Literature DB >> 28858564

Atherosclerotic Plaque Tissue: Noninvasive Quantitative Assessment of Characteristics with Software-aided Measurements from Conventional CT Angiography.

Malachi Sheahan1, Xiaonan Ma1, David Paik1, Nancy A Obuchowski1, Samantha St Pierre1, William P Newman1, Guenevere Rae1, Eric S Perlman1, Michael Rosol1, James C Keith1, Andrew J Buckler1.   

Abstract

Purpose To (a) evaluate whether plaque tissue characteristics determined with conventional computed tomographic (CT) angiography could be quantitated at higher levels of accuracy by using image processing algorithms that take characteristics of the image formation process coupled with biologic insights on tissue distributions into account by comparing in vivo results and ex vivo histologic findings and (b) assess reader variability. Materials and Methods Thirty-one consecutive patients aged 43-85 years (average age, 64 years) known to have or suspected of having atherosclerosis who underwent CT angiography and were referred for endarterectomy were enrolled. Surgical specimens were evaluated with histopathologic examination to serve as standard of reference. Two readers used lumen boundary to determine scanner blur and then optimized component densities and subvoxel boundaries to best fit the observed image by using semiautomatic software. The accuracy of the resulting in vivo quantitation of calcification, lipid-rich necrotic core (LRNC), and matrix was assessed with statistical estimates of bias and linearity relative to ex vivo histologic findings. Reader variability was assessed with statistical estimates of repeatability and reproducibility. Results A total of 239 cross sections obtained with CT angiography and histologic examination were matched. Performance on held-out data showed low levels of bias and high Pearson correlation coefficients for calcification (-0.096 mm2 and 0.973, respectively), LRNC (1.26 mm2 and 0.856), and matrix (-2.44 mm2 and 0.885). Intrareader variability was low (repeatability coefficient ranged from 1.50 mm2 to 1.83 mm2 among tissue characteristics), as was interreader variability (reproducibility coefficient ranged from 2.09 mm2 to 4.43 mm2). Conclusion There was high correlation and low bias between the in vivo software image analysis and ex vivo histopathologic quantitative measures of atherosclerotic plaque tissue characteristics, as well as low reader variability. Software algorithms can mitigate the blurring and partial volume effects of routine CT angiography acquisitions to produce accurate quantification to enhance current clinical practice. Clinical trial registration no. NCT02143102 © RSNA, 2017 Online supplemental material is available for this article. An earlier incorrect version of this article appeared online. This article was corrected on September 15, 2017.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28858564      PMCID: PMC5790306          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2017170127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  41 in total

1.  Automated versus manual in vivo segmentation of carotid plaque MRI.

Authors:  R van 't Klooster; O Naggara; R Marsico; J H C Reiber; J-F Meder; R J van der Geest; E Touzé; C Oppenheim
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Characterization of carotid plaque hemorrhage: a CT angiography and MR intraplaque hemorrhage study.

Authors:  Jean Marie U-King-Im; Allan J Fox; Richard I Aviv; Peter Howard; Robert Yeung; Alan R Moody; Sean P Symons
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 7.914

3.  2011 ASA/ACCF/AHA/AANN/AANS/ACR/ASNR/CNS/SAIP/SCAI/SIR/SNIS/SVM/SVS guideline on the management of patients with extracranial carotid and vertebral artery disease. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American Stroke Association, American Association of Neuroscience Nurses, American Association of Neurological Surgeons, American College of Radiology, American Society of Neuroradiology, Congress of Neurological Surgeons, Society of Atherosclerosis Imaging and Prevention, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery, Society for Vascular Medicine, and Society for Vascular Surgery.

Authors:  Thomas G Brott; Jonathan L Halperin; Suhny Abbara; J Michael Bacharach; John D Barr; Ruth L Bush; Christopher U Cates; Mark A Creager; Susan B Fowler; Gary Friday; Vicki S Hertzberg; E Bruce McIff; Wesley S Moore; Peter D Panagos; Thomas S Riles; Robert H Rosenwasser; Allen J Taylor
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Comparison of carotid plaque ulcer detection using contrast-enhanced and time-of-flight MRA techniques.

Authors:  M Etesami; Y Hoi; D A Steinman; S K Gujar; A E Nidecker; B C Astor; A Portanova; Y Qiao; W M A Abdalla; B A Wasserman
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 5.  Imaging of high-risk carotid artery plaques: current status and future directions.

Authors:  J Kevin DeMarco; John Huston
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.047

6.  Signal features of the atherosclerotic plaque at 3.0 Tesla versus 1.5 Tesla: impact on automatic classification.

Authors:  William S Kerwin; Fei Liu; Vasily Yarnykh; Hunter Underhill; Minako Oikawa; Wei Yu; Thomas S Hatsukami; Chun Yuan
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Carotid artery wall thickness and ischemic symptoms: evaluation using multi-detector-row CT angiography.

