Literature DB >> 20091914

Ceramic scaffolds produced by computer-assisted 3D printing and sintering: characterization and biocompatibility investigations.

Patrick H Warnke1, Hermann Seitz, Frauke Warnke, Stephan T Becker, Sureshan Sivananthan, Eugene Sherry, Qin Liu, Jörg Wiltfang, Timothy Douglas.   

Abstract

Hydroxyapatite (HAP) and tricalcium phosphate (TCP) are two very common ceramic materials for bone replacement. However, in general HAP and TCP scaffolds are not tailored to the exact dimensions of the defect site and are mainly used as granules or beads. Some scaffolds are available as ordinary blocks, but cannot be customized for individual perfect fit. Using computer-assisted 3D printing, an emerging rapid prototyping technique, individual three-dimensional ceramic scaffolds can be built up from TCP or HAP powder layer by layer with subsequent sintering. These scaffolds have precise dimensions and highly defined and regular internal characteristics such as pore size. External shape and internal characteristics such as pore size can be fabricated using Computer Assisted Design (CAD) based on individual patient data. Thus, these scaffolds could be designed as perfect fit replacements to reconstruct the patient's skeleton. Before their use as bone replacement materials in vivo, in vitro testing of these scaffolds is necessary. In this study, the behavior of human osteoblasts on HAP and TCP scaffolds was investigated. The commonly used bone replacement material BioOss(R) served as control. Biocompatibility was assessed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), fluorescence microscopy after staining for cell vitality with fluorescin diacetate (FDA) and propidium iodide (PI) and the MTT, LDH, and WST biocompatibility tests. Both versions were colonised by human osteoblasts, however more cells were seen on HAP scaffolds than TCP scaffolds. Cell vitality staining and MTT, LDH, and WST tests showed superior biocompatibility of HAP scaffolds to BioOss, while BioOss was more compatible than TCP. Further experiments are necessary to determine biocompatibility in vivo. Future modifications of 3D printed scaffolds offer advantageous features for Tissue Engineering. The integration of channels could allow for vascular and nerve ingrowth into the scaffold. Also the complex shapes of convex and concave articulating joint surfaces maybe realized with these rapid prototyping techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20091914     DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.31577

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater        ISSN: 1552-4973            Impact factor:   3.368


  33 in total

Review 1.  Scaffold translation: barriers between concept and clinic.

Authors:  Scott J Hollister; William L Murphy
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 6.389

2.  A synergistic approach to the design, fabrication and evaluation of 3D printed micro and nano featured scaffolds for vascularized bone tissue repair.

Authors:  Benjamin Holmes; Kartik Bulusu; Michael Plesniak; Lijie Grace Zhang
Journal:  Nanotechnology       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 3.874

3.  3D Printing of Personalized Artificial Bone Scaffolds.

Authors:  Shailly H Jariwala; Gregory S Lewis; Zachary J Bushman; James H Adair; Henry J Donahue
Journal:  3D Print Addit Manuf       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 5.449

Review 4.  3D Printing of Calcium Phosphate Ceramics for Bone Tissue Engineering and Drug Delivery.

Authors:  Ryan Trombetta; Jason A Inzana; Edward M Schwarz; Stephen L Kates; Hani A Awad
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 3.934

5.  Random Fiber Networks With Superior Properties Through Network Topology Control.

Authors:  S Deogekar; Z Yan; R C Picu
Journal:  J Appl Mech       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 2.168

6.  3D Printing for Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Dylan Jack Richards; Yu Tan; Jia Jia; Hai Yao; Ying Mei
Journal:  Isr J Chem       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 7.  3D Printing of Scaffolds for Tissue Regeneration Applications.

Authors:  Anh-Vu Do; Behnoush Khorsand; Sean M Geary; Aliasger K Salem
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 9.933

8.  3D printed hyperelastic "bone" scaffolds and regional gene therapy: A novel approach to bone healing.

Authors:  Ram Alluri; Adam Jakus; Sofia Bougioukli; William Pannell; Osamu Sugiyama; Amy Tang; Ramille Shah; Jay R Lieberman
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 4.396

9.  Rapid prototyping in orthopaedic surgery: a user's guide.

Authors:  Mark Frame; James S Huntley
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-05-01

10.  CAD/CAM scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: investigation of biocompatibility of selective laser melted lightweight titanium.

Authors:  Hendrik Naujokat; Johanna Rohwedder; Aydin Gülses; Oral Cenk Aktas; Jörg Wiltfang; Yahya Açil
Journal:  IET Nanobiotechnol       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 1.847

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.