Literature DB >> 21761231

Effects of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction on patellar tracking.

Keisuke Kita1, Shuji Horibe, Yukiyoshi Toritsuka, Norimasa Nakamura, Yoshinari Tanaka, Yasukazu Yonetani, Tatsuo Mae, Ken Nakata, Hideki Yoshikawa, Konsei Shino.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction has been performed to treat recurrent patellar dislocation. However, the effects on patellar tracking have not been well documented, particularly in patients. The purpose of this study is to compare patellar tracking pattern and chondral status at MPFL reconstruction with those at second-look arthroscopy.
METHODS: Between 1999 and 2008, 71 patients with recurrent patellar dislocation underwent MPFL reconstruction using a double-looped semitendinosus tendon. Of these, 25 knees in 24 patients underwent second-look arthroscopy (at 6-26 months after initial surgery), forming the subject for the present study. No other surgical procedures such as tibial tuberosity transfer, lateral release, or osteotomy were performed in any patients. To assess the patellar tracking pattern, the position of the patella on femoral groove was evaluated arthroscopically during passive knee motion through lateral suprapatellar portal.
RESULTS: Before MPFL reconstruction, the patella in all patients was shifted laterally throughout the entire range of knee motion. Immediately after MPFL reconstruction, patellar malalignment was corrected in all cases. On second-look arthroscopy, two different patellar tracking patterns were observed. In 9 knees, the patella was located on the center of the femoral groove throughout the range of motion. Meanwhile, in the remaining 16 knees, the patella was shifted laterally at knee extension and migrated to the center of femoral groove with increased knee flexion. No significant deteriorations in chondral status were seen on second-look arthroscopy.
CONCLUSION: The present study revealed that not all improved patellar trackings after MPFL reconstruction remained intact at follow-up. Chondral status in patellofemoral joint was not aggravated by MPFL reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic studies, Level IV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21761231     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-011-1609-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  42 in total

1.  Classification of lesions of the medial patello-femoral ligament in patellar dislocation.

Authors:  E Nomura
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  The relation of the femoral physis and the medial patellofemoral ligament.

Authors:  Kevin G Shea; Nathan L Grimm; Jen Belzer; Robert T Burks; Ronald Pfeiffer
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  The tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance; a comparative study between CT and MRI scanning.

Authors:  Philip B Schoettle; Marco Zanetti; Burkart Seifert; Christian W A Pfirrmann; Sandro F Fucentese; Jose Romero
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2005-07-14       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Neoligamentization process of BTPB used for ACL graft: histological evaluation from 6 months to 10 years.

Authors:  S Zaffagnini; V De Pasquale; L Marchesini Reggiani; A Russo; P Agati; B Bacchelli; M Marcacci
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2006-12-26       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  In vivo movement analysis of the patella using a three-dimensional computer model.

Authors:  Y Yamada; Y Toritsuka; S Horibe; K Sugamoto; H Yoshikawa; K Shino
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2007-06

6.  Patellofemoral contact area and pressure after medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Todd M Melegari; Brent G Parks; Leslie S Matthews
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Medial soft tissue restraints in lateral patellar instability and repair.

Authors:  P V Hautamaa; D C Fithian; K R Kaufman; D M Daniel; A M Pohlmeyer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  In vitro investigation of the effect of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction and medial tibial tuberosity transfer on lateral patellar stability.

Authors:  Sven Ostermeier; Christina Stukenborg-Colsman; Christof Hurschler; Carl-Joachim Wirth
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.772

9.  [Effect of arthroscopic fluid inflow on the femoro-patellar tracking. Comparative study of the dry and fluid filled knee].

Authors:  C Delaunay; T Kapandji
Journal:  Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot       Date:  1998-07

10.  Reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament with gracilis tendon autograft in transverse patellar drill holes.

Authors:  Svend Erik Christiansen; Bent W Jacobsen; Bent Lund; Martin Lind
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 4.772

View more
  20 in total

1.  The relationship between quadriceps angle and tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance in patients with patellar instability.

Authors:  A D Cooney; Z Kazi; N Caplan; M Newby; A St Clair Gibson; D F Kader
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Are the tubular grafts in the femoral tunnel in an anatomical or isometric position in the reconstruction of medial patellofemoral ligament?

Authors:  Panagiotis G Ntagiopoulos; Bharat Sharma; Simone Bignozzi; Nicola Lopomo; Francesca Colle; Stefano Zaffagnini; David Dejour
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-06-16       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Is tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance an appropriate measure for the identification of knees with patellar instability?

Authors:  N Caplan; D Lees; M Newby; A Ewen; R Jackson; A St Clair Gibson; D Kader
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  The horizontal Y-shaped graft with respective graft tension angles in anatomical two-bundle medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Hui Jun Kang; Jian Hui Cao; Shuo Pan; Xiao Jing Wang; Da Hai Yu; Zhi Min Zheng
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Fluoroscopic control allows for precise tunnel positioning in MPFL reconstruction.

Authors:  Vera Jaecker; Benedikt Brozat; Marc Banerjee; Robin Otchwemah; Bertil Bouillon; Sven Shafizadeh
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-05-10       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  The modified semi-tunnel bone bridge technique achieved statistically better knee function than the suture anchor technique.

Authors:  Gang Ji; Haoyu Wang; Xiaoqing Su; Jinliang Wang; Fei Wang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Clinical outcome in MPFL reconstruction with and without tuberositas transposition.

Authors:  A Mulliez; D Lambrecht; D Verbruggen; C Van Der Straeten; P Verdonk; J Victor
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Complications of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction using two transverse patellar tunnels.

Authors:  Loes Schiphouwer; Akkie Rood; Siebren Tigchelaar; Sander Koëter
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Anatomical factors influencing patellar tracking in the unstable patellofemoral joint.

Authors:  Rahul Biyani; John J Elias; Archana Saranathan; Hao Feng; Loredana M Guseila; Melanie A Morscher; Kerwyn C Jones
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-07-26       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Dynamic tracking influenced by anatomy following medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction: Computational simulation.

Authors:  John J Elias; Kerwyn C Jones; S Cyrus Rezvanifar; Joseph N Gabra; Melanie A Morscher; Andrew J Cosgarea
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.