordovás; Ralf Köhler; Emiliano Diez; Esther Pueyo Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-11-17 Impact factor: 4.379