Literature DB >> 20089807

The application of target information and preclinical pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling in predicting clinical doses of a Dickkopf-1 antibody for osteoporosis.

Alison M Betts1, Tracey H Clark, Jianxin Yang, Judith L Treadway, Mei Li, Michael A Giovanelli, Yasmina Abdiche, Donna M Stone, Vishwas M Paralkar.   

Abstract

PF-04840082 is a humanized prototype anti-Dickkopf-1 (Dkk-1) immunoglobulin isotype G(2) (IgG(2)) antibody for the treatment of osteoporosis. In vitro, PF-04840082 binds to human, monkey, rat, and mouse Dkk-1 with high affinity. After administration of PF-04840082 to rat and monkey, free Dkk-1 concentrations decreased rapidly and returned to baseline in a dose-dependent manner. In rat and monkey, PF-04840082 exhibited nonlinear pharmacokinetics (PK) and a target-mediated drug disposition (TMDD) model was used to characterize PF-04840082 versus Dkk-1 concentration response relationship. PK/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modeling enabled estimation of antibody non-target-mediated elimination, Dkk-1 turnover, complex formation, and complex elimination. The TMDD model was translated to human to predict efficacious dose and minimum anticipated biological effect level (MABEL) by incorporating information on typical IgG(2) human PK, antibody-target association/dissociation rates, Dkk-1 expression, and turnover rates. The PK/PD approach to MABEL was compared with the standard "no adverse effect level" (NOAEL) approach to calculating clinical starting doses and a pharmacological equilibrium method. The NOAEL method gave estimates of dose that were too high to ensure safety of clinical trials. The pharmacological equilibrium approach calculated receptor occupancy (RO) based on equilibrium dissociation constant alone and did not take into account rate of turnover of the target or antibody-target complex kinetics and, as a result, it likely produced a substantial overprediction of RO at a given dose. It was concluded that the calculation of MABEL according to the TMDD model was the most appropriate means for ensuring safety and efficacy in clinical studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20089807     DOI: 10.1124/jpet.109.164129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther        ISSN: 0022-3565            Impact factor:   4.030


  30 in total

Review 1.  Inflammatory bone loss: pathogenesis and therapeutic intervention.

Authors:  Kurt Redlich; Josef S Smolen
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 84.694

2.  Properties of a general PK/PD model of antibody-ligand interactions for therapeutic antibodies that bind to soluble endogenous targets.

Authors:  Jasmine P Davda; Ryan J Hansen
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 5.857

Review 3.  Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations for the next generation protein therapeutics.

Authors:  Dhaval K Shah
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 2.745

Review 4.  Bioanalytical approaches to quantify "total" and "free" therapeutic antibodies and their targets: technical challenges and PK/PD applications over the course of drug development.

Authors:  Jean W Lee; Marian Kelley; Lindsay E King; Jihong Yang; Hossein Salimi-Moosavi; Meina T Tang; Jian-Feng Lu; John Kamerud; Ago Ahene; Heather Myler; Cindy Rogers
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2011-01-15       Impact factor: 4.009

5.  Quantitative prediction of human pharmacokinetics for mAbs exhibiting target-mediated disposition.

Authors:  Aman P Singh; Wojciech Krzyzanski; Steven W Martin; Gregory Weber; Alison Betts; Alaa Ahmad; Anson Abraham; Anup Zutshi; John Lin; Pratap Singh
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 6.  Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling in inflammation.

Authors:  Hoi-Kei Lon; Dongyang Liu; William J Jusko
Journal:  Crit Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2012

Review 7.  Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modelling of monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  Miroslav Dostalek; Iain Gardner; Brian M Gurbaxani; Rachel H Rose; Manoranjenni Chetty
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 6.447

8.  Mechanistic pharmacokinetic/target engagement/pharmacodynamic (PK/TE/PD) modeling in deciphering interplay between a monoclonal antibody and its soluble target in cynomolgus monkeys.

Authors:  Weirong Wang; Xiaofeng Wang; Rajitha Doddareddy; Damien Fink; Thomas McIntosh; Hugh M Davis; Honghui Zhou
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 4.009

9.  Agonistic TAM-163 antibody targeting tyrosine kinase receptor-B: applying mechanistic modeling to enable preclinical to clinical translation and guide clinical trial design.

Authors:  Yulia Vugmeyster; Cynthia Rohde; Mylene Perreault; Ruth E Gimeno; Pratap Singh
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 5.857

10.  Predicting the effects of 8C2, a monoclonal anti-topotecan antibody, on plasma and tissue disposition of topotecan.

Authors:  Dhaval K Shah; Joseph P Balthasar
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2013-12-25       Impact factor: 2.745

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.