Literature DB >> 2008953

Intrathecal morphine 0.2 mg versus epidural bupivacaine 0.125% or their combination: effects on parturients.

E Abouleish1, N Rawal, J Shaw, T Lorenz, M N Rashad.   

Abstract

To compare the efficacy and side effects of 0.2 mg intrathecal (IT) morphine with 0.125% epidural bupivacaine, 62 women in labor were studied. They were randomly divided into three groups: group 1 (n = 20) received IT morphine; group 2 (n = 22) received epidural bupivacaine; and group 3 (n = 20) received a combination of both using a combined spinal-epidural (CSE) technique. According to a visual analogue scale for assessing analgesia, neither IT 0.2 mg morphine nor 10 ml 0.125% epidural bupivacaine was effective in producing adequate pain relief in labor, whereas the combination produced excellent analgesia. The use of IT morphine significantly reduced the dosage requirement of epidural bupivacaine. The incidence of nausea, vomiting, and pruritus was significantly higher when IT morphine had been administered, whereas that of urinary retention did not differ. No serious respiratory depression occurred in any of the patients. When the course of labor was studied, the prior use of IT morphine significantly prolonged the duration of the first stage of labor and the total duration of labor. We conclude that the administration of 0.2 mg IT morphine in combination with epidural administration of 0.125% bupivacaine provides better analgesia than the administration of either drug alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2008953     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199104000-00015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  13 in total

Review 1.  Single-dose intrathecal analgesia to control labour pain: is it a useful alternative to epidural analgesia?

Authors:  R G Minty; Len Kelly; Alana Minty; D C Hammett
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 2.  Combined spinal-epidural versus epidural analgesia in labour.

Authors:  Scott W Simmons; Neda Taghizadeh; Alicia T Dennis; Damien Hughes; Allan M Cyna
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-10-17

Review 3.  Adverse effects and drug interactions associated with local and regional anaesthesia.

Authors:  M Naguib; M M Magboul; A H Samarkandi; M Attia
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 5.606

4.  Intrathecal fentanyl prolongs sensory bupivacaine spinal block.

Authors:  H Singh; J Yang; K Thornton; A H Giesecke
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 5.  Side effects of intrathecal and epidural opioids.

Authors:  M A Chaney
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 5.063

6.  [The clinical use of spinal opioids, part 1].

Authors:  N Rawal
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  1996-08-26       Impact factor: 1.107

7.  Combined spinal-epidural analgesia in advanced labour.

Authors:  A Abouleish; E Abouleish; W Camann
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 8.  Spinal anaesthesia in obstetrics.

Authors:  P Morgan
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 5.063

9.  Midazolam for caudal analgesia in children: comparison with caudal bupivacaine.

Authors:  M Naguib; M el Gammal; Y S Elhattab; M Seraj
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 5.063

10.  Comparison of Single-Shot Intrathecal Morphine Injection and Continuous Epidural Bupivacaine for Post-Operative Analgaesia after Elective Abdominal Hysterectomy.

Authors:  Wan Mohd Nazaruddin Wan Hassan; Anafairos Md Nayan; Azmi Abu Hassan; Rhendra Hardy Mohamad Zaini
Journal:  Malays J Med Sci       Date:  2017-12-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.