Literature DB >> 2008626

Need satisfaction in terminal care settings.

N J Dawson1.   

Abstract

Research comparing hospice and conventional programs of care for the terminally ill has identified few measurable differences in the care provided to patients and their families. Nonetheless, hospice recipients frequently express a higher level of satisfaction with their program of care. This study compared the ability of hospice and conventional care settings to meet the basic emotional needs of families during a member's dying and death from cancer. In addition, the relationship of basic needs satisfaction, perceptions about the nurse, and overall satisfaction with the program of care were explored. One hundred bereaved familial care givers completed a mail questionnaire concerning their perceptions of care at the site of a family member's death. The sites were (1) the home, with care provided by a Medicare certified, community-based hospice program: (2) a hospital affiliated with a Medicare certified, community-based hospice program; (3) a hospital with its own hospice program; and (4) a conventional (non-hospice) hospital. Analyses of quantitative data supported two hypotheses about significant differences between hospice and conventional care. The conventional care group demonstrated the lowest levels of basic needs satisfaction, satisfaction with the psycho-social support of the nurse, and overall program satisfaction. As predicted, overall satisfaction with care was consistent across hospice groups. However, home hospice care provided the highest quality of basic needs satisfaction and the highest level of satisfaction with the nurse. Significant Pearson correlations supported the hypothesis that overall satisfaction is negatively related to unmet basic needs (r = -0.69) and positively related to the psycho-social support received from nurses (r = 0.73).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2008626     DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90131-u

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  16 in total

1.  The lack of effect of market structure on hospice use.

Authors:  Theodore J Iwashyna; Virginia W Chang; James X Zhang; Nicholas A Christakis
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 2.  Advanced cancer: aiming for the best in care.

Authors:  I Higginson
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1993-06

Review 3.  Informal caregiving of hospice patients.

Authors:  Colin G Pottie; Karen A Burch; Lori P Montross Thomas; Scott A Irwin
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.947

4.  Clinical, sociodemographic, and local system factors associated with a hospital death among cancer patients.

Authors:  Marylou Cárdenas-Turanzas; Richard M Grimes; Eduardo Bruera; Beth Quill; Guillermo Tortolero-Luna
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2005-04-21       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Does hospice improve quality of care for persons dying from dementia?

Authors:  Joan M Teno; Pedro L Gozalo; Ian C Lee; Sylvia Kuo; Carol Spence; Stephen R Connor; David J Casarett
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 5.562

6.  Impact of combined hospice care on terminal cancer patients.

Authors:  Song-Seng Loke; Kung-Ming Rau; Chih-Fang Huang
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 2.947

7.  The Italian version of the FAMCARE scale: a validation study.

Authors:  Rabih Chattat; Giovanni Ottoboni; Anita Zeneli; Maria Alejandra Berardi; Veronica Cossu; Marco Maltoni
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  A methodology for identifying married couples in Medicare data: mortality, morbidity, and health care use among the married elderly.

Authors:  T J Iwashyna; J X Zhang; D S Lauderdale; N A Christakis
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1998-11

9.  Measuring quality of palliative care: psychometric properties of the FAMCARE Scale.

Authors:  Gerd Inger Ringdal; Marit S Jordhøy; Stein Kaasa
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Timing of referral of terminally ill patients to an outpatient hospice.

Authors:  N A Christakis
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.