Literature DB >> 27067593

The Italian version of the FAMCARE scale: a validation study.

Rabih Chattat1, Giovanni Ottoboni1, Anita Zeneli2, Maria Alejandra Berardi3, Veronica Cossu1, Marco Maltoni4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Evaluation of the quality of care is a key element that healthcare providers now take into consideration to meet patients' needs, expectations, and values. The FAMCARE scale is one of the most important instruments available to assess the level of satisfaction about care received by patients and families. We describe the validation process used to develop an Italian version (IF) of the original FAMCARE scale for caregivers.
METHODS: The IF was prepared according to standard guidelines for translation and transcultural adaptation of self-reported measures. The scale was self-administered to 132 informal caregivers of patients with cancer treated with curative and/or palliative care in a hospice, outpatient, or inpatient setting for at least 1 month. The participant group was composed of spouses (47.73 %), children (31.82 %), siblings (3.03 %), or other relatives (17.42 %). All participants simultaneously completed the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) questionnaire to test the construct validity. Twenty-two percent of randomly chosen participants re-completed the test after 1 month to evaluate IF test-retest stability.
RESULTS: The IF showed a strong reliability with internal consistency [α = 0.93, confidence intervals (CI) = 0.91-0.95] and test-retest stability (Pearson r = 0.38; Kendall's tau-b = 0,25; Spearman's rho =0.34). Factor analysis identified four factors capable of explaining the 63 % total variance which did not change after the Varimax normalized rotation. Notwithstanding the lack of correlation with the VAS component of the EQ-5D questionnaire, our results highlighted robust psychometric properties of the IF.
CONCLUSIONS: IF is a valid translation of the FAMCARE scale and can be used to assess caregiver satisfaction within the Italian context of cancer palliative care.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer patients; Cancer services; Care satisfaction; Caregivers; FAMCARE scale validation; Self-reported instruments

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27067593     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-016-3187-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  27 in total

1.  Factors affecting grief reactions in close family members to individuals who have died of cancer.

Authors:  G I Ringdal; M S Jordhøy; K Ringdal; S Kaasa
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.612

2.  Family members' care expectations, care perceptions, and satisfaction with advanced cancer care: results of a multi-site pilot study.

Authors:  L J Kristjanson; A Leis; P M Koop; K C Carrière; B Mueller
Journal:  J Palliat Care       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.250

3.  Caregiver satisfaction with out-patient oncology services: utility of the FAMCARE instrument and development of the FAMCARE-6.

Authors:  Gregory Leigh Carter; Terry J Lewin; Louisa Gianacas; Kerrie Clover; Catherine Adams
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-03-28       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Quality of terminal care: salient indicators identified by families.

Authors:  L J Kristjanson
Journal:  J Palliat Care       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.250

Review 5.  Quality of life in palliative care: principles and practice.

Authors:  Stein Kaasa; Jon Håvard Loge
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.762

6.  Palliative care for families: remembering the hidden patients.

Authors:  Linda J Kristjanson; Samar Aoun
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.356

7.  Patient expectations: what do primary care patients want from the GP and how far does meeting expectations affect patient satisfaction?

Authors:  S Williams; J Weinman; J Dale; S Newman
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.267

8.  Measuring quality of palliative care: psychometric properties of the FAMCARE Scale.

Authors:  Gerd Inger Ringdal; Marit S Jordhøy; Stein Kaasa
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Assessing the construct validity of the Italian version of the EQ-5D: preliminary results from a cross-sectional study in North Italy.

Authors:  Elena Savoia; Maria Pia Fantini; Pier Paolo Pandolfi; Laura Dallolio; Natalina Collina
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2006-08-10       Impact factor: 3.186

10.  Relationship between three palliative care outcome scales.

Authors:  Irene J Higginson; Nora Donaldson
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2004-11-29       Impact factor: 3.186

View more
  2 in total

1.  Systematic vs. on-demand early palliative care in gastric cancer patients: a randomized clinical trial assessing patient and healthcare service outcomes.

Authors:  Emanuela Scarpi; Monia Dall'Agata; Vittorina Zagonel; Teresa Gamucci; Raffaella Bertè; Elisabetta Sansoni; Elena Amaducci; Chiara Maria Broglia; Sara Alquati; Ferdinando Garetto; Stefania Schiavon; Silvia Quadrini; Elena Orlandi; Andrea Casadei Gardini; Silvia Ruscelli; Daris Ferrari; Maria Simona Pino; Roberto Bortolussi; Federica Negri; Silvia Stragliotto; Filomena Narducci; Martina Valgiusti; Alberto Farolfi; Oriana Nanni; Romina Rossi; Marco Maltoni
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  A cross-sectional evaluation of the idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis patient satisfaction and quality of life with a care coordinator.

Authors:  Nathan Hambly; Sarah Goodwin; Afia Aziz-Ur-Rehman; Nima Makhdami; Margaret Ainslie-Garcia; Daniel Grima; Gerard Cox; Martin Kolb; Diana Fung; Czerysh Cabalteja; Patricia DeMarco; Daniel Moldaver
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.895

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.