Authors:  Luca Saba; Roberto Sanfilippo; Luigi Pascalis; Roberto Montisci; Giancarlo Caddeo; Giorgio Mallarini
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  Carotid plaque MRI and stroke risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ajay Gupta; Hediyeh Baradaran; Andrew D Schweitzer; Hooman Kamel; Ankur Pandya; Diana Delgado; Allison Dunning; Alvin I Mushlin; Pina C Sanelli
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 9.  Quantitative imaging biomarkers: a review of statistical methods for computer algorithm comparisons.

Authors:  Nancy A Obuchowski; Anthony P Reeves; Erich P Huang; Xiao-Feng Wang; Andrew J Buckler; Hyun J Grace Kim; Huiman X Barnhart; Edward F Jackson; Maryellen L Giger; Gene Pennello; Alicia Y Toledano; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Tatiyana V Apanasovich; Paul E Kinahan; Kyle J Myers; Dmitry B Goldgof; Daniel P Barboriak; Robert J Gillies; Lawrence H Schwartz; Daniel C Sullivan
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 3.021

10.  Spatio-temporal texture (SpTeT) for distinguishing vulnerable from stable atherosclerotic plaque on dynamic contrast enhancement (DCE) MRI in a rabbit model.

Authors:  Tao Wan; Anant Madabhushi; Alkystis Phinikaridou; James A Hamilton; Ning Hua; Tuan Pham; Jovanna Danagoulian; Ross Kleiman; Andrew J Buckler
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  22 in total

Review 1.  Emerging Role of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography in Lipid-Lowering Therapy: a Bridge to Image-Guided Personalized Medicine.

Authors:  Toru Miyoshi; Kazuhiro Osawa; Keishi Ichikawa; Kazuki Suruga; Takashi Miki; Masashi Yoshida; Koji Nakagawa; Hironobu Toda; Kazufumi Nakamura; Hiroshi Morita; Hiroshi Ito
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Carotid Intraplaque-Hemorrhage Volume and Its Association with Cerebrovascular Events.

Authors:  L Saba; G Micheletti; W Brinjikji; P Garofalo; R Montisci; A Balestrieri; J S Suri; J K DeMarco; G Lanzino; R Sanfilippo
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Semiautomated carotid artery plaque composition: are intraplaque CT imaging features associated with cardiovascular risk factors?

Authors:  John C Benson; Giuseppe Lanzino; Valentina Nardi; Luis Savastano; Amir Lerman; Waleed Brinjikji
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 4.  Extraction of Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaques From Computed Tomography Imaging: A Review of Recent Methods.

Authors:  Haipeng Liu; Aleksandra Wingert; Jian'an Wang; Jucheng Zhang; Xinhong Wang; Jianzhong Sun; Fei Chen; Syed Ghufran Khalid; Jun Jiang; Dingchang Zheng
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-02-10

5.  Machine learning-based advances in coronary computed tomography angiography.

Authors:  Mina M Benjamin; Mark G Rabbat
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-06

6.  Quantitative assessment of carotid plaque morphology (geometry and tissue composition) using computed tomography angiography.

Authors:  Matthew T Chrencik; Amir A Khan; Lauren Luther; Laila Anthony; John Yokemick; Jigar Patel; John D Sorkin; Siddhartha Sikdar; Brajesh K Lal
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 4.268

7.  Carotid Plaque CTA Analysis in Symptomatic Subjects with Bilateral Intraparenchymal Hemorrhage: A Preliminary Analysis.

Authors:  L Saba; G Lanzino; P Lucatelli; F Lavra; R Sanfilippo; R Montisci; J S Suri; C Yuan
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 8.  Application of Non-invasive Imaging in Inflammatory Disease Conditions to Evaluate Subclinical Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Harry Choi; Domingo E Uceda; Amit K Dey; Nehal N Mehta
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 4.592

9.  Semiautomated Characterization of Carotid Artery Plaque Features From Computed Tomography Angiography to Predict Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk Score.

Authors:  Guangming Zhu; Ying Li; Victoria Ding; Bin Jiang; Robyn L Ball; Fatima Rodriguez; Dominik Fleischmann; Manisha Desai; David Saloner; Ajay Gupta; Luca Saba; Jason Hom; Max Wintermark
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2019 May/Jun       Impact factor: 1.826

Review 10.  Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography From Clinical Uses to Emerging Technologies: JACC State-of-the-Art Review.

Authors:  Khaled M Abdelrahman; Marcus Y Chen; Amit K Dey; Renu Virmani; Aloke V Finn; Ramzi Y Khamis; Andrew D Choi; James K Min; Michelle C Williams; Andrew J Buckler; Charles A Taylor; Campbell Rogers; Habib Samady; Charalambos Antoniades; Leslee J Shaw; Matthew J Budoff; Udo Hoffmann; Ron Blankstein; Jagat Narula; Nehal N Mehta
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 24.094

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.