Literature DB >> 20088021

Screen and clean: a tool for identifying interactions in genome-wide association studies.

Jing Wu1, Bernie Devlin, Steven Ringquist, Massimo Trucco, Kathryn Roeder.   

Abstract

Epistasis could be an important source of risk for disease. How interacting loci might be discovered is an open question for genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Most researchers limit their statistical analyses to testing individual pairwise interactions (i.e., marginal tests for association). A more effective means of identifying important predictors is to fit models that include many predictors simultaneously (i.e., higher-dimensional models). We explore a procedure called screen and clean (SC) for identifying liability loci, including interactions, by using the lasso procedure, which is a model selection tool for high-dimensional regression. We approach the problem by using a varying dictionary consisting of terms to include in the model. In the first step the lasso dictionary includes only main effects. The most promising single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are identified using a screening procedure. Next the lasso dictionary is adjusted to include these main effects and the corresponding interaction terms. Again, promising terms are identified using lasso screening. Then significant terms are identified through the cleaning process. Implementation of SC for GWAS requires algorithms to explore the complex model space induced by the many SNPs genotyped and their interactions. We propose and explore a set of algorithms and find that SC successfully controls Type I error while yielding good power to identify risk loci and their interactions. When the method is applied to data obtained from the Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium study of Type 1 Diabetes it uncovers evidence supporting interaction within the HLA class II region as well as within Chromosome 12q24.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20088021      PMCID: PMC2915560          DOI: 10.1002/gepi.20459

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Epidemiol        ISSN: 0741-0395            Impact factor:   2.135


  42 in total

1.  Efficiency and power in genetic association studies.

Authors:  Paul I W de Bakker; Roman Yelensky; Itsik Pe'er; Stacey B Gabriel; Mark J Daly; David Altshuler
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2005-10-23       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Alkes L Price; Nick J Patterson; Robert M Plenge; Michael E Weinblatt; Nancy A Shadick; David Reich
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2006-07-23       Impact factor: 38.330

3.  Powerful multilocus tests of genetic association in the presence of gene-gene and gene-environment interactions.

Authors:  Nilanjan Chatterjee; Zeynep Kalaylioglu; Roxana Moslehi; Ulrike Peters; Sholom Wacholder
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2006-10-20       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Evaluating statistical significance in two-stage genomewide association studies.

Authors:  D Y Lin
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2006-01-11       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Genes, environment, health, and disease: facing up to complexity.

Authors:  Teri A Manolio; Francis S Collins
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2007-02-02       Impact factor: 0.444

6.  A testing framework for identifying susceptibility genes in the presence of epistasis.

Authors:  Joshua Millstein; David V Conti; Frank D Gilliland; W James Gauderman
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2005-11-11       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Bias in random forest variable importance measures: illustrations, sources and a solution.

Authors:  Carolin Strobl; Anne-Laure Boulesteix; Achim Zeileis; Torsten Hothorn
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-01-25       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Two-stage two-locus models in genome-wide association.

Authors:  David M Evans; Jonathan Marchini; Andrew P Morris; Lon R Cardon
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2006-09-22       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  Robust associations of four new chromosome regions from genome-wide analyses of type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  John A Todd; Neil M Walker; Jason D Cooper; Deborah J Smyth; Kate Downes; Vincent Plagnol; Rebecca Bailey; Sergey Nejentsev; Sarah F Field; Felicity Payne; Christopher E Lowe; Jeffrey S Szeszko; Jason P Hafler; Lauren Zeitels; Jennie H M Yang; Adrian Vella; Sarah Nutland; Helen E Stevens; Helen Schuilenburg; Gillian Coleman; Meeta Maisuria; William Meadows; Luc J Smink; Barry Healy; Oliver S Burren; Alex A C Lam; Nigel R Ovington; James Allen; Ellen Adlem; Hin-Tak Leung; Chris Wallace; Joanna M M Howson; Cristian Guja; Constantin Ionescu-Tîrgovişte; Matthew J Simmonds; Joanne M Heward; Stephen C L Gough; David B Dunger; Linda S Wicker; David G Clayton
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2007-06-06       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  Genome-wide association study of 14,000 cases of seven common diseases and 3,000 shared controls.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-06-07       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  51 in total

1.  A FAST ALGORITHM FOR DETECTING GENE-GENE INTERACTIONS IN GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION STUDIES.

Authors:  Jiahan Li; Wei Zhong; Runze Li; Rongling Wu
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.083

2.  A general framework for two-stage analysis of genome-wide association studies and its application to case-control studies.

Authors:  James M S Wason; Frank Dudbridge
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  A model-free approach for detecting interactions in genetic association studies.

Authors:  Jiahan Li; Jun Dan; Chunlei Li; Rongling Wu
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 11.622

4.  Prediction of genetic values of quantitative traits with epistatic effects in plant breeding populations.

Authors:  D Wang; I Salah El-Basyoni; P Stephen Baenziger; J Crossa; K M Eskridge; I Dweikat
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 3.821

5.  A comparison of multifactor dimensionality reduction and L1-penalized regression to identify gene-gene interactions in genetic association studies.

Authors:  Stacey Winham; Chong Wang; Alison A Motsinger-Reif
Journal:  Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2011-01-06

6.  Adaptive tests for detecting gene-gene and gene-environment interactions.

Authors:  Wei Pan; Saonli Basu; Xiaotong Shen
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 0.444

7.  Testing for polygenic effects in genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Wei Pan; Yue-Ming Chen; Peng Wei
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 2.135

8.  Variable selection and prediction using a nested, matched case-control study: Application to hospital acquired pneumonia in stroke patients.

Authors:  Jing Qian; Seyedmehdi Payabvash; André Kemmling; Michael H Lev; Lee H Schwamm; Rebecca A Betensky
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Testing gene-gene interactions in genome wide association studies.

Authors:  Jie Kate Hu; Xianlong Wang; Pei Wang
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 2.135

10.  Detection of gene-gene interactions using multistage sparse and low-rank regression.

Authors:  Hung Hung; Yu-Ting Lin; Penweng Chen; Chen-Chien Wang; Su-Yun Huang; Jung-Ying Tzeng
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.