OBJECTIVES: We sought to identify clinical and/or plaque characteristics that affect atherosclerotic disease progression and arterial remodeling in the carotid artery with subclinical stenosis. BACKGROUND: Increasing severity of stenosis has been associated with a higher risk of stroke. Factors that drive subclinical lesions to become stenotic plaques remain ambiguous. Carotid magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been validated with histology to accurately quantify in vivo arterial morphology and plaque composition. METHODS: A total of 67 asymptomatic participants with 16% to 49% carotid stenosis as demonstrated by duplex ultrasonography were imaged at 1.5-T with a carotid MRI protocol at baseline and at 18-month follow-up. Clinical and/or intra-arterial metrics with a significant association with change in plaque burden during multivariate analysis were evaluated for effects on lumen, wall, and total vessel volume. RESULTS: From multiple regression analysis, intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH) (p < 0.001) and statin therapy (p = 0.015) were identified as key determinants of change in plaque burden. The group with IPH compared with the group without IPH demonstrated luminal narrowing, with a mean +/- SD decrease in lumen volume (-24.9 +/- 21.1 mm(3)/year vs. -0.5 +/- 26.9 mm(3)/year; p = 0.005), a larger increase in wall volume (44.1 +/- 36.1 mm(3)/year vs. 0.8 +/- 34.5 mm(3)/year; p < 0.001), and no difference in total vessel volume (19.3 +/- 27.4 mm(3)/year vs. 0.4 +/- 42.4 mm(3)/year; p = 0.15). The nonstatin group compared with the statin group demonstrated outward remodeling, with an increase in wall volume (22.4 +/- 35.6 mm(3)/year(3)/year vs. 0.9 +/- 38.0 mm(3)/year; p = 0.026) and total vessel volume (19.2 +/- 36.9 mm(3)/year vs. -4.9 +/- 40.4 mm(3)/year; p = 0.019) and no difference in lumen volume (-5.8 +/- 26.6 mm(3)/year vs. -3.2 +/- 29.5 mm(3)/year; p = 0.72). CONCLUSIONS: IPH may represent an indication of accelerated plaque growth and impending luminal compromise in the subclinical carotid artery. Statin therapy may stabilize lesions by slowing or halting lesion progression. This phase of plaque stenosis (16% to 49%) may be a critical stage for intrinsic and extrinsic factors to affect the atherosclerotic disease process.
OBJECTIVES: We sought to identify clinical and/or plaque characteristics that affect atherosclerotic disease progression and arterial remodeling in the carotid artery with subclinical stenosis. BACKGROUND: Increasing severity of stenosis has been associated with a higher risk of stroke. Factors that drive subclinical lesions to become stenotic plaques remain ambiguous. Carotid magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been validated with histology to accurately quantify in vivo arterial morphology and plaque composition. METHODS: A total of 67 asymptomatic participants with 16% to 49% carotid stenosis as demonstrated by duplex ultrasonography were imaged at 1.5-T with a carotid MRI protocol at baseline and at 18-month follow-up. Clinical and/or intra-arterial metrics with a significant association with change in plaque burden during multivariate analysis were evaluated for effects on lumen, wall, and total vessel volume. RESULTS: From multiple regression analysis, intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH) (p < 0.001) and statin therapy (p = 0.015) were identified as key determinants of change in plaque burden. The group with IPH compared with the group without IPH demonstrated luminal narrowing, with a mean +/- SD decrease in lumen volume (-24.9 +/- 21.1 mm(3)/year vs. -0.5 +/- 26.9 mm(3)/year; p = 0.005), a larger increase in wall volume (44.1 +/- 36.1 mm(3)/year vs. 0.8 +/- 34.5 mm(3)/year; p < 0.001), and no difference in total vessel volume (19.3 +/- 27.4 mm(3)/year vs. 0.4 +/- 42.4 mm(3)/year; p = 0.15). The nonstatin group compared with the statin group demonstrated outward remodeling, with an increase in wall volume (22.4 +/- 35.6 mm(3)/year(3)/year vs. 0.9 +/- 38.0 mm(3)/year; p = 0.026) and total vessel volume (19.2 +/- 36.9 mm(3)/year vs. -4.9 +/- 40.4 mm(3)/year; p = 0.019) and no difference in lumen volume (-5.8 +/- 26.6 mm(3)/year vs. -3.2 +/- 29.5 mm(3)/year; p = 0.72). CONCLUSIONS:IPH may represent an indication of accelerated plaque growth and impending luminal compromise in the subclinical carotid artery. Statin therapy may stabilize lesions by slowing or halting lesion progression. This phase of plaque stenosis (16% to 49%) may be a critical stage for intrinsic and extrinsic factors to affect the atherosclerotic disease process.
