Literature DB >> 20087850

Socioeconomic position and secondary preventive therapy after an AMI.

Henrik Ohlsson1, Maria Rosvall, Ole Hansen, Basile Chaix, Juan Merlo.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the association between socioeconomic position and use of lipid-lowering drugs and ACE-inhibitors after an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) when simultaneously considering participation in the national quality register RIKS-HIA (Register of Information and Knowledge about Swedish Heart Intensive care Admissions), age, sex and previous hospitalizations of the patients.
METHODS: Population-based prospective cohort study included all 1346 AMI patients cared in the county of Scania, Sweden during 2006 of whom 1061 were register at the RIKS-HIA. Treatment with lipid-lowering and ACE-inhibiting therapy in relation to income was investigated with Cox and logistic regression modelling.
RESULTS: In the whole population of AMI patients, high income patients had a higher adherence to guidelines for pharmacological secondary prevention than low income patients (HR(lipid-lowering drug): 1.29; 95%CI: 1.12-1.49 and HR(ACE-inhibitor therapy): 1.22; 95%CI: 1.04-1.43). Among RIKS-HIA participants, patients with high income presented a better adherence to lipid-lowering treatment than patients with low income (HR: 1.15; 95%CI: 0.98-1.34).
CONCLUSION: Our investigation reveals that the Swedish goal of access to health care on equal terms and according to needs is still not fully accomplished. Moreover, since this pattern of inequity in pharmacological secondary prevention may lead to the recurrence of heart disease, these inequities are not only a matter of fairness and social justice, but also a potential (and modifiable) source of ineffectiveness and inefficiency in health care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20087850     DOI: 10.1002/pds.1917

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf        ISSN: 1053-8569            Impact factor:   2.890


  6 in total

1.  Recommended drug use after acute myocardial infarction by migration status and education level.

Authors:  Dashti Ali Mustafa Dzayee; Tahereh Moradi; Omid Beiki; Lars Alfredsson; Rickard Ljung
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-02-28       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 2.  Effect of Socioeconomic Status on Propensity to Change Risk Behaviors Following Myocardial Infarction: Implications for Healthy Lifestyle Medicine.

Authors:  Diann E Gaalema; Rebecca J Elliott; Zachary H Morford; Stephen T Higgins; Philip A Ades
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 8.194

3.  Social stratification in the dissemination of statins after stroke in Sweden.

Authors:  Maria Sjölander; Marie Eriksson; Eva-Lotta Glader
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 2.953

4.  Neighborhood socioeconomic status, Medicaid coverage and medical management of myocardial infarction: atherosclerosis risk in communities (ARIC) community surveillance.

Authors:  Randi E Foraker; Kathryn M Rose; Eric A Whitsel; Chirayath M Suchindran; Joy L Wood; Wayne D Rosamond
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  Income-related inequity in initiation of evidence-based therapies among patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Gillian E Hanley; Steve Morgan; Robert J Reid
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Mortality in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients without standard modifiable risk factors: A race disaggregated analysis.

Authors:  Saadiq M Moledina; Ofer Kobo; Hammad Lakhani; Abhishek Abhishek; Purvi Parwani; Annabelle Santos Volgman; Rachel M Bond; Muhammad Rashid; Gemma A Figtree; Mamas A Mamas
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2022-10-10
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.