Literature DB >> 19276322

Renal lesions: characterization with diffusion-weighted imaging versus contrast-enhanced MR imaging.

Bachir Taouli1, Ravi K Thakur, Lorenzo Mannelli, James S Babb, Sooah Kim, Elizabeth M Hecht, Vivian S Lee, Gary M Israel.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted (DW) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with that of contrast material-enhanced (CE) MR imaging and to assess the performance of these examinations combined for the characterization of renal lesions, with MR follow-up and histopathologic analysis as the reference standards.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The institutional review board waived the requirement of informed patient consent for this retrospective HIPAA-compliant study. One hundred nine renal lesions in 64 patients (46 men, 18 women; mean age, 60.7 years) were evaluated with CE MR imaging and breath-hold DW imaging performed with various b values. Renal lesions were characterized with use of CE MR criteria, and apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) were measured. The ADCs of benign and malignant lesions were compared at Mann-Whitney testing. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to assess the accuracy of DW imaging and CE MR imaging in the diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma (RCC).
RESULTS: The 109 renal lesions--81 benign lesions and 28 RCCs--had a mean diameter of 4.2 cm +/- 2.5 (standard deviation). The mean ADC for RCCs (1.41 x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec +/- 0.61) was significantly lower (P < .0001) than that for benign lesions (2.23 x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec +/- 0.87) at DW imaging performed with b values of 0, 400, and 800 sec/mm(2). At a cutoff ADC of less than or equal to 1.92 x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec, the area under the ROC curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity of DW imaging for the diagnosis of RCCs (excluding angiomyolipomas) were 0.856, 86%, and 80%, respectively. The corresponding AUC, sensitivity, and specificity of CE MR imaging were 0.944, 100%, and 89%, respectively. Combined DW and CE MR imaging had 96% specificity. The AUC for the DW imaging-based diagnosis of solid RCC versus oncocytoma was 0.854. Papillary RCCs had lower ADCs than nonpapillary RCCs.
CONCLUSION: DW imaging can be used to characterize renal lesions; however, compared with CE MR imaging, it is less accurate. DW imaging can be used to differentiate solid RCCs from oncocytomas and characterize the histologic subtypes of RCC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19276322     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2512080880

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  99 in total

1.  Measurement of SUVmax plus ADCmin of the primary tumour is a predictor of prognosis in patients with cervical cancer.

Authors:  Keiichiro Nakamura; Ikuo Joja; Junichi Kodama; Atsushi Hongo; Yuji Hiramatsu
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  Noncontrast functional MRI of the kidneys.

Authors:  Lorenzo Mannelli; Jeffrey H Maki; Sherif F Osman; Hersh Chandarana; David J Lomas; William P Shuman; Ken F Linnau; Douglas E Green; Giacomo Laffi; Miriam Moshiri
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 3.  [Functional magnetic resonance imaging of the kidneys].

Authors:  R S Lanzman; M Notohamiprodjo; H J Wittsack
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 4.  Diffusion-weighted MRI of renal cell carcinoma, upper tract urothelial carcinoma, and renal infection: a pictorial review.

Authors:  Jonathan R Cogley; Dustin D Nguyen; Peter M Ghobrial; Dmitry Rakita
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 2.374

5.  Diffusion-weighted imaging versus contrast-enhanced MR imaging for the differentiation of renal oncocytomas and chromophobe renal cell carcinomas.

Authors:  Yan Zhong; Haiyi Wang; Yanguang Shen; Aitao Guo; Jia Wang; Suhai Kang; Lu Ma; Jingjing Pan; Huiyi Ye
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Quantitative assessment of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in patients with primary rectal cancer: correlation with FDG-PET/CT.

Authors:  Jing Gu; Pek-Lan Khong; Silun Wang; Queenie Chan; Wailun Law; Jingbo Zhang
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2010-09-25       Impact factor: 3.488

7.  Variability of renal apparent diffusion coefficients: limitations of the monoexponential model for diffusion quantification.

Authors:  Jeff L Zhang; Eric E Sigmund; Hersh Chandarana; Henry Rusinek; Qun Chen; Pierre-Hugues Vivier; Bachir Taouli; Vivian S Lee
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 8.  [Noninvasive phenotyping of renal tumors-current state of the art].

Authors:  Hubert Stefan Bickel
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 0.635

9.  Apparent Diffusion Coefficient is a Useful Biomarker for Monitoring Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy of Renal Ischemic-Reperfusion Injury.

Authors:  Sheung-Fat Ko; Hon-Kan Yip; Chen-Chang Lee; Chia-Chang Lee; Chia-Hao Su; Chung-Cheng Huang; Shu-Hang Ng; Yi-Ling Chen; Min-Chi Chen
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 10.  DW-MRI of the urogenital tract: applications in oncology.

Authors:  G Petralia; H C Thoeny
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 3.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.