Authors: T Saam; M S Ferguson; V L Yarnykh; N Takaya; D Xu; N L Polissar; T S Hatsukami; C Yuan Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2004-11-04 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: Jianming Cai; Thomas S Hatsukami; Marina S Ferguson; William S Kerwin; Tobias Saam; Baocheng Chu; Norihide Takaya; Nayak L Polissar; Chun Yuan Journal: Circulation Date: 2005-11-21 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Rachael E Murphy; Alan R Moody; Paul S Morgan; Anne L Martel; G S Delay; Steve Allder; Shane T MacSweeney; William G Tennant; John Gladman; John Lowe; Beverley J Hunt Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-06-09 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Norihide Takaya; Chun Yuan; Baocheng Chu; Tobias Saam; Nayak L Polissar; Gail P Jarvik; Carol Isaac; Judith McDonough; Cynthia Natiello; Randy Small; Marina S Ferguson; Thomas S Hatsukami Journal: Circulation Date: 2005-05-23 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Frank D Kolodgie; Herman K Gold; Allen P Burke; David R Fowler; Howard S Kruth; Deena K Weber; Andrew Farb; L J Guerrero; Motoya Hayase; Robert Kutys; Jagat Narula; Aloke V Finn; Renu Virmani Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-12-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Steven E Nissen; E Murat Tuzcu; Paul Schoenhagen; B Greg Brown; Peter Ganz; Robert A Vogel; Tim Crowe; Gail Howard; Christopher J Cooper; Bruce Brodie; Cindy L Grines; Anthony N DeMaria Journal: JAMA Date: 2004-03-03 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Baocheng Chu; Annette Kampschulte; Marina S Ferguson; William S Kerwin; Vasily L Yarnykh; Kevin D O'Brien; Nayak L Polissar; Thomas S Hatsukami; Chun Yuan Journal: Stroke Date: 2004-04-01 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: L B Eisenmenger; B W Aldred; S-E Kim; G J Stoddard; A de Havenon; G S Treiman; D L Parker; J S McNally Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2016-04-21 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Jinnan Wang; Peter Börnert; Huilin Zhao; Daniel S Hippe; Xihai Zhao; Niranjan Balu; Marina S Ferguson; Thomas S Hatsukami; Jianrong Xu; Chun Yuan; William S Kerwin Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2012-03-22 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Dongxiang Xu; Daniel S Hippe; Hunter R Underhill; Minako Oikawa-Wakayama; Li Dong; Kiyofumi Yamada; Chun Yuan; Thomas S Hatsukami Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2014-03-13
Authors: Malachi Sheahan; Xiaonan Ma; David Paik; Nancy A Obuchowski; Samantha St Pierre; William P Newman; Guenevere Rae; Eric S Perlman; Michael Rosol; James C Keith; Andrew J Buckler Journal: Radiology Date: 2017-08-31 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Jie Sun; Yan Song; Huijun Chen; William S Kerwin; Daniel S Hippe; Li Dong; Min Chen; Cheng Zhou; Thomas S Hatsukami; Chun Yuan Journal: Stroke Date: 2013-03-07 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Li Dong; William S Kerwin; Marina S Ferguson; Rui Li; Jinnan Wang; Huijun Chen; Gador Canton; Thomas S Hatsukami; Chun Yuan Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2009-12-15 Impact factor: 5.364