Literature DB >> 2009125

MR imaging of the knee: clarification of its role.

M A Kelly1, T J Flock, J A Kimmel, H A Kiernan, R S Singson, R B Starron, F Feldman.   

Abstract

In an attempt to further delineate the role of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in evaluating knee pathology, a retrospective study of 60 patients who underwent MR scanning before arthroscopy was undertaken. For medial meniscus tears, the sensitivity of MR imaging was 97% whereas its specificity was 77%. For lateral meniscus tears, MR imaging was 90% sensitive and 87% specific. The positive predictive value of MR imaging was 85% for medial meniscus tears and only 79% for lateral meniscus tears. The negative predictive value was 95% for the medial meniscus and 94% for the lateral meniscus. MR imaging had an accuracy of 93% in assessing anterior cruciate ligament pathology also. These results begin to clarify the role of MR imaging in evaluating intraarticular knee pathology. Grade III signals represented tears at arthroscopy more than 90% of the time. False-positive results occurred more frequently than false negative results did. The high negative predictive value of MR imaging indicates that with a negative MR image, the orthopaedist can reliably conclude that no meniscal pathology is present. MR imaging is a useful diagnostic tool; however, it should be used selectively and in conjunction with the clinical examination in evaluating internal derangements of the knee.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2009125     DOI: 10.1016/0749-8063(91)90083-a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  20 in total

Review 1.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee.

Authors:  W D Prickett; S I Ward; M J Matava
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 2.  The menisci: basic science and advances in treatment.

Authors:  E Rath; J C Richmond
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 13.800

3.  Measuring the anterior cruciate ligament's footprints by three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Yung Han; David Kurzencwyg; Adam Hart; Tom Powell; Paul A Martineau
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  2D and 3D 3-tesla magnetic resonance imaging of the double bundle structure in anterior cruciate ligament anatomy.

Authors:  Hanno Steckel; Gianluca Vadala; Denise Davis; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-08-26       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Clinical, MRI, and arthroscopic correlation in meniscal and anterior cruciate ligament injuries.

Authors:  F Rayan; Sachin Bhonsle; Divyang D Shukla
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-02-23       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  3-T MR imaging of partial ACL tears: a cadaver study.

Authors:  Hanno Steckel; Gianluca Vadala; Denise Davis; Volker Musahl; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-05-12       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Impact of MRI on a knee arthroscopy waiting list.

Authors:  R L Williams; L A Williams; R Watura; J A Fairclough
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  Age-related magnetic resonance imaging morphology of the menisci in asymptomatic individuals.

Authors:  J Jerosch; W H Castro; J Assheuer
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.067

9.  Early magnetic resonance imaging in acute knee injury: a cost analysis.

Authors:  Nirav K Patel; Andrew Bucknill; David Ahearne; Janet Denning; Kailash Desai; Martin Watson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  A deceptive MRI appearance of the medial meniscus in a 14 year old boy: a case report.

Authors:  Padmanabhan Subramanian; Charles A Willis-Owen; David G Houlihan-Burne
Journal:  Cases J       Date:  2009-01-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.