Literature DB >> 20089465

Individual differences and weight bias: Do people with an anti-fat bias have a pro-thin bias?

Robert A Carels1, Dara R Musher-Eizenman.   

Abstract

While levels of weight bias vary among individuals, it is not clear why one person possesses stronger anti-fat attitudes than another person. This investigation examined whether individual differences commonly associated with greater anti-fat bias are also associated with a greater preference for thinness among people of varying levels of weight. Young adults (62% women; 84% Caucasian) recruited from psychology classes (N=308) rated four male and female figures with approximate BMIs of 18.5, 25, 30, and 40, on measures of dislike and personality characteristics and completed measures assessing weight controllability, attitudes toward the obese, and perceptual reliance. Greater negative attitudes, weight controllability beliefs, and perceptual reliance were positively associated with greater dislike and negative personality attributes among obese/severely obese figures, but inversely related among low normal weight figures. Individuals who judge others based on physical features or who view obesity as controllable evidence greater weight bias and a stronger preference for thin body types. Copyright 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20089465      PMCID: PMC3164982          DOI: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2009.11.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Body Image        ISSN: 1740-1445


  19 in total

1.  Body size stigmatization in preschool children: the role of control attributions.

Authors:  Dara R Musher-Eizenman; Shayla C Holub; Amy Barnhart Miller; Sara E Goldstein; Laura Edwards-Leeper
Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol       Date:  2004-12

2.  Changes in perceived weight discrimination among Americans, 1995-1996 through 2004-2006.

Authors:  Tatiana Andreyeva; Rebecca M Puhl; Kelly D Brownell
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2008-02-28       Impact factor: 5.002

3.  Fat phobia scale revisited: the short form.

Authors:  J G Bacon; K E Scheltema; B E Robinson
Journal:  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord       Date:  2001-02

4.  Confronting and coping with weight stigma: an investigation of overweight and obese adults.

Authors:  Rebecca M Puhl; Kelly D Brownell
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.002

5.  When ideology hurts: effects of belief in the protestant ethic and feeling overweight on the psychological well-being of women.

Authors:  D M Quinn; J Crocker
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1999-08

6.  Weight stigmatization and ideological beliefs: relation to psychological functioning in obese adults.

Authors:  Kelli E Friedman; Simona K Reichmann; Philip R Costanzo; Arnaldo Zelli; Jamile A Ashmore; Gerard J Musante
Journal:  Obes Res       Date:  2005-05

7.  The impact of target weight and gender on perceptions of likeability, personality attributes, and functional impairment.

Authors:  Dara Musher-Eizenman; Robert A Carels
Journal:  Obes Facts       Date:  2009-09-10       Impact factor: 3.942

Review 8.  Stigma, obesity, and the health of the nation's children.

Authors:  Rebecca M Puhl; Janet D Latner
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 17.737

9.  Understanding self-directed stigma: development of the weight bias internalization scale.

Authors:  Laura E Durso; Janet D Latner
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 5.002

10.  BMI compared with 3-dimensional body shape: the UK National Sizing Survey.

Authors:  Jonathan C K Wells; Philip Treleaven; Tim J Cole
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 7.045

View more
  3 in total

1.  Gender differences in weight bias internalisation and eating pathology in overweight individuals.

Authors:  Rebecca G Boswell; Marney A White
Journal:  Adv Eat Disord       Date:  2015-08-25

2.  The Multifaceted Nature of Weight-Related Self-Stigma: Validation of the Two-Factor Weight Bias Internalization Scale (WBIS-2F).

Authors:  Angela Meadows; Suzanne Higgs
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-04-16

3.  "It's Not Good for the Animals, but I Think It Should Be Done"-Using Focus Group Interviews to Explore Adolescent Views on Animal Experimentation.

Authors:  Sonja M Enzinger; Christian Dürnberger
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 3.231

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.