Literature DB >> 20089247

Unconscious reward cues increase invested effort, but do not change speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Erik Bijleveld1, Ruud Custers, Henk Aarts.   

Abstract

While both conscious and unconscious reward cues enhance effort to work on a task, previous research also suggests that conscious rewards may additionally affect speed-accuracy tradeoffs. Based on this idea, two experiments explored whether reward cues that are presented above (supraliminal) or below (subliminal) the threshold of conscious awareness affect such tradeoffs differently. In a speed-accuracy paradigm, participants had to solve an arithmetic problem to attain a supraliminally or subliminally presented high-value or low-value coin. Subliminal high (vs. low) rewards made participants more eager (i.e., faster, but equally accurate). In contrast, supraliminal high (vs. low) rewards caused participants to become more cautious (i.e., slower, but more accurate). However, the effects of supraliminal rewards mimicked those of subliminal rewards when the tendency to make speed-accuracy tradeoffs was reduced. These findings suggest that reward cues initially boost effort regardless of whether or not people are aware of them, but affect speed-accuracy tradeoffs only when the reward information is accessible to consciousness. Copyright 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20089247     DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.12.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  34 in total

1.  The time course of cognitive control implementation.

Authors:  Clio Janssens; Esther De Loof; Gilles Pourtois; Tom Verguts
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-08

Review 2.  Closed-loop brain training: the science of neurofeedback.

Authors:  Ranganatha Sitaram; Tomas Ros; Luke Stoeckel; Sven Haller; Frank Scharnowski; Jarrod Lewis-Peacock; Nikolaus Weiskopf; Maria Laura Blefari; Mohit Rana; Ethan Oblak; Niels Birbaumer; James Sulzer
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  The effects of expected reward on creative problem solving.

Authors:  Irene Cristofori; Carola Salvi; Mark Beeman; Jordan Grafman
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  The influence of reward associations on conflict processing in the Stroop task.

Authors:  Ruth M Krebs; Carsten N Boehler; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2010-09-22

Review 5.  Mechanisms of motivation-cognition interaction: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Todd S Braver; Marie K Krug; Kimberly S Chiew; Wouter Kool; J Andrew Westbrook; Nathan J Clement; R Alison Adcock; Deanna M Barch; Matthew M Botvinick; Charles S Carver; Roshan Cools; Ruud Custers; Anthony Dickinson; Carol S Dweck; Ayelet Fishbach; Peter M Gollwitzer; Thomas M Hess; Derek M Isaacowitz; Mara Mather; Kou Murayama; Luiz Pessoa; Gregory R Samanez-Larkin; Leah H Somerville
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  The influence of threat and aversive motivation on conflict processing in the Stroop task.

Authors:  Ming-Ray Liao; Laurent Grégoire; Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Nonconscious activation of placebo and nocebo pain responses.

Authors:  Karin B Jensen; Ted J Kaptchuk; Irving Kirsch; Jacqueline Raicek; Kara M Lindstrom; Chantal Berna; Randy L Gollub; Martin Ingvar; Jian Kong
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Cueing task goals and earning money: Relatively high monetary rewards reduce failures to act on goals in a Stroop task.

Authors:  Harm Veling; Henk Aarts
Journal:  Motiv Emot       Date:  2010-03-30

9.  Motivation from control.

Authors:  Baruch Eitam; Patrick M Kennedy; E Tory Higgins
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Utilization of reward-prospect enhances preparatory attention and reduces stimulus conflict.

Authors:  Berry van den Berg; Ruth M Krebs; Monicque M Lorist; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.282

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.